Suppr超能文献

评估执业物理治疗师的专业图书馆。

Evaluating the professional libraries of practicing physical therapists.

作者信息

Brown Suzanne R, Roush James R, Lamkin Alyson R, Perrakis Rena, Kronenfeld Michael R

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jan;95(1):64-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to explore the use of information resources by a sample of physical therapists.

METHODS

A qualitatively designed study using structured individual interviews, examination of professional libraries, and identification of information resources was initiated in three sites (Southern California, Arizona, and Georgia). Participants included forty physical therapists with between five and twenty years of experience.

RESULTS

The Internet and continuing education activities appeared to be the primary information sources for the physical therapists surveyed. The personal professional libraries of participants were limited in scope and contained titles copyrighted more than ten years ago. Access to peer-reviewed journals in the sample was limited primarily to those received as a benefit of professional association membership.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Participants did not maintain current print professional information resources. The majority of books in the personal and workplace professional libraries held copyrights dating from the time of the participants' enrollment in an entry-level physical therapy program. Medical librarians may play an important role in shifting physical therapy towards evidence-based practice by collaborating in professional development for this group. Physical therapy educators and professional leaders should support current public collections of physical therapy-related information resources to encourage the movement towards an evidence-based practice model in physical therapy.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究的主要目的是探讨物理治疗师样本对信息资源的利用情况。

方法

在三个地点(南加州、亚利桑那州和佐治亚州)开展了一项定性研究,采用结构化个人访谈、专业图书馆检查以及信息资源识别。参与者包括40名有5至20年经验的物理治疗师。

结果

互联网和继续教育活动似乎是接受调查的物理治疗师的主要信息来源。参与者的个人专业图书馆范围有限,包含的书籍版权超过十年。样本中获取同行评审期刊的途径主要限于作为专业协会会员福利收到的期刊。

讨论与结论

参与者未保存最新的印刷专业信息资源。个人和工作场所专业图书馆中的大多数书籍版权可追溯到参与者进入入门级物理治疗项目之时。医学图书馆员可通过与该群体合作开展专业发展,在推动物理治疗向循证实践转变方面发挥重要作用。物理治疗教育工作者和专业领导者应支持当前物理治疗相关信息资源的公共馆藏,以鼓励向物理治疗循证实践模式转变。

相似文献

3
How rehabilitation therapists gather, evaluate, and implement new knowledge.
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Summer;22(3):170-80. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340220306.
4
Information resource preferences by general pediatricians in office settings: a qualitative study.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005 Oct 14;5:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-5-34.
5
The propensity to adopt evidence-based practice among physical therapists.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 5;7:103. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-103.
7
Practice analysis: defining the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Jun;34(6):284-304. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.6.284.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers towards evidence-based practice among physiotherapists in Malaysia.
Hong Kong Physiother J. 2017 Feb 28;37:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.hkpj.2016.12.002. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jan;98(1):73-81. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-based medicine in anesthesiology.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002 Dec;15(6):661-8. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200212000-00010.
2
Where's the evidence?
Am J Nurs. 2003 Oct;103(10):11. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200310000-00002.
4
5
Finnish nurses' views on their research activities.
J Clin Nurs. 2003 Jul;12(4):589-600. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00756.x.
6
Comparing evidence-based practice of nurses and physiotherapists.
Br J Nurs. 2003;12(4):246-53. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2003.12.4.11165.
7
Reading habits of practicing physiatrists.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;81(10):779-87. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200210000-00011.
9
Factors related to evidence-based practice among U.S. occupational therapy clinicians.
Am J Occup Ther. 2002 May-Jun;56(3):275-84. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.3.275.
10
Searching the health care literature efficiently: from clinical decision-making to continuing education.
Am J Infect Control. 2002 May;30(3):187-95. doi: 10.1067/mic.2002.120801.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验