Abidov Aiden, Gallagher Michael J, Chinnaiyan Kavitha M, Mehta Laxmi S, Wegner James H, Raff Gilbert L
Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):701-13. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9117-6. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
Management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and inconclusive stress imaging test findings may result in invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) may be useful in defining the risk of CAD and adverse outcomes in this patient population, as well as in reducing the need for ICA.
We prospectively enrolled 199 sequential patients referred by cardiologists for CCTA after either inconclusive or nondiagnostic stress imaging tests. Before CCTA, physicians identified a "planned catheterization" group of patients who would undergo invasive angiography if CCTA were not available. After CCTA testing, patients were followed for >or=2 years. We established the added diagnostic value of the CCTA and its prognostic power in prediction of intermediate-term follow-up events in this patient population as compared to available historical and clinical predictors of CAD, stress ECG, and stress imaging test results using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards survival analysis.
Both observed data and results of the multivariable model for the prediction of obstructive CAD (>50% stenosis), or major cardiac events (death MI or revascularization), demonstrated that clinical, stress ECG, and imaging results were weakly predictive, whereas CCTA was found to be a strong independent and incremental predictor of the absence of either significant CAD or MACE in this population. None of the 93 patients with normal CCTA scans had MACE events, whereas 18 patients with evidence of CAD on the CCTA results underwent revascularization. Overall, physicians planned ICA in 125 patients (63.0%); after CCTA, ICA was performed in only 32 (16.0%) cases over 2 years. In this population with no other highly effective noninvasive clinical tools for diagnostic and prognostic estimation, the overall negative predictive value of CCTA for either CAD > 50% or MACE for 2 years was 99%.
Observations from this prospective study demonstrate the significant added diagnostic value and prognostic potential of CCTA in patients with suspected CAD and either inconclusive or nondiagnostic stress test results in real-world settings. Normal CCTA results are associated with excellent intermediate-term prognosis in this clinical subset, and invasive angiography can be safely avoided in the majority of these patients when the results of CCTA are available.
对于疑似冠心病(CAD)且负荷成像检查结果不确定的患者,可能会进行有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)。冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)可能有助于确定该患者群体中CAD的风险和不良结局,以及减少对ICA的需求。
我们前瞻性纳入了199例经心脏病专家转诊进行CCTA检查的连续患者,这些患者之前的负荷成像检查结果不确定或无法诊断。在进行CCTA之前,医生确定了一组“计划进行导管插入术”的患者,如果没有CCTA,他们将接受有创血管造影。在CCTA检查后,对患者进行了≥2年的随访。我们通过多变量Cox比例风险生存分析,确定了CCTA在该患者群体中期随访事件预测中的附加诊断价值及其预后能力,并将其与CAD、负荷心电图和负荷成像检查结果的现有历史和临床预测指标进行了比较。
观察数据以及预测阻塞性CAD(狭窄>50%)或主要心脏事件(死亡、心肌梗死或血运重建)的多变量模型结果均表明,临床、负荷心电图和成像结果的预测能力较弱,而CCTA被发现是该人群中无显著CAD或主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的强大独立且递增的预测指标。93例CCTA扫描结果正常的患者均未发生MACE事件,而18例CCTA结果显示有CAD证据的患者接受了血运重建。总体而言,医生计划对125例患者(63.0%)进行ICA;在CCTA检查后,2年内仅32例(16.0%)患者进行了ICA。在这个没有其他高效非侵入性临床工具用于诊断和预后评估的人群中,CCTA对2年内CAD>50%或MACE的总体阴性预测值为99%。
这项前瞻性研究的观察结果表明,在现实环境中,CCTA对于疑似CAD且负荷试验结果不确定或无法诊断的患者具有显著的附加诊断价值和预后潜力。在这个临床亚组中,CCTA结果正常与良好的中期预后相关,当有CCTA结果时,大多数此类患者可以安全地避免进行有创血管造影。