Division of Cardiology, University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy.
J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Dec;22(6):527-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00491.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
Coronary angiography, despite its inherent invasiveness and need for contrast media and radiographic exposure, is still routinely employed every year for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of millions of patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. Whereas approximate visual estimation is the most common way to evaluate coronary angiography findings, since the late 1980s a number of investigators have developed and investigated methods of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analysis exploiting automated or semi-automated edge detection. Despite the inherent drawback of QCA due to its focus on the contrast-filled lumen of the vessel, QCA has offered and continues to offer important insights for clinical research and, in selected cases, clinical practice. This review aims thus to provide a comprehensive and updated viewpoint on the actual role of QCA.
冠状动脉造影术尽管具有固有侵袭性,并且需要对比介质和放射线暴露,但每年仍常规用于数以百万计患有或有患冠状动脉疾病风险的患者的诊断和治疗管理。虽然大致的视觉估计是评估冠状动脉造影结果最常见的方法,但自 20 世纪 80 年代后期以来,许多研究人员已经开发并研究了利用自动或半自动边缘检测的定量冠状动脉造影(QCA)分析方法。尽管 QCA 由于其专注于血管充满对比剂的腔而存在固有缺陷,但 QCA 已经并将继续为临床研究提供重要的见解,并且在某些情况下还为临床实践提供了重要的见解。因此,本篇综述旨在提供对 QCA 实际作用的全面和最新观点。