Suppr超能文献

通过动脉脉搏轮廓分析获得的每搏输出量变化评估术中液体反应性。

Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively.

作者信息

Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, Chiari A, Pestel G, Kaider A, Fleischmann E, Hetz H

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, General Intensive Care and Pain Control, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringerguertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2009 Sep;103(3):346-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep200. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitor has been reported to improve perioperative outcome. Stroke volume variation (SVV) is considered a reliable clinical predictor of fluid responsiveness. Consequently, the aim of the present trial was to evaluate the accuracy of SVV determined by arterial pulse contour (APCO) analysis, using the FloTrac/Vigileo system, to predict fluid responsiveness as measured by the oesophageal Doppler.

METHODS

Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery received intraoperative fluid management guided by oesophageal Doppler monitoring. Fluid boluses of 250 ml each were administered in case of a decrease in corrected flow time (FTc) to <350 ms. Patients were connected to a monitoring device, obtaining SVV by APCO. Haemodynamic variables were recorded before and after fluid bolus application. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in stroke volume index >10%. The ability of SVV to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed by calculation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Twenty patients received 67 fluid boluses. Fifty-two of the 67 fluid boluses administered resulted in fluid responsiveness. SVV achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.512 [confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.70]. A cut-off point for fluid responsiveness was found for SVV > or =8.5% (sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 43%; positive predictive value: 84%; and negative predictive value: 33%).

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, interventional observer-blinded study demonstrates that SVV obtained by APCO, using the FloTrac/Vigileo system, is not a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in the setting of major abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景

据报道,食管多普勒监测引导下的液体管理可改善围手术期结局。每搏量变异(SVV)被认为是液体反应性的可靠临床预测指标。因此,本试验的目的是评估使用FloTrac/Vigileo系统通过动脉脉搏轮廓(APCO)分析测定的SVV预测食管多普勒测量的液体反应性的准确性。

方法

接受大型腹部手术的患者在食管多普勒监测引导下进行术中液体管理。在校正血流时间(FTc)降至<350毫秒时,给予250毫升的液体推注。患者连接到监测设备,通过APCO获得SVV。在给予液体推注前后记录血流动力学变量。液体反应性定义为每搏量指数增加>10%。通过计算受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积评估SVV预测液体反应性的能力。

结果

20例患者接受了67次液体推注。67次给予的液体推注中有52次导致了液体反应性。SVV的ROC曲线下面积为0.512[置信区间(CI)0.32 - 0.70]。发现当SVV>或=8.5%时为液体反应性的截断点(敏感性:77%;特异性:43%;阳性预测值:84%;阴性预测值:33%)。

结论

这项前瞻性、介入性、观察者盲法研究表明,在大型腹部手术中,使用FloTrac/Vigileo系统通过APCO获得的SVV不是液体反应性的可靠预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验