• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

上腔静脉塌陷指数预测液体反应性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Superior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Opole, Poland.

Institute of Health Sciences, University of Opole, Poland.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56(3):169-176. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.142797.

DOI:10.5114/ait.2024.142797
PMID:39451163
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484487/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The superior vena cava collapsibility index (SVC-CI) is a potential marker of fluid responsiveness (FR) in mechanically ventilated patients. Few studies reporting its diagnostic performance are currently available.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search, using the PRISMA approach, was performed using the Medline and EMBASE databases. Prospective studies evaluating the SVC-CI as a marker of FR in ventilated adult patients were included. A bivariate random-effect model was utilised to generate the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), the sensitivity and specificity of the curve operating point were calculated.

RESULTS

We included eight studies with a total of 857 patients, in whom SVC-CI was evaluated a total of 1083 times prior to the volume expansion trial. In 609 (56.23%) trial cases FR was present. The SROC curve demonstrated that the test's operating point has a sensitivity and specificity of 80.8% (95% CI: 66.3-90%) and 81.4% (95% CI: 76.4-85.5%), respectively. The model's AUC was equal to 0.848 (95% CI: 0.824-0.863) with P < 0.001. No significant inter-study heterogeneity was found (I 2 = 0%). A subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower sensitivity of SVC-CI in patients with higher levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (> 5 cm H 2 O) (χ 2 = 7.753, df = 2, P = 0.0207). The study setting and type of intervention for volume expansion did not significantly change the performance of the test.

CONCLUSIONS

SVC-CI is a reliable predictor of FR for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units and operating rooms. A PEEP level exceeding 5 cm H 2 O may impair the sensitivity of the test.

摘要

介绍

上腔静脉塌陷指数(SVC-CI)是机械通气患者液体反应性(FR)的潜在标志物。目前,已有少量报告其诊断性能的研究。

材料与方法

采用 PRISMA 方法,对 Medline 和 EMBASE 数据库进行系统检索。纳入评估 SVC-CI 作为机械通气成人患者 FR 标志物的前瞻性研究。使用双变量随机效应模型生成汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。计算曲线工作点的曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感度和特异度。

结果

我们纳入了 8 项共 857 例患者的研究,其中共对 1083 次 SVC-CI 进行了评估,这些患者均进行了容量扩张试验。在 609 例(56.23%)试验病例中存在 FR。SROC 曲线表明,该试验的工作点具有 80.8%(95%CI:66.3-90%)的敏感度和 81.4%(95%CI:76.4-85.5%)的特异性。模型的 AUC 等于 0.848(95%CI:0.824-0.863),P<0.001。未发现显著的异质性(I 2=0%)。亚组分析显示,在 PEEP 水平较高(>5cmH 2 O)的患者中,SVC-CI 的敏感度显著降低(χ 2=7.753,df=2,P=0.0207)。容量扩张的研究环境和干预类型并未显著改变试验的性能。

结论

SVC-CI 是重症监护病房和手术室机械通气患者 FR 的可靠预测指标。PEEP 水平超过 5cmH 2 O 可能会降低试验的敏感度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/58579454e9d6/AIT-56-54738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/4280008122df/AIT-56-54738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/b3f3b5e98bc2/AIT-56-54738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/f925ed3b9f36/AIT-56-54738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/9fc105a4aea9/AIT-56-54738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/58579454e9d6/AIT-56-54738-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/4280008122df/AIT-56-54738-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/b3f3b5e98bc2/AIT-56-54738-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/f925ed3b9f36/AIT-56-54738-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/9fc105a4aea9/AIT-56-54738-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1781/11484487/58579454e9d6/AIT-56-54738-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Superior vena cava collapsibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review with meta-analysis.上腔静脉塌陷指数预测液体反应性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2024;56(3):169-176. doi: 10.5114/ait.2024.142797.
2
The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study.经微型经食管单平面连续超声心动图探头测量的上腔静脉塌陷指数对开放性大血管手术中预测液体反应性的价值与每搏量变异度的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Jun;34(3):491-499. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00346-4. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
3
Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation measured with transthoracic echocardiography to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after abdominal surgery.经胸超声心动图测量上、下腔静脉直径变化预测腹部手术后机械通气患者液体反应性的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 17;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01692-8.
4
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness with dynamic superior vena cava collapsibility index in mechanically ventilated patients.机械通气患者中应用动态上腔静脉塌陷指数评估液体反应性
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Apr 10;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00298-z.
5
[The assessment of ultrasonic measurement of superior vena cava blood flow for the volume responsiveness of patients with mechanical ventilation].[超声测量上腔静脉血流对机械通气患者容量反应性的评估]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Sep;26(9):624-8. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.09.004.
6
Does Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.下腔静脉直径呼吸变异度能否预测机械通气患者的液体反应性?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1157-1164. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003459.
7
Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters.通过同时记录下腔静脉和上腔静脉直径来预测前负荷反应性。
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 5;18(5):473. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0473-5.
8
Assessment of fluid responsiveness using pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, plethysmographic variability index, central venous pressure, and inferior vena cava variation in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机械通气患者应用脉搏压变异度、每搏量变异度、容量监测仪变异指数、中心静脉压及下腔静脉变异度评估容量反应性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2024 Aug 31;28(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05078-9.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Patients With Sepsis and Acute Circulatory Failure.下腔静脉可塌陷性预测脓毒症和急性循环衰竭自主呼吸患者液体反应性的诊断准确性
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):e290-e297. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002090.
10
Comparison of Echocardiographic Indices Used to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Ventilated Patients.比较超声心动图指标用于预测机械通气患者的液体反应性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 15;195(8):1022-1032. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0844OC.

本文引用的文献

1
Variables influencing the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.影响液体反应性预测的变量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2023 Sep 20;27(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04629-w.
2
Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.评估医学检验:介绍《Cochrane诊断试验准确性系统评价手册》
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 20;7(7):ED000163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000163.
3
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness with dynamic superior vena cava collapsibility index in mechanically ventilated patients.
机械通气患者中应用动态上腔静脉塌陷指数评估液体反应性
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Apr 10;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00298-z.
4
Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?液体反应性的预测。有什么新进展?
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 May 28;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01022-8.
5
Comparison of superior and inferior vena cava diameter variation measured with transthoracic echocardiography to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients after abdominal surgery.经胸超声心动图测量上、下腔静脉直径变化预测腹部手术后机械通气患者液体反应性的比较。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 17;22(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01692-8.
6
Efficacy of using tidal volume challenge to improve the reliability of pulse pressure variation reduced in low tidal volume ventilated critically ill patients with decreased respiratory system compliance.小潮气量通气患者呼吸系统顺应性降低时,使用潮气量挑战来提高脉搏压变异度降低可靠性的效果。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 4;22(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01676-8.
7
QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.QUADAS-C:用于评估诊断准确性比较研究偏倚风险的工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Nov;174(11):1592-1599. doi: 10.7326/M21-2234. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
8
Comparison of Superior Vena Cava and Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Changes by Echocardiography in Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.超声心动图测量上腔静脉和下腔静脉直径变化在预测机械通气患者液体反应性中的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):441-447. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_1_21. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis.低潮气量机械通气的危重症患者液体反应性的预测因素:系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00817-5.