Suppr超能文献

壶腹切除术实践调查。

A survey of ampullectomy practices.

作者信息

Menees Stacy B, Schoenfeld Philip, Kim Hyungjin Myra, Elta Grace H

机构信息

Eastern Virginia Medical School, 885 Kempsville Rd, Suite 114, Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul 28;15(28):3486-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3486.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the endoscopic ampullectomy practices of expert biliary endoscopists.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was mailed to 79 expert biliary endoscopists to assess ampullectomy practices.

RESULTS

Forty six (58%) biliary endoscopists returned the questionnaire. Of these, 63% were in academia and in practice for an average of 16.4 years (+/- 8.6). Endoscopists performed an average of 1.1 (+/- 0.8) ampullectomies per month. Prior to ampullectomy, endoscopic ultrasound was "always" utilized by 67% of respondents vs "sometimes" in 31% of respondents. Empiric biliary sphincterotomy was not utilized uniformly, only 26% "always" and 37% "sometimes" performed it prior to resection. Fifty three percent reported "never" performing empiric pancreatic sphincterotomy prior to ampullectomy. Practitioners with high endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography volumes were the most likely to perform a pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR = 10.9; P = 0.09). Participants overwhelmingly favored "always" placing a prophylactic pancreatic stent, with 86% placing it after ampullectomy rather than prior to resection (23%). Argon plasma coagulation was the favored adjunct modality (83%) for removal of residual adenomatous tissue. Practitioners uniformly (100%) preferred follow-up examination to be within 6 mo post-ampullectomy.

CONCLUSION

Among biliary experts, there is less variation in ampullectomy practices than is reflected in the literature.

摘要

目的

调查胆道内镜专家的内镜下壶腹切除术操作情况。

方法

向79位胆道内镜专家邮寄了一份匿名调查问卷,以评估壶腹切除术的操作情况。

结果

46位(58%)胆道内镜专家回复了问卷。其中,63%在学术界工作,平均从业年限为16.4年(±8.6年)。内镜专家每月平均进行1.1例(±0.8例)壶腹切除术。在进行壶腹切除术之前,67%的受访者“总是”使用内镜超声,31%的受访者“有时”使用。经验性胆管括约肌切开术的使用并不统一,只有26%的人“总是”在切除术前进行,37%的人“有时”进行。53%的人报告在壶腹切除术之前“从未”进行过经验性胰管括约肌切开术。内镜逆行胰胆管造影术操作量高的从业者最有可能进行胰管括约肌切开术(比值比=10.9;P=0.09)。绝大多数参与者赞成“总是”放置预防性胰管支架,86%的人在壶腹切除术后放置,而不是在切除术前放置(23%)。氩等离子体凝固是去除残留腺瘤组织最常用的辅助方式(83%)。所有从业者(100%)都倾向于在壶腹切除术后6个月内进行随访检查。

结论

在胆道专家中,壶腹切除术操作的差异比文献中所反映的要小。

相似文献

1
A survey of ampullectomy practices.壶腹切除术实践调查。
World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul 28;15(28):3486-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3486.
4
Endoscopic ampullectomy: techniques and outcomes.内镜壶腹肿瘤切除术:技术与结果。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Jan;46(1):8-15. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318233a844.
9
Endoscopic ampullectomy.内镜下壶腹切除术。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2379-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00332.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Updates on the Management of Ampullary Neoplastic Lesions.壶腹肿瘤性病变的管理进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Oct 6;13(19):3138. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13193138.
5
Methods and outcome of the endoscopic treatment of ampullary tumors.壶腹肿瘤的内镜治疗方法及结果
Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jan 21;13:2631774519899786. doi: 10.1177/2631774519899786. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
8
Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions.壶腹腺瘤性病变的内镜治疗
World J Methodol. 2015 Sep 26;5(3):127-35. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i3.127.

本文引用的文献

1
Tumors of the Extrahepatic Bile-ducts.肝外胆管肿瘤
Ann Surg. 1931 Jul;94(1):61-79. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193107000-00007.
4
Endoscopic ampullectomy.内镜下壶腹切除术。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2379-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00332.x.
7
Factors predictive of malignancy and endoscopic resectability in ampullary neoplasia.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;99(12):2335-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40391.x.
8
9
Ampullary adenoma: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment.壶腹腺瘤:临床表现、诊断与治疗
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003 Oct;13(4):649-69. doi: 10.1016/s1052-5157(03)00101-6.
10
Endoscopic management of adenoma of the major duodenal papilla.十二指肠乳头腺瘤的内镜治疗
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Feb;59(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02366-6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验