• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估心胸外科的技术变革。

Assessing technological change in cardiothoracic surgery.

作者信息

Iribarne Alexander, Russo Mark J, Moskowitz Alan J, Ascheim Deborah D, Brown Lawrence D, Gelijns Annetine C

机构信息

International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research, Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Spring;21(1):28-34. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.05.001.

DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.05.001
PMID:19632560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2935793/
Abstract

Technological innovation--broadly defined as the development and introduction of new drugs, devices, and procedures--has played a major role in advancing the field of cardiothoracic surgery. It has generated new forms of care for patients and improved treatment options. Innovation, however, comes at a price. Total national health care expenditures now exceed $2 trillion per year in the United States and all current estimates indicate that this number will continue to rise. As we continue to seek the most innovative medical treatments for cardiovascular disease, the spiraling cost of these technologies comes to the forefront. In this article, we address 3 challenges in managing the health and economic impact of new and emerging technologies in cardiothoracic surgery: (1) challenges associated with the dynamics of technological growth itself; (2) challenges associated with methods of analysis; and (3) the ways in which value judgments and political factors shape the translation of evidence into policy. We conclude by discussing changes in the analytical, financial, and institutional realms that can improve evidence-based decision-making in cardiac surgery.

摘要

技术创新——广义上定义为新药、设备和手术方法的研发与引入——在推动心胸外科领域发展方面发挥了重要作用。它为患者带来了新的护理形式,改善了治疗选择。然而,创新是有代价的。美国目前全国医疗保健总支出每年超过2万亿美元,而且所有当前估计都表明这个数字将持续上升。在我们继续为心血管疾病寻求最具创新性的医疗治疗方法时,这些技术不断攀升的成本成为了首要问题。在本文中,我们探讨了在管理心胸外科新技术和新兴技术对健康及经济影响方面的三个挑战:(1)与技术增长动态本身相关的挑战;(2)与分析方法相关的挑战;(3)价值判断和政治因素影响证据转化为政策的方式。我们通过讨论分析、财务和机构领域的变化来结束本文,这些变化可以改善心脏外科基于证据的决策制定。

相似文献

1
Assessing technological change in cardiothoracic surgery.评估心胸外科的技术变革。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Spring;21(1):28-34. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.05.001.
2
Ethical, legal, and health policy challenges in contemporary cardiothoracic surgery: introduction.当代心胸外科手术中的伦理、法律及卫生政策挑战:引言
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Spring;21(1):1-2. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.04.002.
3
Medical innovation duels cost containment.医学创新与成本控制相互较量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):7-27. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.7.
4
Regional collaboration as a model for fostering accountability and transforming health care.区域合作作为促进问责制和变革医疗保健的一种模式。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Spring;21(1):12-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2009.03.005.
5
The dynamics of technological change in medicine.医学领域技术变革的动态
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):28-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.28.
6
Preserving the milieu for medical innovation.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Summer;13(3):112-4. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.3.112.
7
The influence of economic incentives and regulatory factors on the adoption of treatment technologies: a case study of technologies used to treat heart attacks.经济激励措施和监管因素对治疗技术采用的影响:以用于治疗心脏病发作的技术为例
Health Econ. 2009 Oct;18(10):1114-32. doi: 10.1002/hec.1417.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Federal efforts at reducing health care costs: the effect on technology, Part 2.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1990 Jul-Aug;24(4):249-53.
10
Special report: scarce resources in health care.特别报道:医疗保健中的稀缺资源
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1979 Spring;57(2):265-87.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses for cardiothoracic surgeons: part 7 - synthesizing evidence.心胸外科医生的系统评价与Meta分析:第7部分 - 证据综合
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jul;41(7):958-969. doi: 10.1007/s12055-025-01940-9. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Validating innovations to improve recovery after heart surgery.验证创新方法以改善心脏手术后的恢复情况。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Nov;6(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.09.23.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis in cardiac surgery: A review of its concepts and methodologies.心脏外科手术中的成本效益分析:概念与方法综述。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(4):1671-1681.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial.冠状动脉旁路移植术中静脉采集技术的选择:REGROUP试验的基本原理与设计
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):325-30. doi: 10.1002/clc.22267. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
5
A minimally invasive approach is more cost-effective than a traditional sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery.微创方法比传统胸骨切开术在二尖瓣手术中更具成本效益。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;142(6):1507-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.04.038. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
6
The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: current and future perspectives.微创心胸外科手术的黄金时代:现状与未来展望
Future Cardiol. 2011 May;7(3):333-46. doi: 10.2217/fca.11.23.
7
Integrating economic evaluation methods into clinical and translational science award consortium comparative effectiveness educational goals.将经济评价方法融入临床和转化科学奖联盟比较效果教育目标。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):701-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217cf25.
8
Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approach for mitral valve surgery: a propensity analysis.微创与胸骨切开术治疗二尖瓣手术:倾向评分分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Nov;90(5):1471-7; discussion 1477-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.06.034.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-of-illness analyses for policy making: a cautionary tale of use and misuse.用于政策制定的疾病成本分析:使用与误用的警示故事
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2003 Aug;3(4):367-9. doi: 10.1586/14737167.3.4.367.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗严重冠状动脉疾病的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 5;360(10):961-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
3
Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.医疗保健与《美国复苏与再投资法案》
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 12;360(11):1057-60. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0900665. Epub 2009 Feb 17.
4
Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.左心室辅助装置植入作为终末期治疗在 REMATCH 时代后的结局:对患者选择的启示。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
5
Hospital costs for left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy: lower costs for implantation in the post-REMATCH era.用于终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置的医院成本:后 REMATCH 时代植入成本降低。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Jul;25(7):778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.03.010.
6
INvestigation of STEnt grafts in patients with type B Aortic Dissection: design of the INSTEAD trial--a prospective, multicenter, European randomized trial.
Am Heart J. 2005 Apr;149(4):592-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.060.
7
Measurement of end points in heart failure trials: jousting at windmills?心力衰竭试验中终点指标的测量:对着风车作战?
Mt Sinai J Med. 2004 Oct;71(5):298-304.
8
Special report: cost-effectiveness of left-ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for end-stage heart failure.特别报告:左心室辅助装置作为终末期心力衰竭目标治疗的成本效益
Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ. 2004 Apr;19(2):1.
9
Decision analysis and economic modelling: a primer.决策分析与经济建模:入门指南。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jun;16(6):535-42. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200406000-00005.
10
Left ventricular assist devices as permanent heart failure therapy: the price of progress.作为永久性心力衰竭治疗手段的左心室辅助装置:进步的代价。
Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):577-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000090447.73384.ad.