Oz Mehmet C, Gelijns Annetine C, Miller Leslie, Wang Cuiling, Nickens Patrice, Arons Raymond, Aaronson Keith, Richenbacher Wayne, van Meter Clifford, Nelson Karl, Weinberg Alan, Watson John, Rose Eric A, Moskowitz Alan J
International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research and the Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):577-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000090447.73384.ad.
The REMATCH trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in stage D chronic end-stage heart failure patients. Compared with optimal medical management, LVAD implantation significantly improved the survival and quality of life of these terminally ill patients. To date, however, there have been no analyses of the cost related to the LVAD survival benefit. This paper addresses the cost of hospital resource use, and its predictors, for long-term LVAD patients.
Detailed cost data were available for 52 of 68 REMATCH patients randomized to LVAD therapy. We combined the clinical dataset with Medicare data, standard billing forms (UB-92), and line item bills provided directly by clinical centers. Charges were converted to costs by using the Ratio-of-Cost-to-Charges for each major resource category.
The mean cost for the initial implant-related hospitalization was $210,187 +/- 193,295. When implantation hospitalization costs are compared between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, the mean costs increase from $159,271 +/- 106,423 to $315,015 +/- 278,713. Sepsis, pump housing infection, and perioperative bleeding are the major drivers of implantation cost, established by regression modeling. In the patients who survived the procedure (n = 35), bypass time, perioperative bleeding, and late bleeding were the drivers of cost. The average annual readmission cost per patient for the overall cohort was $105,326.
The cost of long-term LVAD implantation is commensurate with other life-saving organ transplantation procedures like liver transplantation. As an evolving technology, there are a number of opportunities for improvement that will likely reduce costs in the future.
REMATCH试验评估了长期左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持对D期慢性终末期心力衰竭患者的疗效和安全性。与最佳药物治疗相比,LVAD植入显著提高了这些绝症患者的生存率和生活质量。然而,迄今为止,尚未对与LVAD生存获益相关的成本进行分析。本文探讨了长期LVAD患者的医院资源使用成本及其预测因素。
68例随机接受LVAD治疗的REMATCH患者中有52例可获得详细成本数据。我们将临床数据集与医疗保险数据、标准计费表单(UB - 92)以及临床中心直接提供的明细账单相结合。通过使用每个主要资源类别的成本与收费比率将收费转换为成本。
初次植入相关住院的平均成本为210,187美元±193,295美元。比较医院幸存者和非幸存者的植入住院成本时,平均成本从159,271美元±106,423美元增加到315,015美元±278,713美元。通过回归模型确定,脓毒症、泵壳感染和围手术期出血是植入成本的主要驱动因素。在手术存活的患者(n = 35)中,体外循环时间、围手术期出血和晚期出血是成本的驱动因素。整个队列中每位患者的平均年度再入院成本为105,326美元。
长期LVAD植入的成本与肝移植等其他挽救生命的器官移植手术相当。作为一项不断发展的技术,未来有许多改进机会可能会降低成本。