• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Left ventricular assist devices as permanent heart failure therapy: the price of progress.作为永久性心力衰竭治疗手段的左心室辅助装置:进步的代价。
Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):577-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000090447.73384.ad.
2
Better With Time: An Economic Assessment of Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Population Surviving at Least 1 Year with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.随着时间的推移而改善:在至少使用左心室辅助装置生存 1 年的人群中进行长期机械循环支持的经济评估。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(4):738-746. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
3
Hospital costs for left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy: lower costs for implantation in the post-REMATCH era.用于终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置的医院成本:后 REMATCH 时代植入成本降低。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Jul;25(7):778-84. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2006.03.010.
4
The cost of long-term LVAD implantation.长期左心室辅助装置植入的费用。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3 Suppl):S195-8; discussion S203-4. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02621-7.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.心力衰竭终末期患者经皮植入左心室辅助装置的成本效益分析。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection.左心室辅助装置植入作为终末期治疗在 REMATCH 时代后的结局:对患者选择的启示。
Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):497-505. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.691972. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
7
Temporal changes in hospital costs for left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术医院费用的时间变化。
J Card Surg. 2011 Sep;26(5):535-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01292.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
8
Heart transplant and left ventricular assist device costs.心脏移植和左心室辅助装置的费用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Feb;24(2):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2003.11.397.
9
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.左心室辅助装置植入术后的当代医院再入院情况:一项大型单中心研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy.连续血流左心室辅助装置作为终末期心力衰竭治疗的成本效果分析。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Jan;5(1):10-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962951. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review.作为终末期治疗的左心室辅助装置(LVADs)的成本效益:一项系统评价。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 May;9(3):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00564-4. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Recent Developments in Ventricular Assist Device Therapy.心室辅助装置治疗的最新进展
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 14;26(1):25440. doi: 10.31083/RCM25440. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.左心室辅助装置作为晚期心力衰竭的终末期治疗的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009.
4
The Prognostic Role of Spot Urinary Sodium and Chloride in a Cohort of Hospitalized Advanced Heart Failure Patients: A Pilot Study.即时尿钠和氯在一组住院晚期心力衰竭患者中的预后作用:一项初步研究。
Life (Basel). 2023 Mar 5;13(3):698. doi: 10.3390/life13030698.
5
Ventricular Assist Device-Specific Infections.心室辅助装置相关感染
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 25;10(3):453. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030453.
6
Understanding and Addressing Variation in Health Care-Associated Infections After Durable Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.理解并应对持续性心室辅助装置治疗后医疗相关感染的差异:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e14701. doi: 10.2196/14701.
7
Cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices for patients with end-stage heart failure: analysis of the French hospital discharge database.左心室辅助装置治疗终末期心力衰竭患者的成本效益:法国住院数据库分析。
ESC Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;5(1):75-86. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12194. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
Past and Present of Total Artificial Heart Therapy: A Success Story.全人工心脏治疗的过去与现在:一个成功的故事
Med Sci Monit Basic Res. 2015 Sep 7;21:183-90. doi: 10.12659/MSMBR.895418.
9
Readmission due to driveline infection can be predicted by new score by using serum albumin and body mass index during long-term left ventricular assist device support.在长期左心室辅助装置支持期间,通过使用血清白蛋白和体重指数的新评分可以预测因驱动线感染导致的再次入院情况。
J Artif Organs. 2015 Jun;18(2):120-7. doi: 10.1007/s10047-015-0816-2. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Mechanical circulatory support devices as destination therapy-current evidence.机械循环支持装置作为终末期治疗的选择:当前证据。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Sep;3(5):513-24. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.08.20.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of symptomatic venous thromboembolism: improving outcomes.有症状静脉血栓栓塞症的治疗:改善治疗效果
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2002 Jun;28 Suppl 2:41-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32315.
2
Mechanical cardiac-support devices--dreams and devilish details.机械心脏支持设备——梦想与棘手的细节
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1490-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMed010109.
3
Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.终末期心力衰竭患者长期使用左心室辅助装置。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012175.
4
Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: effect of patient selection on outcome.
Circulation. 2001 Jan 16;103(2):231-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.2.231.
5
Resource utilization in liver transplantation: effects of patient characteristics and clinical practice. NIDDK Liver Transplantation Database Group.肝移植中的资源利用:患者特征和临床实践的影响。美国国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所肝移植数据库组。
JAMA. 1999 Apr 21;281(15):1381-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.15.1381.
6
The REMATCH trial: rationale, design, and end points. Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure.REMATCH试验:基本原理、设计与终点。充血性心力衰竭机械辅助治疗的随机评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Mar;67(3):723-30. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00042-9.
7
Capturing the unexpected benefits of medical research.获取医学研究的意外益处。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):693-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391010.
8
Evolving costs of long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.长期左心室辅助装置植入成本的不断变化
Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Nov;64(5):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00854-0.
9
Selective anticoagulation with active site blocked factor IXa in synthetic patch vascular repair results in decreased blood loss and operative time.在合成补片血管修复中使用活性位点被阻断的因子IXa进行选择性抗凝可减少失血量并缩短手术时间。
ASAIO J. 1997 Sep-Oct;43(5):M526-30.
10
A randomized controlled trial of epoprostenol therapy for severe congestive heart failure: The Flolan International Randomized Survival Trial (FIRST).
Am Heart J. 1997 Jul;134(1):44-54. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70105-4.

作为永久性心力衰竭治疗手段的左心室辅助装置:进步的代价。

Left ventricular assist devices as permanent heart failure therapy: the price of progress.

作者信息

Oz Mehmet C, Gelijns Annetine C, Miller Leslie, Wang Cuiling, Nickens Patrice, Arons Raymond, Aaronson Keith, Richenbacher Wayne, van Meter Clifford, Nelson Karl, Weinberg Alan, Watson John, Rose Eric A, Moskowitz Alan J

机构信息

International Center for Health Outcomes and Innovation Research and the Department of Surgery, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):577-83; discussion 583-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000090447.73384.ad.

DOI:10.1097/01.sla.0000090447.73384.ad
PMID:14530729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1360116/
Abstract

BACKGROUND DATA

The REMATCH trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support in stage D chronic end-stage heart failure patients. Compared with optimal medical management, LVAD implantation significantly improved the survival and quality of life of these terminally ill patients. To date, however, there have been no analyses of the cost related to the LVAD survival benefit. This paper addresses the cost of hospital resource use, and its predictors, for long-term LVAD patients.

METHODS

Detailed cost data were available for 52 of 68 REMATCH patients randomized to LVAD therapy. We combined the clinical dataset with Medicare data, standard billing forms (UB-92), and line item bills provided directly by clinical centers. Charges were converted to costs by using the Ratio-of-Cost-to-Charges for each major resource category.

RESULTS

The mean cost for the initial implant-related hospitalization was $210,187 +/- 193,295. When implantation hospitalization costs are compared between hospital survivors and nonsurvivors, the mean costs increase from $159,271 +/- 106,423 to $315,015 +/- 278,713. Sepsis, pump housing infection, and perioperative bleeding are the major drivers of implantation cost, established by regression modeling. In the patients who survived the procedure (n = 35), bypass time, perioperative bleeding, and late bleeding were the drivers of cost. The average annual readmission cost per patient for the overall cohort was $105,326.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost of long-term LVAD implantation is commensurate with other life-saving organ transplantation procedures like liver transplantation. As an evolving technology, there are a number of opportunities for improvement that will likely reduce costs in the future.

摘要

背景数据

REMATCH试验评估了长期左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持对D期慢性终末期心力衰竭患者的疗效和安全性。与最佳药物治疗相比,LVAD植入显著提高了这些绝症患者的生存率和生活质量。然而,迄今为止,尚未对与LVAD生存获益相关的成本进行分析。本文探讨了长期LVAD患者的医院资源使用成本及其预测因素。

方法

68例随机接受LVAD治疗的REMATCH患者中有52例可获得详细成本数据。我们将临床数据集与医疗保险数据、标准计费表单(UB - 92)以及临床中心直接提供的明细账单相结合。通过使用每个主要资源类别的成本与收费比率将收费转换为成本。

结果

初次植入相关住院的平均成本为210,187美元±193,295美元。比较医院幸存者和非幸存者的植入住院成本时,平均成本从159,271美元±106,423美元增加到315,015美元±278,713美元。通过回归模型确定,脓毒症、泵壳感染和围手术期出血是植入成本的主要驱动因素。在手术存活的患者(n = 35)中,体外循环时间、围手术期出血和晚期出血是成本的驱动因素。整个队列中每位患者的平均年度再入院成本为105,326美元。

结论

长期LVAD植入的成本与肝移植等其他挽救生命的器官移植手术相当。作为一项不断发展的技术,未来有许多改进机会可能会降低成本。