Engelken Florian J F, Meyer Henning, Juran Ralf, Bick Ulrich, Fallenberg Eva, Diekmann Felix
Institut für Radiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct;16(10):1272-80. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
The aim of this study was to compare average glandular dose (AGD) in two full-field digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Mammographies of 50 consecutive patients on a mammography system using a tungsten/rhodium (W/Rh) anode/filter combination were retrospectively compared to prior examinations on a different mammography unit using combinations of Molybdenum (Mo) and Rhodium (Rh). To exclude effects of increasing patient age, two prior examinations within 5 years were used. Both views of one breast were chosen for analysis. AGD was recorded as stated by each mammography unit. Accuracy of stated AGD and contrast-detail resolution were assessed using different breast phantoms.
The mean AGDs from the examinations using W/Rh were 0.95 mGy and 1.01 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views compared to 1.51 mGy and 1.54 mGy, respectively, using combinations of Mo and Rh (P < .001). Relative reduction of AGD was independent of breast thickness but decreased with increasing breast density (partial correlation coefficient of 0.46, P < .005 and 0.57, P < .001, for CC and MLO views, respectively). Low-level contrast resolution was equal in both units using standard acquisition parameters.
In clinical mammographies, higher energy beam spectra obtained using W/Rh anode/filter combinations may significantly contribute to lowering AGD compared to Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh in breasts that are not extremely dense.
本研究旨在比较使用不同阳极/滤过组合的两种全视野数字化乳腺摄影设备的平均腺体剂量(AGD)。
回顾性比较了在一台使用钨/铑(W/Rh)阳极/滤过组合的乳腺摄影系统上对50例连续患者进行的乳腺摄影检查结果与在另一台使用钼(Mo)和铑(Rh)不同组合的乳腺摄影设备上进行的先前检查结果。为排除患者年龄增长的影响,选取了5年内的两次先前检查。选择一侧乳房的两个投照体位进行分析。各乳腺摄影设备记录的AGD值。使用不同的乳房模型评估记录的AGD值的准确性和对比细节分辨力。
使用W/Rh进行检查时,头尾位(CC)和内外斜位(MLO)投照的平均AGD分别为0.95 mGy和1.01 mGy,而使用Mo和Rh组合时分别为1.51 mGy和1.54 mGy(P <.001)。AGD的相对降低与乳房厚度无关,但随乳房密度增加而降低(CC和MLO投照的偏相关系数分别为0.46,P <.005和0.57,P <.001)。使用标准采集参数时,两个设备的低对比度分辨力相同。
在临床乳腺摄影中,对于密度不是极高的乳房,使用W/Rh阳极/滤过组合获得的较高能量束光谱可能显著有助于降低AGD,相比Mo/Mo、Mo/Rh和Rh/Rh组合。