• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term effectiveness of a comprehensive pain management program: strengthening the case for interdisciplinary care.综合疼痛管理计划的长期有效性:强化跨学科护理的理由
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2009 Jul;22(3):211-4. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2009.11928516.
2
Short-Term Functional, Emotional, and Pain Outcomes of Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Treated in a Comprehensive Interdisciplinary Pain Management Program.在综合多学科疼痛管理项目中接受治疗的复杂性区域疼痛综合征患者的短期功能、情绪和疼痛结局
Pain Med. 2015 Dec;16(12):2357-67. doi: 10.1111/pme.12817. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
4
Evaluation of an interdisciplinary chronic pain program and predictors of readiness for change.一项跨学科慢性疼痛项目的评估及改变意愿的预测因素
Can J Pain. 2019 Apr 12;3(1):70-78. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2019.1582296. eCollection 2019.
5
A cost-utility analysis of chronic spinal pain treatment outcomes: converting SF-36 data into quality-adjusted life years.慢性脊柱疼痛治疗结果的成本-效用分析:将SF-36数据转换为质量调整生命年
Clin J Pain. 2006 Oct;22(8):700-11. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210934.66063.22.
6
A preoperative interdisciplinary biopsychosocial opioid reduction program in patients on chronic opioid analgesia prior to spine surgery: A preliminary report and case series.脊柱手术前慢性阿片类药物镇痛患者的术前跨学科生物心理社会阿片类药物减量计划:初步报告及病例系列
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
7
Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer.针对成年癌症患者症状管理的电话干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 2;6(6):CD007568. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2.
8
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
9
Interdisciplinary treatment for fibromyalgia syndrome: clinical and statistical significance.
Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Jun;11(3):186-95. doi: 10.1002/art.1790110306.
10
Predictive validity of the pain and impairment relationship scale in a chronic nonmalignant pain population.疼痛与功能障碍关系量表在慢性非恶性疼痛人群中的预测效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Jan;80(1):91-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90313-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic pain and decline in activities of daily living among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.社区居住老年人的慢性疼痛与日常生活活动能力下降:纵向研究的系统综述
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01299-5.
2
Identifying Latent Profiles of Healthy Adults' Biopsychosocial Pain Concepts.识别健康成年人生物心理社会疼痛概念的潜在特征。
Pain Res Manag. 2025 May 9;2025:5706849. doi: 10.1155/prm/5706849. eCollection 2025.
3
Relationship Between Psychological Factors and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛患者心理因素与健康相关生活质量的关系
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 15;12(24):2531. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12242531.
4
Integration of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Patients with Chronic Pain.整脊手法治疗慢性疼痛患者的整合。
Mo Med. 2024 Jan-Feb;121(1):76-80.
5
[An instrument to assess biopsychosocial pain concepts in adults : Development and evaluation by experts].[一种评估成人生物心理社会疼痛概念的工具:专家进行的开发与评估]
Schmerz. 2025 Jun;39(3):194-203. doi: 10.1007/s00482-024-00793-2. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
6
Evaluation of a non-pharmacological interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation and functional restoration program for chronic pain in veterans.评估一种非药物的跨学科疼痛康复和功能恢复计划对退伍军人慢性疼痛的效果。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;58(2):365-374. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14062. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
7
Long term outcomes of chronic pain patients attending a publicly funded community-based interdisciplinary pain program in the Greater Toronto area: results of a practice-based audit.在大多伦多地区参加由公共资金资助的社区跨学科疼痛项目的慢性疼痛患者的长期预后:一项基于实践的审计结果
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 May 7;6(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00452-z.
8
Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的跨学科多模式疼痛治疗方案的纵向结局评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Feb;26(2):310-335. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1875. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
9
Effectiveness and harms of clinical decision support systems for referral within chronic pain practice: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.临床决策支持系统在慢性疼痛治疗中的转诊效果和危害:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 9;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01596-7.
10
Translation and Validation of the Farsi Version of the Pain Management Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.疼痛管理自我效能量表波斯语版本的翻译与验证
J Pain Res. 2020 Apr 7;13:719-727. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S246077. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pain management programme managing chronic pain.多学科疼痛管理方案对慢性疼痛的管理效果。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2004 Oct;10(5):224-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2004.00485.x.
2
Long-term outcomes in multidisciplinary treatment of chronic low back pain: results of a 13-year follow-up.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 15;29(8):850-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00006.
3
A prospective one-year outcome study of interdisciplinary chronic pain management: compromising its efficacy by managed care policies.一项跨学科慢性疼痛管理的前瞻性一年期结局研究:管理式医疗政策对其疗效的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):156-62, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000058886.87431.32.
4
Treatment outcome of chronic non-malignant pain patients managed in a danish multidisciplinary pain centre compared to general practice: a randomised controlled trial.与全科医疗相比,丹麦多学科疼痛中心对慢性非恶性疼痛患者的治疗效果:一项随机对照试验。
Pain. 2000 Feb;84(2-3):203-11. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00209-2.
5
Effects of a cognitive-behavioral pain-management program.认知行为疼痛管理项目的效果
Behav Res Ther. 1998 Oct;36(10):915-30. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00079-5.
6
The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI).西黑文-耶鲁多维疼痛量表(WHYMPI)。
Pain. 1985 Dec;23(4):345-356. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90004-1.
7
Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review.多学科疼痛治疗中心的疗效:一项荟萃分析综述
Pain. 1992 May;49(2):221-230. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90145-2.

综合疼痛管理计划的长期有效性:强化跨学科护理的理由

Long-term effectiveness of a comprehensive pain management program: strengthening the case for interdisciplinary care.

作者信息

Oslund Sarah, Robinson Richard C, Clark Timothy C, Garofalo John P, Behnk Pamela, Walker Becky, Walker Katherine E, Gatchel Robert J, Mahaney Micah, Noe Carl E

机构信息

Division of Psychology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2009 Jul;22(3):211-4. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2009.11928516.

DOI:10.1080/08998280.2009.11928516
PMID:19633738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2709080/
Abstract

Chronic pain, a debilitating medical condition affecting approximately 15% of the US population, leads to individual suffering and costs to society in terms of health care dollars and lost productivity. To examine the effectiveness of a comprehensive pain management program, data from 108 program participants were evaluated. Preprogram, postprogram, and 6-month follow-up data were collected from 80 participants, and preprogram, postprogram, and 1-year data were collected from 46 participants. Outcomes data from several domains were assessed: pain severity, emotional distress, interference of pain on function, perceived control of pain, treatment helpfulness, and number of hours resting. Within-subject repeated-measure analyses of variance found statistically significant findings on the six outcome measures utilized in this study for both the 6-month and 1-year samples. Examination of 95% confidence intervals revealed no overlap in pretreatment scores with 6-month and 1-year outcomes in five of the six domains studied. Mean scores on emotional distress did not maintain statistical significance in the 6-month or 1-year review. Overall, this study strengthens the case for interdisciplinary care for chronic pain management and provides evidence for the long-term effectiveness of this therapy. Furthermore, this study lends support to the notion that interdisciplinary treatments are effective in targeting multiple domains affected by the pain condition.

摘要

慢性疼痛是一种使人衰弱的病症,影响着约15%的美国人口,会导致个人痛苦,并在医疗费用和生产力损失方面给社会带来成本。为了检验一项综合疼痛管理计划的有效性,对108名计划参与者的数据进行了评估。从80名参与者那里收集了计划前、计划后以及6个月随访的数据,从46名参与者那里收集了计划前、计划后以及1年的数据。对几个领域的结果数据进行了评估:疼痛严重程度、情绪困扰、疼痛对功能的干扰、对疼痛的感知控制、治疗的帮助程度以及休息时长。本研究使用的六个结果指标的受试者内重复测量方差分析在6个月和1年样本中均发现了具有统计学意义的结果。对95%置信区间的检查显示,在六个研究领域中的五个领域,治疗前分数与6个月和1年的结果没有重叠。在6个月或1年的复查中,情绪困扰的平均分数没有保持统计学意义。总体而言,本研究强化了对慢性疼痛管理进行跨学科护理的理由,并为这种疗法的长期有效性提供了证据。此外,本研究支持了跨学科治疗在针对受疼痛状况影响的多个领域方面有效的观点。