Giraldez Roberto R, Wiviott Stephen D, Nicolau Jose C, Mohanavelu Satishkumar, Morrow David A, Antman Elliott M, Giugliano Robert P
TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Drugs. 2009 Jul 30;69(11):1433-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969110-00003.
Enoxaparin was superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH), regardless of fibrinolytic agent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy in ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 25) trial.
This post hoc analysis compared outcomes with streptokinase plus enoxaparin to the standard regimen of fibrin-specific lytic (FSL) plus UFH and to the newer combination of FSL plus enoxaparin.
In ExTRACT-TIMI 25, STEMI patients received either streptokinase or a FSL (alteplase, reteplase or tenecteplase) at the physician's discretion and were randomized to enoxaparin or UFH, stratified by fibrinolytic type. Thirty-day outcomes were adjusted for baseline characteristics, region, in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and a propensity score for the choice of lytic.
The primary trial endpoint of 30-day death/myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in fewer patients in the streptokinase-enoxaparin cohort (n = 2083) compared with FSL-UFH (n = 8141) [10.2% vs 12.0%, adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)] 0.76; 95% CI 0.62, 0.93; p = 0.008]. Major bleeding was significantly increased with streptokinase-enoxaparin compared with FSL-UFH (OR(adj) 2.74; 95% CI 1.81; 4.14; p < 0.001) but intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) was similar (OR(adj) 0.90; 95% CI 0.40, 2.01; p = 0.79). Net clinical outcomes, defined as either death/MI/major bleeding or as death/MI/ICH tended to favour streptokinase-enoxaparin compared with FSL-UFH (OR(adj) 0.88; 95% CI 0.73, 1.06; p = 0.17; and OR(adj) 0.77; 95% CI 0.63, 0.93; p = 0.008, respectively). Patients receiving FSL-enoxaparin (n = 8142) and streptokinase-enoxaparin therapies experienced similar adjusted rates of the primary endpoint (OR(adj) 1.08; 95% CI 0.87, 1.32; p = 0.49) and net clinical outcomes.
Our results suggest that fibrinolytic therapy with the combination of streptokinase and the potent anticoagulant agent enoxaparin resulted in similar adjusted outcomes compared with more costly regimens utilizing a FSL.
在“急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗-心肌梗死25(ExTRACT-TIMI 25)”试验中,接受溶栓治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,无论使用何种纤溶药物,依诺肝素均优于普通肝素(UFH)。
本事后分析比较了链激酶加依诺肝素与纤溶特异性溶栓剂(FSL)加UFH的标准方案以及FSL加依诺肝素的新组合的疗效。
在ExTRACT-TIMI 25试验中,STEMI患者由医生酌情决定接受链激酶或FSL(阿替普酶、瑞替普酶或替奈普酶)治疗,并根据纤溶类型分层随机分配至依诺肝素或UFH组。对30天的结局进行基线特征、地区、院内经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)以及溶栓剂选择倾向评分的校正。
与FSL-UFH组(n = 8141)相比,链激酶-依诺肝素组(n = 2083)30天死亡/心肌梗死(MI)这一主要试验终点的患者较少[10.2%对12.0%,校正优势比[OR(adj)]0.76;95%可信区间0.62至0.93;p = 0.008]。与FSL-UFH相比,链激酶-依诺肝素组的大出血显著增加(OR(adj)2.74;95%可信区间1.81至4.14;p < 0.001),但颅内出血(ICH)情况相似(OR(adj)0.90;95%可信区间0.40至2.01;p = 0.79)。定义为死亡/MI/大出血或死亡/MI/ICH的净临床结局与FSL-UFH相比,倾向于链激酶-依诺肝素组(分别为OR(adj)0.88;95%可信区间0.73至1.06;p = 0.17;以及OR(adj)0.77;95%可信区间(0.63至0.93;p = 0.008)。接受FSL-依诺肝素(n = 8142)和链激酶-依诺肝素治疗的患者,主要终点的校正发生率相似(OR(adj)1.08;9%可信区间0.87至1.32;p = 0.49),净临床结局也相似。
我们的结果表明,链激酶与强效抗凝剂依诺肝素联合进行的溶栓治疗,与使用FSL的更昂贵方案相比,校正后的结局相似。