• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达托霉素与万古霉素及庆大霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症和/或心内膜炎患者的成本效益

Cost-Effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin and gentamicin for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and/or endocarditis.

作者信息

Bhavnani S M, Prakhya A, Hammel J P, Ambrose P G

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Pharmacodynamics at Ordway Research Institute, Albany, New York, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 1;49(5):691-8. doi: 10.1086/604710.

DOI:10.1086/604710
PMID:19635023
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasingly common cause of bacteremia and endocarditis. The cost-effectiveness (CE) of daptomycin was compared with that of vancomycin-gentamicin in patients with MRSA bacteremia with or without endocarditis.

METHODS

With use of data from an open-label, randomized study comparing daptomycin with vancomycin-gentamicin in the aforementioned patient population, 3 cost strata were considered: (1) study drug acquisition (daptomycin, $0.37/mg; vancomycin, $7/g; and gentamicin, $0.12/mg); (2) stratum 1 plus the cost of therapy for treatment failures and adverse events, therapeutic drug monitoring, and preparation and administration of all medications; and (3) stratum 2 plus hospital bed costs. Drug costs were based on mean wholesale price, with other costs based on those for a typical community hospital. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as cost divided by proportion of successes. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the study drug cost.

RESULTS

Forty-five (20 successes) and 44 (14 successes) patients received daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin, respectively. The respective median cost-effectiveness ratios for daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin for each cost stratum were as follows: $4082 (range, $1062-$13,893) and $560 (range, $66-$1649) for stratum 1 (P < .001); $4582 (range, $1109-$21,882) and $1635 (range, $163-$33,444) for stratum 2 (P = .026); $23,639 (range, $6225-$141,132) and $26,073 (range, $5349-$187,287) for stratum 3 (P = .82). Sensitivity analyses indicated that if the cost of vancomycin was $0, strata 3 cost-effectiveness ratios did not differ ($23,639 and $25,668, respectively; P = .85). Similar results between groups were seen among patients with bacteremia.

CONCLUSIONS

When all costs of therapy were considered, the cost-effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin was similar, even if the cost of vancomycin was $0.

摘要

背景

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是菌血症和心内膜炎日益常见的病因。在患有或未患有心内膜炎的MRSA菌血症患者中,比较了达托霉素与万古霉素 - 庆大霉素的成本效益(CE)。

方法

利用一项开放标签、随机研究的数据,该研究在上述患者群体中比较了达托霉素与万古霉素 - 庆大霉素,考虑了3个成本层次:(1)研究药物采购(达托霉素,0.37美元/毫克;万古霉素,7美元/克;庆大霉素,0.12美元/毫克);(2)层次1加上治疗失败和不良事件的治疗成本、治疗药物监测以及所有药物的配制和给药成本;(3)层次2加上医院床位成本。药物成本基于平均批发价格,其他成本基于典型社区医院的成本。成本效益比计算为成本除以成功比例。通过改变研究药物成本进行敏感性分析。

结果

分别有45例(20例成功)和44例(14例成功)患者接受了达托霉素和万古霉素 - 庆大霉素治疗。每个成本层次下达托霉素和万古霉素 - 庆大霉素各自的中位数成本效益比分别如下:层次1为4082美元(范围为1062 - 13893美元)和560美元(范围为66 - 1649美元)(P < 0.001);层次2为4582美元(范围为1109 - 21882美元)和1635美元(范围为163 - 33444美元)(P = 0.026);层次3为23639美元(范围为6225 - 141132美元)和26073美元(范围为5349 - 187287美元)(P = 0.82)。敏感性分析表明,如果万古霉素成本为0,层次3的成本效益比没有差异(分别为23639美元和25668美元;P = 0.85)。在菌血症患者组之间也观察到类似结果。

结论

当考虑所有治疗成本时,即使万古霉素成本为0,达托霉素和万古霉素 - 庆大霉素的成本效益也相似。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin and gentamicin for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and/or endocarditis.达托霉素与万古霉素及庆大霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症和/或心内膜炎患者的成本效益
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Sep 1;49(5):691-8. doi: 10.1086/604710.
2
[Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with daptomycin or vancomycin].[达托霉素或万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的药物经济学分析]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2012 Dec;25(4):283-92.
3
Initial low-dose gentamicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and endocarditis is nephrotoxic.用于治疗金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症和心内膜炎的初始低剂量庆大霉素具有肾毒性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Mar 15;48(6):713-21. doi: 10.1086/597031.
4
Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.达托霉素与标准疗法治疗金黄色葡萄球菌引起的菌血症和心内膜炎的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 17;355(7):653-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa053783.
5
Outcomes and costs associated with a history of vancomycin exposure in patients with MRSA-related complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis.万古霉素暴露史与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌相关复杂性菌血症和感染性心内膜炎患者的结局和成本。
Clin Ther. 2011 Oct;33(10):1475-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
6
Daptomycin versus vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections: clinical and economic outcomes.达托霉素与万古霉素治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染:临床及经济结果
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Dec;27(12):1611-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.12.1611.
7
Cost-effectiveness of telavancin versus vancomycin for treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.替考拉宁与万古霉素治疗复杂性皮肤及皮肤结构感染的成本效益分析
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Dec;28(12):1471-82. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.12.1471.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: complicated skin and skin structure infection using Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis.利奈唑胺、达托霉素和万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的成本效益分析:采用贝叶斯方法进行证据综合的复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):631-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.006. Epub 2011 May 8.
9
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis with paravalvular abscess treated with daptomycin.用达托霉素治疗的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌人工主动脉瓣心内膜炎合并瓣周脓肿
Heart Lung. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):69-71. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2004.07.009.
10
Daptomycin therapy failure in an adolescent with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.一名患有耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的青少年使用达托霉素治疗失败。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 May;28(5):445-7. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181927891.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of efficacy and safety between daptomycin plus β-lactam and daptomycin monotherapy for bloodstream infections due to gram-positive cocci: A systematic review and meta-analysis.达托霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物与达托霉素单药治疗革兰氏阳性球菌血流感染的疗效和安全性比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29811. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29811. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
2
Daptomycin versus Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Bloodstream Infection with or without Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.达托霉素与万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林血流感染伴或不伴心内膜炎的系统评价和荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Aug 21;10(8):1014. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10081014.
3
High-Dose Daptomycin and Clinical Applications.
高剂量达托霉素及其临床应用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2021 Nov;55(11):1363-1378. doi: 10.1177/1060028021991943. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
4
Assessing the Role of Daptomycin as Antibiotic Therapy for Staphylococcal Prosthetic Joint Infection.评估达托霉素作为葡萄球菌人工关节感染抗生素治疗的作用。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2020 Mar 30;5(2):82-88. doi: 10.7150/jbji.41278. eCollection 2020.
5
Controversies in Antimicrobial Stewardship: Focus on New Rapid Diagnostic Technologies and Antimicrobials.抗菌药物管理的争议:聚焦新的快速诊断技术和抗菌药物。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2016 Jan 14;5(1):6. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics5010006.
6
Infective endocarditis in Ethiopian children: a hospital based review of cases in Addis Ababa.埃塞俄比亚儿童感染性心内膜炎:基于亚的斯亚贝巴一家医院的病例回顾
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Jan 28;20:75. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.20.75.4696. eCollection 2015.
7
Cost-effectiveness and pricing of antibacterial drugs.抗菌药物的成本效益与定价
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2015 Jan;85(1):4-13. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12417.
8
Use of daptomycin in complicated cases of infective endocarditis.使用达托霉素治疗感染性心内膜炎的复杂病例。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;30(6):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1160-y. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
9
Multiresistant bacteria and current therapy - the economical side of the story.耐药菌与当前疗法 - 从经济学角度看问题。
Eur J Med Res. 2010 Nov 30;15(12):571-6. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-12-571.