Vemuri P, Wiste H J, Weigand S D, Shaw L M, Trojanowski J Q, Weiner M W, Knopman D S, Petersen R C, Jack C R
Aging and Dementia Imaging Research Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Neurology. 2009 Jul 28;73(4):294-301. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181af79fb.
To investigate the relationship between baseline MRI and CSF biomarkers and subsequent change in continuous measures of cognitive and functional abilities in cognitively normal (CN) subjects and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) and to examine the ability of these biomarkers to predict time to conversion from aMCI to AD.
Data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, which consists of CN, aMCI, and AD cohorts with both CSF and MRI, were used. Baseline CSF (t-tau, Abeta(1-42), and p-tau(181P)) and MRI scans were obtained in 399 subjects (109 CN, 192 aMCI, 98 AD). Structural Abnormality Index (STAND) scores, which reflect the degree of AD-like features in MRI, were computed for each subject.
Change on continuous measures of cognitive and functional performance was modeled as average Clinical Dementia Rating-sum of boxes and Mini-Mental State Examination scores over a 2-year period. STAND was a better predictor of subsequent cognitive/functional change than CSF biomarkers. Single-predictor Cox proportional hazard models for time to conversion from aMCI to AD showed that STAND and log (t-tau/Abeta(1-42)) were both predictive of future conversion. The age-adjusted hazard ratio for an interquartile change (95% confidence interval) of STAND was 2.6 (1.7, 4.2) and log (t-tau/Abeta(1-42)) was 2.0 (1.1, 3.4). Both MRI and CSF provided information about future cognitive change even after adjusting for baseline cognitive performance.
MRI and CSF provide complimentary predictive information about time to conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease and combination of the 2 provides better prediction than either source alone. However, we found that MRI was a slightly better predictor of future clinical/functional decline than the CSF biomarkers tested.
研究认知正常(CN)受试者、遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)患者及阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的基线磁共振成像(MRI)和脑脊液生物标志物与认知及功能能力连续测量指标后续变化之间的关系,并检验这些生物标志物预测aMCI向AD转化时间的能力。
使用来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学计划的数据,该计划包括有脑脊液和MRI检查的CN、aMCI和AD队列。对399名受试者(109名CN、192名aMCI、98名AD)进行了基线脑脊液(总tau蛋白、β淀粉样蛋白1-42、磷酸化tau蛋白181P)和MRI扫描。计算了反映MRI中AD样特征程度的结构异常指数(STAND)得分。
认知和功能表现的连续测量指标变化被建模为2年期间平均临床痴呆评定量表框项总和及简易精神状态检查得分。STAND比脑脊液生物标志物能更好地预测后续认知/功能变化。从aMCI向AD转化时间的单预测因素Cox比例风险模型显示,STAND和log(总tau蛋白/β淀粉样蛋白1-42)均能预测未来转化。STAND四分位间距变化(95%置信区间)的年龄调整风险比为2.6(1.7,4.2),log(总tau蛋白/β淀粉样蛋白1-42)为2.0(1.1,3.4)。即使在调整基线认知表现后,MRI和脑脊液均提供了有关未来认知变化的信息。
MRI和脑脊液提供了关于从遗忘型轻度认知障碍向阿尔茨海默病转化时间的互补预测信息,两者结合比单独使用任何一种来源能提供更好的预测。然而,我们发现MRI比所检测的脑脊液生物标志物能稍好地预测未来临床/功能衰退。