Center for the Study of Human Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, NO-0317 Oslo, Norway.
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 10;30(6):2088-101. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3785-09.2010.
Brain atrophy and altered CSF levels of amyloid beta (Abeta(42)) and the microtubule-associated protein tau are potent biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related pathology. However, the relationship between CSF biomarkers and brain morphometry is poorly understood. Thus, we addressed the following questions. (1) Can CSF biomarker levels explain the morphometric differences between normal controls (NC) and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD? (2) How are CSF biomarkers related to atrophy across the brain? (3) How closely are CSF biomarkers and morphometry related to clinical change [clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR-sb)]? Three hundred seventy participants (105 NC, 175 MCI, 90 AD) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative were studied, of whom 309 were followed for 1 year and 176 for 2 years. Analyses were performed across the entire cortical surface, as well as for 30 cortical and subcortical regions of interest. Results showed that CSF biomarker levels could not account for group differences in brain morphometry at baseline but that CSF biomarker levels showed moderate relationships to longitudinal atrophy rates in numerous brain areas, not restricted to medial temporal structures. Baseline morphometry was at least as predictive of atrophy as were CSF biomarkers. Even MCI patients with levels of Abeta(42) comparable with controls and of p-tau lower than controls showed more atrophy than the controls. Morphometry predicted change in CDR-sb better than did CSF biomarkers. These results indicate that morphometric changes in MCI and AD are not secondary to CSF biomarker changes and that the two types of biomarkers yield complementary information.
脑萎缩和脑脊液中淀粉样β(Abeta(42))和微管相关蛋白 tau 的水平改变是阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关病理的有力生物标志物。然而,脑脊液生物标志物与脑形态计量学之间的关系尚未完全清楚。因此,我们提出了以下问题。(1)脑脊液生物标志物水平能否解释正常对照组(NC)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)或 AD 患者之间的形态计量学差异?(2)脑脊液生物标志物与大脑萎缩之间的关系如何?(3)脑脊液生物标志物和形态计量学与临床变化[临床痴呆评定量表总和分(CDR-sb)]的关系有多密切?我们研究了来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议的 370 名参与者(105 名 NC,175 名 MCI,90 名 AD),其中 309 名参与者在 1 年内进行了随访,176 名参与者在 2 年内进行了随访。分析在整个皮质表面以及 30 个皮质和皮质下感兴趣区域进行。结果表明,脑脊液生物标志物水平不能解释基线时脑形态计量学的组间差异,但脑脊液生物标志物水平与多个脑区的纵向萎缩率呈中度相关,而不限于内侧颞叶结构。基线形态计量学与脑脊液标志物一样能够预测萎缩。甚至 Abeta(42)水平与对照组相当且 p-tau 水平低于对照组的 MCI 患者也比对照组表现出更多的萎缩。形态计量学比脑脊液标志物更能预测 CDR-sb 的变化。这些结果表明,MCI 和 AD 中的形态计量学变化不是由脑脊液标志物变化引起的,而且这两种类型的生物标志物提供了互补信息。