Stone Trevor W, Ceruti Stefania, Abbracchio Mariapia P
Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009(193):535-87. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-89615-9_17.
Adenosine receptors modulate neuronal and synaptic function in a range of ways that may make them relevant to the occurrence, development and treatment of brain ischemic damage and degenerative disorders. A(1) adenosine receptors tend to suppress neural activity by a predominantly presynaptic action, while A(2A) adenosine receptors are more likely to promote transmitter release and postsynaptic depolarization. A variety of interactions have also been described in which adenosine A(1) or A(2) adenosine receptors can modify cellular responses to conventional neurotransmitters or receptor agonists such as glutamate, NMDA, nitric oxide and P2 purine receptors. Part of the role of adenosine receptors seems to be in the regulation of inflammatory processes that often occur in the aftermath of a major insult or disease process. All of the adenosine receptors can modulate the release of cytokines such as interleukins and tumor necrosis factor-alpha from immune-competent leukocytes and glia. When examined directly as modifiers of brain damage, A(1) adenosine receptor (AR) agonists, A(2A)AR agonists and antagonists, as well as A(3)AR antagonists, can protect against a range of insults, both in vitro and in vivo. Intriguingly, acute and chronic treatments with these ligands can often produce diametrically opposite effects on damage outcome, probably resulting from adaptational changes in receptor number or properties. In some cases molecular approaches have identified the involvement of ERK and GSK-3beta pathways in the protection from damage. Much evidence argues for a role of adenosine receptors in neurological disease. Receptor densities are altered in patients with Alzheimer's disease, while many studies have demonstrated effects of adenosine and its antagonists on synaptic plasticity in vitro, or on learning adequacy in vivo. The combined effects of adenosine on neuronal viability and inflammatory processes have also led to considerations of their roles in Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Huntington's disease and multiple sclerosis, as well as the brain damage associated with stroke. In addition to the potential pathological relevance of adenosine receptors, there are earnest attempts in progress to generate ligands that will target adenosine receptors as therapeutic agents to treat some of these disorders.
腺苷受体通过多种方式调节神经元和突触功能,这可能使它们与脑缺血损伤和退行性疾病的发生、发展及治疗相关。A(1)腺苷受体倾向于通过主要的突触前作用抑制神经活动,而A(2A)腺苷受体更有可能促进递质释放和突触后去极化。还描述了多种相互作用,其中腺苷A(1)或A(2)腺苷受体可改变细胞对传统神经递质或受体激动剂(如谷氨酸、NMDA、一氧化氮和P2嘌呤受体)的反应。腺苷受体的部分作用似乎在于调节通常在重大损伤或疾病过程之后发生的炎症过程。所有腺苷受体均可调节免疫活性白细胞和神经胶质细胞释放细胞因子,如白细胞介素和肿瘤坏死因子-α。当直接作为脑损伤的调节剂进行检测时,A(1)腺苷受体(AR)激动剂、A(2A)AR激动剂和拮抗剂以及A(3)AR拮抗剂在体外和体内均可抵御一系列损伤。有趣的是,用这些配体进行急性和慢性治疗通常会对损伤结果产生截然相反 的影响,这可能是由于受体数量或特性的适应性变化所致。在某些情况下,分子方法已确定ERK和GSK-3β信号通路参与了对损伤的保护作用。大量证据表明腺苷受体在神经疾病中发挥作用。阿尔茨海默病患者的受体密度会发生改变,而许多研究已证明腺苷及其拮抗剂在体外对突触可塑性或在体内对学习能力有影响。腺苷对神经元活力和炎症过程的综合作用也促使人们考虑它们在莱施-奈恩综合征、克雅氏病、亨廷顿舞蹈病和多发性硬化症以及与中风相关的脑损伤中的作用。除了腺苷受体潜在的病理相关性外,目前正在积极尝试研发能够靶向腺苷受体的配体作为治疗这些疾病的药物。