Suppr超能文献

U-CLIP(R) 腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡。

Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(R).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, piazza Donatori di sangue 3, 10154, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

World J Emerg Surg. 2009 Jul 29;4:28. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-4-28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The literature established that, in patients without Boey's risk factors, laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers, compared to open repair, is associated to lower wound infection rate, less analgesic use, reduction in post operative pain, shorter hospital stay. Some of the main drawbacks are length of operative time and laparoscopic surgeon's experience in intracorporeal knotting.We, for first, report our preliminary experience of perforated peptic ulcers' laparoscopic repair using Medtronic U-Clip(R).

METHODS

From January 2008 to June 2008 we performed laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers using Medtronic U-Clip(R) in 10 consecutive patients (6 men and 4 women, from 20 to 65 years-old of age). All the patients presented with iuxtapyloric perforated peptic ulcer, not greater than 10 mm, without signs of sepsis, free from major illnesses. The mini-invasive procedure was performed both by skilled and non-skilled laparoscopic surgeons under experts' surveillance. After it was recognized, perforation was sutured using U-Clip(R) in a full-thickness manner.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We reported no surgical complications in the peri-operative period. The clinical outcome and time needed to perform the intervention didn't change between skilled and non-skilled surgeons. The follow-up at 30 days was good.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, the anastomotic device U-Clip(R) simplifies laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer, avoiding the need to perform knots and making the procedure safe and easier.

摘要

背景

文献表明,在无 Boey 危险因素的患者中,与开腹修补相比,腹腔镜修补穿孔性消化性溃疡具有更低的伤口感染率、更少的止痛药物使用、术后疼痛减轻和住院时间缩短等优点。其主要缺点是手术时间较长,以及腹腔镜外科医生在体内打结方面的经验。我们首次报告了使用 Medtronic U-Clip(R)行穿孔性消化性溃疡腹腔镜修补的初步经验。

方法

从 2008 年 1 月至 2008 年 6 月,我们使用 Medtronic U-Clip(R)连续治疗了 10 例穿孔性消化性溃疡患者(6 名男性和 4 名女性,年龄 20-65 岁)。所有患者均为幽门旁穿孔性消化性溃疡,穿孔直径不超过 10mm,无脓毒症迹象,无重大疾病。在专家的监护下,由熟练和非熟练的腹腔镜外科医生进行微创治疗。穿孔识别后,使用 U-Clip(R)全层缝合。

结果和讨论

我们报告在围手术期没有手术并发症。熟练和非熟练外科医生之间的手术干预时间和临床结果没有变化。30 天的随访情况良好。

结论

在我们的经验中,吻合装置 U-Clip(R)简化了穿孔性消化性溃疡的腹腔镜修补,避免了打结的需要,使手术更加安全和简单。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcers with U-CLIP(R).
World J Emerg Surg. 2009 Jul 29;4:28. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-4-28.
2
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):313-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
4
Outcome of Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Peptic Ulcers in a Resource-Limited Setting.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 15;14(4):e24159. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24159. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y. Epub 2004 May 12.
6
Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation without omental patch versus conventional open repair.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Oct;17(5):615-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0195.
7
Comparison between open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer disease.
World J Surg. 2008 Nov;32(11):2371-4. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9707-5.
9
Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Ann Surg. 1995 Mar;221(3):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199503000-00004.
10
Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal "cross and twine" knotting.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jan;25(1):229-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1164-1. Epub 2010 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Surgery in Luminal Gastrointestinal Emergencies-a Review of Current Status.
Indian J Surg. 2014 Dec;76(6):436-43. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1081-y. Epub 2014 May 13.
2
U-clip for airway reconstruction: an experimental study of the feasibility of a robot-assisted endoscopic procedure.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Mar;26(3):764-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1949-x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic duodenal atresia repair using surgical U-clips: a novel technique.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):1023-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9211-2. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
2
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004778.pub2.
3
Systematic review comparing laparoscopic and open repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1195-207. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5155.
4
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y. Epub 2004 May 12.
5
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):320-1. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00002.
6
Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):313-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001.
7
Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: outcome and efficacy in 30 consecutive patients.
Arch Surg. 1999 Aug;134(8):845-8; discussion 849-50. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.134.8.845.
8
Laparoscopic omental patch repair for perforated peptic ulcer.
Ann Surg. 1995 Mar;221(3):236-40. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199503000-00004.
9
A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers.
Ann Surg. 1982 Mar;195(3):265-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198203000-00004.
10
Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer.
Br J Surg. 1990 Sep;77(9):1006. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验