Research Centre, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal (QC), Canada.
BMC Geriatr. 2009 Jul 29;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-9-34.
The number of elderly people requiring hospital care is growing, so, quality and assessment of care for elders are emerging and complex areas of research. Very few validated and reliable instruments exist for the assessment of quality of acute care in this field. This study's objective was to create such a tool for Geriatric Evaluation and Management Units (GEMUs).
The methodology involved a reliability and feasibility study of a retrospective chart review on 934 older inpatients admitted in 49 GEMUs during the year 2002-2003 for fall-related trauma as a tracer condition. Pertinent indicators for a chart abstraction tool, the Geriatric Care Tool (GCT), were developed and validated according to five dimensions: access to care, comprehensiveness, continuity of care, patient-centred care and appropriateness. Consensus methods were used to develop the content. Participants were experts representing eight main health care professions involved in GEMUs from 19 different sites. Items associated with high quality of care at each step of the multidisciplinary management of patients admitted due to falls were identified. The GCT was tested for intra- and inter-rater reliability using 30 medical charts reviewed by each of three independent and blinded trained nurses. Kappa and agreement measures between pairs of chart reviewers were computed on an item-by-item basis.
Three quarters of 169 items identifying the process of care, from the case history to discharge planning, demonstrated good agreement (kappa greater than 0.40 and agreement over 70%). Indicators for the appropriateness of care showed less reliability.
Content validity and reliability results, as well as the feasibility of the process, suggest that the chart abstraction tool can gather standardized and pertinent clinical information for further evaluating quality of care in GEMU using admission due to falls as a tracer condition. However, the GCT should be evaluated in other models of acute geriatric units and new strategies should be developed to improve reliability of peer assessments in characterizing the quality of care for elderly patients with complex conditions.
需要住院治疗的老年人数量不断增加,因此,老年人的护理质量和评估成为一个新兴且复杂的研究领域。在该领域,针对急性护理质量评估,目前仅有极少数经过验证且可靠的工具。本研究旨在为老年评估和管理病房(GEMU)创建这样一种工具。
该方法涉及对 2002 年至 2003 年期间因跌倒相关创伤入住 49 个 GEMU 的 934 名老年住院患者的回顾性病历审查的可靠性和可行性研究。根据五个维度:获得医疗服务、全面性、护理连续性、以患者为中心的护理和适当性,制定并验证了老年护理工具(GCT)的相关指标。采用共识方法制定内容。参与者为来自 19 个不同地点的 8 个主要医疗保健专业的专家,他们代表 GEMU 中的专业人员。确定了在因跌倒而住院的患者多学科管理的每个步骤中与高质量护理相关的项目。使用 30 份病历对 3 名独立且盲法训练有素的护士进行了内部和内部审核员之间的可靠性测试。根据逐项评估,计算了每个审核员之间的 Kappa 和一致性度量。
169 项识别护理过程的项目中,有四分之三(kappa 值大于 0.40,一致性超过 70%)显示出良好的一致性。护理适宜性指标的可靠性较低。
内容有效性和可靠性结果以及该过程的可行性表明,该病历摘录工具可以收集标准化和相关的临床信息,以便进一步评估 GEMU 中因跌倒入院的老年患者的护理质量。但是,GCT 应在其他急性老年病房模型中进行评估,并应制定新策略来提高对老年患者复杂病情护理质量的同行评估的可靠性。