• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恢复用于环境市场的生态系统服务。

Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets.

作者信息

Palmer Margaret A, Filoso Solange

机构信息

Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD 20688, USA.

出版信息

Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):575-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1172976.

DOI:10.1126/science.1172976
PMID:19644112
Abstract

Ecological restoration is an activity that ideally results in the return of an ecosystem to an undisturbed state. Ecosystem services are the benefits humans derive from ecosystems. The two have been joined to support growing environmental markets with the goal of creating restoration-based credits that can be bought and sold. However, the allure of these markets may be overshadowing shortcomings in the science and practice of ecological restoration. Before making risky investments, we must understand why and when restoration efforts fall short of recovering the full suite of ecosystem services, what can be done to improve restoration success, and why direct measurement of the biophysical processes that support ecosystem services is the only way to guarantee the future success of these markets. Without new science and an oversight framework to protect the ecosystem service assets which people depend, markets could actually accelerate environmental degradation.

摘要

生态恢复是一项理想情况下能使生态系统恢复到未受干扰状态的活动。生态系统服务是人类从生态系统中获得的益处。这两者已结合起来,以支持不断发展的环境市场,目标是创造基于恢复的信用额度,可进行买卖。然而,这些市场的吸引力可能掩盖了生态恢复科学与实践中的不足。在进行风险投资之前,我们必须明白为什么以及何时恢复努力未能完全恢复整套生态系统服务,如何才能提高恢复成功率,以及为什么直接测量支持生态系统服务的生物物理过程是确保这些市场未来成功的唯一途径。如果没有新的科学以及保护人们所依赖的生态系统服务资产的监督框架,市场实际上可能会加速环境退化。

相似文献

1
Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets.恢复用于环境市场的生态系统服务。
Science. 2009 Jul 31;325(5940):575-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1172976.
2
Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis.生态恢复对生物多样性和生态系统服务的增强作用:一项荟萃分析。
Science. 2009 Aug 28;325(5944):1121-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1172460. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
3
Risk and markets for ecosystem services.生态系统服务的风险和市场。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Dec 15;45(24):10322-30. doi: 10.1021/es203201n. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
4
Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns.从生态风险和回报的角度评估生态系统服务。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Apr;25(2):250-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01623.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
5
Restoration enhances wetland biodiversity and ecosystem service supply, but results are context-dependent: a meta-analysis.湿地恢复可增强生物多样性并提供生态系统服务,但结果因具体情况而异:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 17;9(4):e93507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093507. eCollection 2014.
6
Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities.恢复生态系统服务和生物多样性:冲突与机遇。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2011 Oct;26(10):541-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
7
Coordinating ecological restoration options analysis and risk assessment to improve environmental outcomes.协调生态恢复方案分析与风险评估以改善环境成果。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Apr;12(2):253-63. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1673. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
8
Fighting carbon loss of degraded peatlands by jump-starting ecosystem functioning with ecological restoration.通过生态恢复来启动生态系统功能,防止退化泥炭地的碳损失。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 15;537:268-76. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.094. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
9
Financing ecosystem restoration.资助生态系统修复。
Curr Biol. 2024 May 6;34(9):R412-R417. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.02.031.
10
Selecting cost-effective areas for restoration of ecosystem services.选择具有成本效益的生态系统服务恢复区域。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):493-502. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12391. Epub 2014 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of surface coal mining on carbon storage in semi-arid steppe.露天煤矿开采对半干旱草原碳储存的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 8;15(1):15981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01148-2.
2
The Gut Microbiome of Two Wild Bumble Bee Species Native of South America: Bombus pauloensis and Bombus bellicosus.两种原产于南美的野生熊蜂的肠道微生物组:保罗熊蜂和好战熊蜂。
Microb Ecol. 2024 Sep 28;87(1):121. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02430-y.
3
Phosphorus Inventory for the Conterminous United States (2002-2012).美国本土(2002 - 2012年)的磷储量
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2021 Mar;126(4):1-21. doi: 10.1029/2020jg005684.
4
Seed encrusting with salicylic acid: A novel approach to improve establishment of grass species in ecological restoration.种子包衣水杨酸:一种提高生态恢复中草种建植的新方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0242035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242035. eCollection 2021.
5
A biome-wide experiment to assess the effects of propagule size and treatment on the survival of Portulacaria afra (spekboom) truncheons planted to restore degraded subtropical thicket of South Africa.一项在生物群区范围内进行的实验,旨在评估繁殖体大小和处理方法对种植 Portulacaria afra(南非冰叶日中花)原木以恢复南非亚热带灌木丛退化区的成活率的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250256. eCollection 2021.
6
Challenges during the execution, results, and monitoring phases of ecological restoration: Learning from a country-wide assessment.生态恢复执行、结果和监测阶段的挑战:从全国评估中学习。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 6;16(4):e0249573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249573. eCollection 2021.
7
Does Riparian Fencing Protect Stream Water Quality in Cattle-Grazed Lands?河岸围栏能否保护放牧地区的溪流水质?
Environ Manage. 2020 Jul;66(1):121-135. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01297-2. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Integrating ecosystem services considerations within a GIS-based habitat suitability index for oyster restoration.在基于 GIS 的牡蛎栖息地适宜性指数中纳入生态系统服务考虑因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210936. eCollection 2019.
9
Ecological restoration should be redefined for the twenty-first century.生态修复应在21世纪重新定义。
Restor Ecol. 2017 Sep 24;25(5):668-673. doi: 10.1111/rec.12554.
10
An Assessment of Long-Term Compliance with Performance Standards in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands.对补偿性缓解湿地绩效标准长期合规情况的评估
Environ Manage. 2017 Apr;59(4):546-556. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0804-1. Epub 2016 Dec 16.