Sicras-Mainar Antoni, Blanca-Tamayo Milagrosa, Gutiérrez-Nicuesa Laura, Salvatella-Pasant Jordi, Navarro-Artieda Ruth
Dirección de Planificación, Badalona Serveis Assistencials S.A., Badalona, Barcelona, España.
Gac Sanit. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):13-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 30.
To determinate the impact of comorbidity, resource use and cost (healthcare and lost productivity) on maintenance of remission of major depressive disorder in a Spanish population setting.
We performed an observational, prospective, multicenter study using population databases. The inclusion criteria were age > or = 18 years, first depressive episode between January 2003 and March 2007, with antidepressant prescription >60 days after the first prescription and a follow-up of at least 18 months (study: 12 months; continuation: 6 months). Two subgroups were considered: patients with/without remission.
sociodemographic data, episodes, resource utilization bands, healthcare costs (direct) and lost productivity (indirect). Logistic regression and analysis of covariance (Bonferroni correction) were used for analysis.
A total of 4,572 patients were analyzed and 54.6% (95% confidence interval: 53.2-56.0%) were considered in remission. Patients in remission were younger (52.6 vs. 60.7), with a lower proportion of women (71.7% vs. 78.2%), and showed less general morbidity (6.2 vs. 7.7 episodes/year), lower resource utilization bands/year (2.7 vs. 3.0), fewer sick leave days (31.0 vs. 38.5) and shorter treatment duration (146.6 vs. 307.7 days); p<0.01. Lack of remission was associated with fibromyalgia (odds ratio [OR]=2.5), thyroid alterations (OR=1.3) and hypertension (OR=1.2); p<0.001. The annual healthcare cost was euro706.0 per patient in remission vs. euro1,108.3 without remission (p <0.001) and lost productivity was euro1,631.5 vs. euro2,024.2, respectively (p <0.001).
Patients not achieving remission showed higher morbidity, resources use, healthcare costs and, especially, productivity losses.
确定在西班牙人群中,合并症、资源利用及成本(医疗保健和生产力损失)对重度抑郁症缓解维持的影响。
我们利用人口数据库进行了一项观察性、前瞻性、多中心研究。纳入标准为年龄≥18岁,2003年1月至2007年3月期间首次抑郁发作,首次处方后抗抑郁药处方超过60天且随访至少18个月(研究期:12个月;延续期:6个月)。考虑两个亚组:缓解/未缓解患者。
社会人口统计学数据、发作情况、资源利用类别、医疗保健成本(直接)和生产力损失(间接)。采用逻辑回归和协方差分析(Bonferroni校正)进行分析。
共分析了4572例患者,54.6%(95%置信区间:53.2 - 56.0%)被认为处于缓解状态。缓解患者更年轻(52.6岁对60.7岁),女性比例更低(71.7%对78.2%),且总体发病率更低(每年6.2次对7.7次发作),每年资源利用类别更少(2.7对3.0),病假天数更少(31.0天对38.5天),治疗持续时间更短(146.6天对307.7天);p<0.01。未缓解与纤维肌痛(优势比[OR]=2.5)、甲状腺改变(OR=1.3)和高血压(OR=1.2)相关;p<0.001。缓解患者的年度医疗保健成本为每位患者706.0欧元,未缓解患者为1108.3欧元(p<0.001),生产力损失分别为1631.5欧元和2024.2欧元(p<0.001)。
未实现缓解的患者发病率更高、资源利用更多、医疗保健成本更高,尤其是生产力损失更大。