Warwick Centre for Global Health, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Department of Economics & Center for Economic Behaviour and Inequality, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0306740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306740. eCollection 2024.
Understanding the susceptibility and infectiousness of children and adolescents in comparison to adults is important to appreciate their role in the COVID-19 pandemic.
To determine SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility and infectiousness of children and adolescents with adults as comparator for three variants (wild-type, alpha, delta) in the household setting. We aimed to identify the effects independent of vaccination or prior infection.
We searched EMBASE, PubMed and medRxiv up to January 2022.
Two reviewers independently identified studies providing secondary household attack rates (SAR) for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children (0-9 years), adolescents (10-19 years) or both compared with adults (20 years and older).
Two reviewers independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias and performed a random-effects meta-analysis model.
Odds ratio (OR) for SARS-CoV-2 infection comparing children and adolescents with adults stratified by wild-type (ancestral type), alpha, and delta variant, respectively. Susceptibility was defined as the secondary attack rate (SAR) among susceptible household contacts irrespective of the age of the index case. Infectiousness was defined as the SAR irrespective of the age of household contacts when children/adolescents/adults were the index case.
Susceptibility analysis: We included 27 studies (308,681 contacts), for delta only one (large) study was available. Compared to adults, children and adolescents were less susceptible to the wild-type and delta, but equally susceptible to alpha. Infectiousness analysis: We included 21 studies (201,199 index cases). Compared to adults, children and adolescents were less infectious when infected with the wild-type and delta. Alpha -related infectiousness remained unclear, 0-9 year old children were at least as infectious as adults. Overall SAR among household contacts varied between the variants.
When considering the potential role of children and adolescents, variant-specific susceptibility, infectiousness, age group and overall transmissibility need to be assessed.
了解儿童和青少年与成年人相比的易感性和传染性,对于理解他们在 COVID-19 大流行中的作用非常重要。
在家庭环境中,比较三种变体(野生型、阿尔法、德尔塔),确定儿童和青少年感染 SARS-CoV-2 的易感性和传染性。我们旨在确定独立于疫苗接种或既往感染的影响。
我们在 EMBASE、PubMed 和 medRxiv 上进行了搜索,截止日期为 2022 年 1 月。
两位审稿人独立筛选了提供 SARS-CoV-2 感染儿童(0-9 岁)、青少年(10-19 岁)或两者与成年人(20 岁及以上)相比的二次家庭发病率(SAR)的研究。
两位审稿人独立提取数据,评估偏倚风险,并进行随机效应荟萃分析模型。
分别比较野生型(原型)、阿尔法和德尔塔变体,儿童和青少年与成年人相比,SARS-CoV-2 感染的优势比(OR)。易感性定义为易感家庭接触者中的二次攻击率(SAR),无论索引病例的年龄如何。传染性定义为当儿童/青少年/成年人是索引病例时,无论家庭接触者的年龄如何,SAR。
易感性分析:我们纳入了 27 项研究(308681 名接触者),仅对德尔塔变体进行了一项(大型)研究。与成年人相比,儿童和青少年对野生型和德尔塔变体的易感性较低,但对阿尔法变体的易感性相同。传染性分析:我们纳入了 21 项研究(201199 名索引病例)。与成年人相比,当感染野生型和德尔塔变体时,儿童和青少年的传染性较低。阿尔法相关的传染性仍不清楚,0-9 岁儿童的传染性至少与成年人一样高。家庭接触者中的总体 SAR 因变体而异。
在考虑儿童和青少年的潜在作用时,需要评估变体特异性易感性、传染性、年龄组和总体传播性。