• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耶鲁胰岛素输注方案的计算机化及静脉用胰岛素致低血糖原因的潜在见解。

Computerization of the Yale insulin infusion protocol and potential insights into causes of hypoglycemia with intravenous insulin.

机构信息

Hiram C. Polk Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar;15(3):246-52. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0277. Epub 2013 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2012.0277
PMID:23289409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3696925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The management of critically ill hyperglycemic patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) has been fraught with recent controversy. Only one randomized trial has demonstrated a mortality benefit to intensive glycemic control, with all subsequent studies failing to confirm this benefit and revealing a markedly increased risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH) in intensively treated patients. In most of these trials, adherence to the protocols were neither tracked nor reported.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to an ICU who were treated with an insulin infusion directed by the GlucoCare™ IGC System, an FDA-cleared insulin-dosing calculator (Yale 100-140 mg/dL protocol). Mean blood glucose (BG) levels, time to target range and incidence of SH (<40 mg/dL) and moderate hypoglycemia (MH) (40-69 mg/dL) were determined, and potential causes of hypoglycemic episodes were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean post-target BG was approximately 123 mg/dL. Of >55,000 readings in 1,657 patients, overall incidence of SH was 0.01% of readings and 0.3% of patients. MH occurred in 1.1% of readings and 17.6% of patients. The top potential causes of MH were: (1) Protocol-directed recommendations including continuation of insulin with BG <100 mg/dL and decreases in the frequency of BG checks (63.7%), and (2) Staff non-adherence to protocol directives (15.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the GlucoCare-directed Yale 100-140 mg/dL protocol experience revealed an extremely low incidence of SH and an incidence of MH of 1.1%. The incidence of SH in this study was lower than the control group of the NICE-SUGAR study and are supportive of the new Society of Critical Care guidelines to target BG levels of 100-150 mg/dL in critically ill patients. Further refinements to the original protocol and emphasis on staff adherence to protocol directives could potentially further reduce these very low hypoglycemia rates.

摘要

背景

在重症监护病房(ICU)中,对危重病高血糖患者的管理一直存在争议。只有一项随机试验表明强化血糖控制可降低死亡率,但随后的所有研究均未能证实这一益处,并且在强化治疗的患者中明显增加了严重低血糖(SH)的风险。在这些试验中,大多数都没有跟踪或报告对方案的遵守情况。

方法

对使用 GlucoCare™IGC 系统(FDA 批准的胰岛素剂量计算器[耶鲁 100-140mg/dL 方案])进行胰岛素输注治疗的 ICU 住院患者进行回顾性分析。测定平均血糖(BG)水平、达到目标范围的时间以及 SH(<40mg/dL)和中度低血糖(MH)(40-69mg/dL)的发生率,并评估低血糖发作的潜在原因。

结果

目标后平均 BG 约为 123mg/dL。在 1657 名患者的 55000 多次读数中,SH 的总发生率为读数的 0.01%,患者的 0.3%。MH 发生率为读数的 1.1%,患者的 17.6%。MH 的潜在主要原因包括:(1)方案指导建议,包括在 BG<100mg/dL 时继续使用胰岛素和减少 BG 检查频率(63.7%),以及(2)工作人员不遵守方案指令(15.3%)。

结论

GlucoCare 指导的耶鲁 100-140mg/dL 方案的结果显示,SH 的发生率极低,MH 的发生率为 1.1%。本研究中的 SH 发生率低于 NICE-SUGAR 研究的对照组,支持新的重症监护协会指南将危重患者的 BG 水平目标设定为 100-150mg/dL。对原始方案的进一步改进和强调工作人员对方案指令的遵守,可能会进一步降低这些非常低的低血糖发生率。

相似文献

1
Computerization of the Yale insulin infusion protocol and potential insights into causes of hypoglycemia with intravenous insulin.耶鲁胰岛素输注方案的计算机化及静脉用胰岛素致低血糖原因的潜在见解。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Mar;15(3):246-52. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0277. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
2
Minimization of Hypoglycemia as an Adverse Event During Insulin Infusion: Further Refinement of the Yale Protocol.胰岛素输注期间将低血糖作为不良事件进行最小化处理:耶鲁方案的进一步完善
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Aug;18(8):480-6. doi: 10.1089/dia.2016.0101. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.在一家大型学术医疗中心,针对重症患者,纸质方案指导的胰岛素输注与电子血糖管理系统指导的胰岛素输注过程中发生低血糖的风险。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;12(1):47-52. doi: 10.1177/1932296817747617. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
4
Target attainment through algorithm design during intravenous insulin infusion.静脉输注胰岛素期间通过算法设计实现目标达成。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Apr;16(4):208-18. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0287. Epub 2013 Dec 19.
5
Performance of a dose-defining insulin infusion protocol among trauma service intensive care unit admissions.创伤服务重症监护病房入院患者中剂量确定胰岛素输注方案的实施情况。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006 Aug;8(4):476-88. doi: 10.1089/dia.2006.8.476.
6
USE OF A COMPUTER-GUIDED GLUCOSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO IMPROVE GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND ADDRESS NATIONAL QUALITY MEASURES: A 7-YEAR, RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY AT A TERTIARY CARE TEACHING HOSPITAL.使用计算机引导的血糖管理系统改善血糖控制并满足国家质量指标:在一家三级护理教学医院进行的为期7年的回顾性观察研究。
Endocr Pract. 2017 Mar;23(3):331-341. doi: 10.4158/EP161402.OR. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
7
Comparison of insulin infusion protocols targeting 110-140 mg/dL in patients after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后目标血糖值为 110-140mg/dL 的胰岛素输注方案比较。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012 Nov;14(11):1013-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0114. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
8
Evaluation of nursing adherence to a paper-based graduated continuous intravenous regular human insulin infusion algorithm.评估纸质版连续性静脉输注常规人胰岛素输注算法的护理依从性。
Nutrition. 2012 Oct;28(10):1008-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 May 31.
9
Closed-loop artificial pancreas using subcutaneous glucose sensing and insulin delivery and a model predictive control algorithm: the Virginia experience.采用皮下葡萄糖传感与胰岛素输注以及模型预测控制算法的闭环人工胰腺:弗吉尼亚州的经验。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):1031-8. doi: 10.1177/193229680900300506.
10
Reducing the risk of hypoglycemia associated with intravenous insulin: experience with a computerized insulin infusion program in 4 adult intensive care units.降低与静脉注射胰岛素相关的低血糖风险:4个成人重症监护病房使用计算机化胰岛素输注程序的经验
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Sep;8(5):923-9. doi: 10.1177/1932296814540870. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the management of hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus during hospitalization.住院期间高血糖症和糖尿病管理的进展
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1038/s41574-025-01157-1.
2
Nursing Perspectives on the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit.护理视角下重症监护病房中连续血糖监测的应用。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):649-655. doi: 10.1177/19322968231170616. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
3
A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Two Computerized Insulin Infusion Protocols.两种计算机胰岛素输注方案的回顾性队列分析。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 May;17(3):635-641. doi: 10.1177/19322968231163584. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
Optimal Blood Glucose Monitoring Interval for Insulin Infusion in Critically Ill Non-Cardiothoracic Patients: A Pilot Study.危重症非心胸外科患者胰岛素输注时的最佳血糖监测间隔:一项初步研究。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Feb 25;92(1):e2021036. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.9083.
5
Monitoring the Impact of Aggressive Glycemic Intervention during Critical Care after Cardiac Surgery with a Glycemic Expert System for Nurse-Implemented Euglycemia: The MAGIC GENIE Project.监测心脏手术后重症监护期间强化血糖干预的影响:使用血糖专家系统实现护士实施的血糖正常化的 MAGIC GENIE 项目。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):251-264. doi: 10.1177/1932296821995568.
6
Improving Hospital Glucometrics, Workflow, and Outcomes with a Computerized Intravenous Insulin Dose Calculator Built into the Electronic Health Record.利用嵌入电子病历的计算机化静脉胰岛素剂量计算器改善医院血糖指标、工作流程和结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):271-278. doi: 10.1177/1932296820974767. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
7
Stress burden related to postreperfusion syndrome may aggravate hyperglycemia with insulin resistance during living donor liver transplantation: A propensity score-matching analysis.再灌注后综合征相关的应激负担可能会加重活体肝移植期间的胰岛素抵抗性高血糖:倾向评分匹配分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0243873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243873. eCollection 2020.
8
Insulin Infusion Computer Calculator Programmed Directly Into Electronic Health Record Medication Administration Record.胰岛素输注计算机计算器直接编程到电子健康记录药物管理记录中。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 Mar;15(2):214-221. doi: 10.1177/1932296820966616. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
9
Letter: An Electronic Health Record-Integrated Computerized Intravenous Insulin Infusion Protocol: Clinical Outcomes and Adjustment ( 2020;44:56-66).信函:一种电子健康记录集成的计算机化静脉胰岛素输注方案:临床结果与调整(2020年;44卷:56 - 66页)
Diabetes Metab J. 2020 Apr;44(2):354-355. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2020.0071.
10
An Electronic Health Record-Integrated Computerized Intravenous Insulin Infusion Protocol: Clinical Outcomes and Adjustment.电子病历整合的计算机静脉胰岛素输注方案:临床结局与调整。
Diabetes Metab J. 2020 Feb;44(1):56-66. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0227. Epub 2019 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for the use of an insulin infusion for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients.危重症患者血糖管理中应用胰岛素输注的指南。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Dec;40(12):3251-76. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182653269.
2
Hypoglycemia and risk of death in critically ill patients.危重症患者低血糖与死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 20;367(12):1108-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1204942.
3
A comparison study of continuous insulin infusion protocols in the medical intensive care unit: computer-guided vs. standard column-based algorithms.在医疗重症监护病房中连续胰岛素输注方案的比较研究:计算机引导与标准列基算法。
J Hosp Med. 2010 Oct;5(8):432-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.816.
4
Use of a computerized intravenous insulin algorithm within a nurse-directed protocol for patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.在护士主导的方案中,为接受心血管手术的患者使用计算机化静脉胰岛素算法。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008 May;2(3):369-75. doi: 10.1177/193229680800200305.
5
Evaluation of compliance with a paper-based, multiplication-factor, intravenous insulin protocol.基于纸质乘法因子静脉胰岛素方案的依从性评估。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Sep;43(9):1413-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M060. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
6
Tight glycemic control and computerized decision-support systems: a systematic review.严格血糖控制与计算机化决策支持系统:一项系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep;35(9):1505-17. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1542-0. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
7
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control.美国临床内分泌医师协会与美国糖尿病协会关于住院患者血糖控制的共识声明。
Endocr Pract. 2009 May-Jun;15(4):353-69. doi: 10.4158/EP09102.RA.
8
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association consensus statement on inpatient glycemic control.美国临床内分泌医师协会与美国糖尿病协会关于住院患者血糖控制的共识声明。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jun;32(6):1119-31. doi: 10.2337/dc09-9029. Epub 2009 May 8.
9
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.危重症患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
10
Comparison of three protocols for tight glycemic control in cardiac surgery patients.心脏手术患者严格血糖控制三种方案的比较
Diabetes Care. 2009 May;32(5):757-61. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1851. Epub 2009 Feb 5.