Limits of detection of bluetongue virus with different assay systems.

The sensitivity of different assay systems for detecting low concentrations of bluetongue virus (BTV) were compared. These assays included blind passage on baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells and on cattle pulmonary artery endothelial (CPAE) cells, immunoperoxidase staining of cells on multiwell slides, and cDNA/RNA hybridization of BTV infected cells. Nine serial 10-fold dilutions of a cell culture-adapted BTV serotype 11 were tested (each dilution was treated as a separate sample) in all assays. Visual inspection for cytopathic effects (CPE) during 3 passages in BHK-21 cells detected samples that contained greater than or equal to 3 plaque forming units (PFU)/ml of BTV. Evidence of CPE during 3 passages in CPAE cells detected samples that contained greater than or equal to 0.3 PFU/ml of BTV. A limit of detection (greater than or equal to 0.3 PFU/ml) was obtained faster by immunoperoxidase staining of BTV-inoculated CPAE cells on multiwell slides and incubated for 3 days. The cDNA/RNA hybridizations of CPAE and BHK-21 cells incubated for 2 or 3 days, respectively, with BTV dilution samples detected samples that contained greater than or equal to 30 PFU/ml. Of the assay systems examined, immunoperoxidase staining of CPAE cells on multiwell slides inoculated with cell culture-adapted BTV was the most sensitive and fastest assay for definitive virus identification.