SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2010 Mar;121(3):204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.021. Epub 2009 Aug 4.
There continues to be a debate about the long-term prognosis of psychiatric treatment of depression in later life. There have been no long-term naturalistic studies of psychiatric outpatient treatment of older adults in the United States. This study examines outcome and predictors of various levels of depression among a biracial sample of geropsychiatric outpatients in Brooklyn, NY.
We conducted a naturalistic study (median: 33 months) of 143 persons aged 55 and over with diagnoses of depression drawn from 15 psychiatry outpatient clinics and 2 geriatric day programs. Their mean age was 68 years, 87% were female, and 43% were white and 57% were black, among whom 37% were African Caribbeans. Using George's Social Antecedent Model of Depression, we examined the impact of 15 predictor variables on two outcome measures: presence of any either subclinical or clinical depression (CES-D score > or = 8) and presence of clinical depression (CES-D score > or = 16).
On follow-up, 84% and 90% of subclinically and clinically depressed persons at baseline, respectively, were depressed (CES-D > or = 8); 62% of those in remission at baseline were depressed. In logistic regression, 3 variables were significant predictors of any level of depression on follow-up: baseline depression, baseline anxiety, greater increase in anxiety symptoms during the follow-up period. These 3 variables along with financial strain were significant predictors of clinical depression on follow-up. There were no inter- or intra-racial differences in outcome.
The bleak outcome findings among older psychiatric outpatients in Brooklyn were consistent with unfavorable results reported in European studies. Because there were only a few predictors of outcome, strategies that target high risk persons - e.g., such as those with subclinical depression, anxiety, or in more economic distress - may prevent transition to severe and persistent depressive states.
关于晚年精神科治疗抑郁症的长期预后仍存在争议。在美国,尚无关于老年精神科门诊患者精神科治疗的长期自然主义研究。本研究检查了纽约布鲁克林的 15 个精神病门诊和 2 个老年日间计划中接受生物种族精神科门诊治疗的老年人样本中各种程度的抑郁的结果和预测因素。
我们对 143 名年龄在 55 岁及以上的患有抑郁症诊断的患者进行了自然主义研究(中位数:33 个月),这些患者来自 15 个精神病门诊诊所和 2 个老年日间计划。他们的平均年龄为 68 岁,87%为女性,43%为白种人,57%为黑种人,其中 37%为非洲加勒比人。使用乔治的抑郁症社会前因模型,我们检查了 15 个预测变量对两个结果衡量标准的影响:存在任何亚临床或临床抑郁症(CES-D 评分≥8)和存在临床抑郁症(CES-D 评分≥16)。
在随访时,分别有 84%和 90%的基线时有亚临床和临床抑郁症的患者(CES-D≥8)仍处于抑郁状态;基线时缓解的患者中有 62%仍处于抑郁状态。在逻辑回归中,3 个变量是随访时任何程度抑郁的重要预测因素:基线抑郁、基线焦虑、随访期间焦虑症状的更大增加。这 3 个变量加上经济压力是随访时临床抑郁症的重要预测因素。种族间或种族内没有结果差异。
布鲁克林老年精神病门诊患者的惨淡结果与欧洲研究报告的不利结果一致。由于只有少数预后预测因素,因此针对高风险人群的策略(例如,针对有亚临床抑郁症、焦虑症或经济压力更大的人群)可能会防止向严重和持续的抑郁状态转变。