Silveira E R, Ebrahim S
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free Medical School, London, UK.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;13(11):801-12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(1998110)13:11<801::aid-gps876>3.0.co;2-z.
The social conditions under which migrants to the UK live may be more significant than the experience of migration itself in leading to increased risk of mental illness. We aimed to compare the prevalence of mental, physical and social health problems in elderly Somalis, Bengalis and whites living in a deprived inner London area and examine associations between environmental circumstances, social support, physical health status, mood and life satisfaction in these groups. In addition, we wanted to test the hypothesis that differences in mental health between immigrants and whites are explained by social disadvantages rather than ethnicity.
Cross-sectional survey with participants drawn from age-sex registers of general practices, augmented by other sources.
East London--'first-generation' Somali and Bengali immigrants and white British.
A total of 274 people aged 60+ years: 72 Somalis, 75 Bengalis and 127 whites.
Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Scale (SAD), Life Satisfaction Index (LSI). High SAD scores indicate more anxiety and depression symptoms; high LSI scores indicate greater life satisfaction.
Highest SAD scores were found among Bengalis; lowest LSI scores were found among Bengalis and Somalis. The prevalences of depression (SAD score 6+) were 25% in Somalis, 77% in Bengalis and 25% in east London whites. Physical health status and SAD scores were associated in Somalis (r = +0.31, p < or = 0.01). Bengalis (r = +0.47, p < or = 0.001) and east London whites (r = +0.27, p < or = 0.01). Physical health problems also related to lower LSI scores in Somalis (r = -0.24, p < or = 0.05) and east London whites (r = -0.24, p < or = 0.01). Social factors (i.e. poor housing conditions, low family support and reported need of community services) were strongly associated with SAD scores among Somalis (r = +0.5, p < or = 0.001) and, to a lesser extent, among Bengalis (r = +0.33, p < or = 0.01). Ethnicity (i.e. being an immigrant as opposed to a non-immigrant) became a statistically non-significant risk factor for high SAD scores after adjusting for the effects of age, weekly income, physical health and social problems (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.5-1.1, p = 0.09). A residual, but much attenuated effect for ethnicity on LSI scores persisted in the estimated model after controlling for the same set of independent risk factors (OR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.4-1, p = 0.05).
The marked variation in mental health between ethnic groups in east London might be a reflection of socioeconomic and health differentials acting concomitantly and adversely. Inequalities in housing, social support, income and physical health status accounted for variation in mood observed between immigrants and whites, and may partly explain differences in life satisfaction. These results seem to support a 'multiple jeopardy' theory of ageing in ethnic minorities in east London. Greater efforts are needed to recognize anxiety and depression in immigrant elders. Better social support and housing among 'minority ethnic' elders who live alone might be expected to alleviate social stress and improve mental health and psychological well-being.
移民到英国后所处的社会环境,可能比移民经历本身更能显著增加患精神疾病的风险。我们旨在比较居住在伦敦市中心贫困地区的索马里、孟加拉和白人老年人的心理、身体和社会健康问题的患病率,并研究这些群体中环境状况、社会支持、身体健康状况、情绪和生活满意度之间的关联。此外,我们想检验这样一个假设,即移民与白人之间心理健康的差异是由社会劣势而非种族造成的。
横断面调查,参与者从全科医疗的年龄 - 性别登记册中抽取,并辅以其他来源。
东伦敦——“第一代”索马里和孟加拉移民以及英国白人。
总共274名60岁及以上的人:72名索马里人、75名孟加拉人以及127名白人。
焦虑和抑郁症状量表(SAD)、生活满意度指数(LSI)。SAD得分高表明焦虑和抑郁症状更多;LSI得分高表明生活满意度更高。
孟加拉人的SAD得分最高;孟加拉人和索马里人的LSI得分最低。索马里人、孟加拉人和东伦敦白人中抑郁(SAD得分≥6)的患病率分别为25%、77%和25%。索马里人(r = +0.31,p≤0.01)、孟加拉人(r = +0.47,p≤0.001)和东伦敦白人(r = +0.27,p≤0.01)的身体健康状况与SAD得分相关。身体健康问题在索马里人(r = -0.24,p≤0.05)和东伦敦白人(r = -0.24,p≤0.01)中也与较低的LSI得分相关。社会因素(即住房条件差、家庭支持少以及报告需要社区服务)与索马里人(r = +0.5,p≤0.001)的SAD得分密切相关,在孟加拉人中相关性稍弱(r = +0.33,p≤0.01)。在调整年龄、周收入、身体健康和社会问题的影响后,种族(即作为移民与非移民相比)对于高SAD得分而言,在统计学上不再是一个显著的风险因素(OR = 0.71,95%CI = 0.5 - 1.1,p = 0.09)。在控制了同一组独立风险因素后,估计模型中种族对LSI得分仍存在残余但大幅减弱的影响(OR = 0.7,95%CI = 0.4 - 1,p = 0.05)。
东伦敦不同种族之间心理健康的显著差异,可能反映了社会经济和健康差异同时产生的不利影响。住房、社会支持、收入和身体健康状况的不平等,解释了移民与白人之间观察到的情绪差异,并且可能部分解释了生活满意度的差异。这些结果似乎支持了东伦敦少数族裔衰老的“多重风险”理论。需要做出更大努力来识别移民老年人中的焦虑和抑郁。对于独居的“少数族裔”老年人,更好的社会支持和住房有望减轻社会压力,改善心理健康和幸福感。