Suppr超能文献

通过由一条带子和一名检查者固定的手持测力计获得的膝关节和髋关节力量测量结果显示出平行可靠性,但不一致。

Knee and hip strength measurements obtained by a hand-held dynamometer stabilized by a belt and an examiner demonstrate parallel reliability but not agreement.

作者信息

Florencio Lidiane L, Martins Jaqueline, da Silva Marcelo R B, da Silva Janaina R, Bellizzi Gustavo L, Bevilaqua-Grossi Débora

机构信息

Physiotherapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madri, Spain.

Department of Health Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Phys Ther Sport. 2019 Jul;38:115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To verify the intrasession reliability and the agreement between strength measurement of hip and knee muscles using hand-held dynamometer stabilized by a belt or by an examiner.

DESIGN

Test-retest design.

SETTING

Knee and hip muscles strength were measured bilaterally using hand-held dynamometer stabilized by a belt and by an examiner.

PARTICIPANTS

24 young and healthy participants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The reliability was verified by the intraclass correlation coefficient and the standard error of measurement. Agreement between stabilization methods was verified by the Bland Altman's method.

RESULTS

Reliability was excellent for all muscle groups when stabilized by a belt (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78 to 0.95) and by the examiner (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.83 to 0.97); standard error of measurement ranged between 1kgf to 4kgf at both methods, but they are proportionally lower when stabilized by the examiner. No agreement between both methods was identified for all knee strength measurements and for bilateral hip flexion, right internal and external rotation and left adduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The hand-held dynamometer is reliable for hip and knee strength evaluation despite of the stabilization method. However, for the majority of the movements, greater strength and lower error are expected when the examiner stabilizes it.

摘要

目的

验证使用腰带固定或检查者固定的手持测力计测量髋部和膝部肌肉力量时的组内可靠性及一致性。

设计

重测设计。

设置

使用腰带固定和检查者固定的手持测力计双侧测量膝部和髋部肌肉力量。

参与者

24名年轻健康参与者。

主要观察指标

通过组内相关系数和测量标准误差验证可靠性。通过Bland Altman法验证固定方法之间的一致性。

结果

当由腰带固定(组内相关系数=0.78至0.95)和由检查者固定(组内相关系数=0.83至0.97)时,所有肌肉群的可靠性均极佳;两种方法的测量标准误差在1千克力至4千克力之间,但由检查者固定时误差相对较低。对于所有膝部力量测量以及双侧髋部屈曲、右侧内旋和外旋以及左侧内收,两种方法之间未发现一致性。

结论

无论采用何种固定方法,手持测力计对于髋部和膝部力量评估都是可靠的。然而,对于大多数动作,由检查者固定时预计力量更大且误差更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验