Perry J R B, Ferrucci L, Bandinelli S, Guralnik J, Semba R D, Rice N, Melzer D, Saxena R, Scott L J, McCarthy M I, Hattersley A T, Zeggini E, Weedon M N, Frayling T M
Peninsula Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Diabetologia. 2009 Oct;52(10):2117-21. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1475-8. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Circulating beta-carotene levels are inversely associated with risk of type 2 diabetes, but the causal direction of this association is not certain. In this study we used a Mendelian randomisation approach to provide evidence for or against the causal role of the antioxidant vitamin beta-carotene in type 2 diabetes.
We used a common polymorphism (rs6564851) near the BCMO1 gene, which is strongly associated with circulating beta-carotene levels (p = 2 x 10(-24)), with each G allele associated with a 0.27 standard deviation increase in levels. We used data from the InCHIANTI and Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM) studies to estimate the association between beta-carotene levels and type 2 diabetes. We next used a triangulation approach to estimate the expected effect of rs6564851 on type 2 diabetes risk and compared this with the observed effect using data from 4549 type 2 diabetes patients and 5579 controls from the Diabetes Genetics Replication And Meta-analysis (DIAGRAM) Consortium.
A 0.27 standard deviation increase in beta-carotene levels was associated with an OR of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.95) for type 2 diabetes in the InCHIANTI study. This association was similar to that of the ULSAM study (OR 0.90 [0.84-0.97]). In contrast, there was no association between rs6564851 and type 2 diabetes (OR 0.98 [0.93-1.04], p = 0.58); this effect size was also smaller than that expected, given the known associations between rs6564851 and beta-carotene levels, and the associations between beta-carotene levels and type 2 diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our findings in this Mendelian randomisation study are in keeping with randomised controlled trials suggesting that beta-carotene is not causally protective against type 2 diabetes.
目的/假设:循环β-胡萝卜素水平与2型糖尿病风险呈负相关,但这种关联的因果方向尚不确定。在本研究中,我们采用孟德尔随机化方法来提供证据,支持或反对抗氧化维生素β-胡萝卜素在2型糖尿病中的因果作用。
我们使用了BCMO1基因附近的一个常见多态性(rs6564851),它与循环β-胡萝卜素水平密切相关(p = 2×10⁻²⁴),每个G等位基因与水平升高0.27个标准差相关。我们使用了来自InCHIANTI研究和乌普萨拉成年男性纵向研究(ULSAM)的数据,以估计β-胡萝卜素水平与2型糖尿病之间的关联。接下来,我们采用三角测量法来估计rs6564851对2型糖尿病风险的预期影响,并将其与使用来自糖尿病遗传学复制与荟萃分析(DIAGRAM)联盟中4549例2型糖尿病患者和5579例对照的数据所观察到的影响进行比较。
在InCHIANTI研究中,β-胡萝卜素水平升高0.27个标准差与2型糖尿病的比值比为0.90(95%可信区间0.86 - 0.95)相关。这种关联与ULSAM研究的结果相似(比值比0.90 [0.84 - 0.97])。相比之下,rs6564851与2型糖尿病之间没有关联(比值比0.98 [0.93 - 1.04],p = 0.58);考虑到rs6564851与β-胡萝卜素水平之间以及β-胡萝卜素水平与2型糖尿病之间已知的关联,这个效应大小也小于预期。
结论/解读:我们在这项孟德尔随机化研究中的发现与随机对照试验一致,表明β-胡萝卜素对2型糖尿病没有因果性的保护作用。