• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帮助存在质量问题“风险”的养老院:一项全州范围的评估。

Helping nursing homes "at risk" for quality problems: a statewide evaluation.

作者信息

Rantz Marilyn J, Cheshire Debra, Flesner Marcia, Petroski Gregory F, Hicks Lanis, Alexander Greg, Aud Myra A, Siem Carol, Nguyen Katy, Boland Clara, Thomas Sharon

机构信息

Sinclair School of Nursing and Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

出版信息

Geriatr Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):238-49. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.09.003
PMID:19665666
Abstract

The Quality Improvement Program for Missouri (QIPMO), a state school of nursing project to improve quality of care and resident outcomes in nursing homes, has a special focus to help nursing homes identified as "at risk" for quality concerns. In fiscal year 2006, 92 of 492 Medicaid-certified facilities were identified as "at risk" using quality indicators (QIs) derived from Minimum Data Set (MDS) data. Sixty of the 92 facilities accepted offered on-site clinical consultations by gerontological expert nurses with graduate nursing education. Content of consultations include quality improvement, MDS, care planning, evidence-based practice, and effective teamwork. The 60 "at-risk" facilities improved scores 4%-41% for 5 QIs: pressure ulcers (overall and high risk), weight loss, bedfast residents, and falls; other facilities in the state did not. Estimated cost savings (based on prior cost research) for 444 residents who avoided developing these clinical problems in participating "at-risk" facilities was more than $1.5 million for fiscal year 2006. These are similar to estimated savings of $1.6 million for fiscal year 2005 when 439 residents in "at-risk" facilities avoided clinical problems. Estimated savings exceed the total program cost by more than $1 million annually. QI improvements demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of on-site clinical consultation by gerontological expert nurses with graduate nursing education.

摘要

密苏里州质量改进计划(QIPMO)是一所州立护理学院开展的项目,旨在提高养老院的护理质量和居民护理效果,特别关注帮助那些被认定存在质量问题“风险”的养老院。在2006财年,利用从最低数据集(MDS)数据得出的质量指标(QIs),在492家获得医疗补助认证的机构中,有92家被认定为“有风险”。这92家机构中有60家接受了具有护理学研究生学历的老年护理专家护士提供的现场临床咨询。咨询内容包括质量改进、MDS、护理计划、循证实践和有效的团队协作。这60家“有风险”的机构在5项质量指标上的得分提高了4% - 41%,这些指标包括压疮(总体和高风险)、体重减轻、卧床居民以及跌倒;该州的其他机构则没有。据估计,2006财年,参与项目的“有风险”机构中444名居民避免出现这些临床问题所节省的费用(基于之前的成本研究)超过150万美元。这与2005财年的估计节省金额160万美元相似,当时“有风险”机构中的439名居民避免了临床问题。估计节省的费用每年超过项目总成本100多万美元。质量改进证明了具有护理学研究生学历的老年护理专家护士进行现场临床咨询的临床有效性。

相似文献

1
Helping nursing homes "at risk" for quality problems: a statewide evaluation.帮助存在质量问题“风险”的养老院:一项全州范围的评估。
Geriatr Nurs. 2009 Jul-Aug;30(4):238-49. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
2
Nursing home quality and pressure ulcer prevention and management practices.养老院质量与压疮预防及管理措施
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):583-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52166.x.
3
Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program Study: a randomized, controlled prospective comparative value evaluation of 2 pressure ulcer prevention strategies in nursing and rehabilitation centers.压力性溃疡预防计划研究:对护理和康复中心 2 种压力性溃疡预防策略的随机、对照、前瞻性比较价值评估。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Oct;25(10):450-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000421461.21773.32.
4
Development of a risk-adjusted urinary incontinence outcome measure of quality for nursing homes.养老院尿失禁质量风险调整结局指标的开发。
Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):467-78. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053227.95476.02.
5
Identifying star performers: the relationship between ambitious targets and nursing home quality improvement.识别明星员工:宏伟目标与养老院质量提升之间的关系。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1498-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02362.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
6
Cost, staffing and quality impact of bedside electronic medical record (EMR) in nursing homes.养老院床边电子病历(EMR)的成本、人员配备和质量影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Sep;11(7):485-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.010.
7
Improving nursing home quality of care through outcomes data: the MDS quality indicators.通过结果数据改善养老院护理质量:最低数据集质量指标
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 Mar;18(3):250-7. doi: 10.1002/gps.820.
8
The relationship between quality of care and financial performance in nursing homes.养老院护理质量与财务绩效之间的关系。
J Health Care Finance. 2003 Spring;29(3):48-60.
9
Risk adjustment of quality indicators in French long term care facilities for elderly people. A preliminary study.法国老年人长期护理机构质量指标的风险调整:一项初步研究。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2003 Jun;51(3):327-38.
10
Medicaid nursing home pay for performance: where do we stand?医疗补助养老院绩效薪酬:我们目前的状况如何?
Gerontologist. 2009 Oct;49(5):587-95. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp044. Epub 2009 May 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Psychological Consequences of the COVID-19 on Residents and Staff in Nursing Homes.新冠疫情对养老院居民及工作人员的心理影响
Work Aging Retire. 2020 Oct;6(4):254-259. doi: 10.1093/workar/waaa021. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
2
"We are Alone in This Battle": A Framework for a Coordinated Response to COVID-19 in Nursing Homes.“在这场战斗中我们孤立无援”:为养老院协调应对 COVID-19 提供框架。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):316-322. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1773190. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Process, structural, and outcome quality indicators of nutritional care in nursing homes: a systematic review.
养老院营养护理的过程、结构和结果质量指标:一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2828-0.
4
State "technical assistance programs" for nursing home quality improvement: variations and potential implications.养老院质量改进的“技术援助计划”:差异及潜在影响。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2012;24(4):349-67. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2012.735157.
5
Challenges of using quality improvement methods in nursing homes that "need improvement".在需要改进的养老院中使用质量改进方法面临的挑战。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Oct;13(8):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 25.
6
Translating research into practice in nursing homes: can we close the gap?将研究转化为养老院的实践:我们能否缩小差距?
Gerontologist. 2012 Oct;52(5):597-606. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr157. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
7
The coach is in: improving nutritional care in nursing homes.养老院的教练:改善营养护理。
Gerontologist. 2012 Aug;52(4):571-80. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr111. Epub 2011 Nov 1.