Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Helm Standiford, Singh Vijay, Benyamin Ramsin M, Datta Sukdeb, Hayek Salim M, Fellows Bert, Boswell Mark V
Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, USA.
Pain Physician. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(4):E225-64.
Interventional pain management, and the interventional techniques which are an integral part of that specialty, are subject to widely varying definitions and practices. How interventional techniques are applied by various specialties is highly variable, even for the most common procedures and conditions. At the same time, many payors, publications, and guidelines are showing increasing interest in the performance and costs of interventional techniques. There is a lack of consensus among interventional pain management specialists with regards to how to diagnose and manage spinal pain and the type and frequency of spinal interventional techniques which should be utilized to treat spinal pain. Therefore, an algorithmic approach is proposed, providing a step-by-step procedure for managing chronic spinal pain patients based upon evidence-based guidelines. The algorithmic approach is developed based on the best available evidence regarding the epidemiology of various identifiable sources of chronic spinal pain. Such an approach to spinal pain includes an appropriate history, examination, and medical decision making in the management of low back pain, neck pain and thoracic pain. This algorithm also provides diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to clinical management utilizing case examples of cervical, lumbar, and thoracic spinal pain. An algorithm for investigating chronic low back pain without disc herniation commences with a clinical question, examination and imaging findings. If there is evidence of radiculitis, spinal stenosis, or other demonstrable causes resulting in radiculitis, one may proceed with diagnostic or therapeutic epidural injections. In the algorithmic approach, facet joints are entertained first in the algorithm because of their commonality as a source of chronic low back pain followed by sacroiliac joint blocks if indicated and provocation discography as the last step. Based on the literature, in the United States, in patients without disc herniation, lumbar facet joints account for 30% of the cases of chronic low back pain, sacroiliac joints account for less than 10% of these cases, and discogenic pain accounts for 25% of the patients. The management algorithm for lumbar spinal pain includes interventions for somatic pain and radicular pain with either facet joint interventions, sacroiliac joint interventions, or intradiscal therapy. For radicular pain, epidural injections, percutaneous adhesiolysis, percutaneous disc decompression, or spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis may be performed. For non-responsive, recalcitrant, neuropathic pain, implantable therapy may be entertained. In managing pain of cervical origin, if there is evidence of radiculitis, spinal stenosis, post-surgery syndrome, or other demonstrable causes resulting in radiculitis, an interventionalist may proceed with therapeutic epidural injections. An algorithmic approach for chronic neck pain without disc herniation or radiculitis commences with clinical question, physical and imaging findings, followed by diagnostic facet joint injections. Cervical provocation discography is rarely performed. Based on the literature available in the United States, cervical facet joints account for 40% to 50% of cases of chronic neck pain without disc herniation, while discogenic pain accounts for approximately 20% of the patients. The management algorithm includes either facet joint interventions or epidural injections with surgical referral for disc-related pain and rarely implantable therapy. In managing thoracic pain, a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithmic approach includes either facet joint interventions or epidural injections.
介入性疼痛管理以及作为该专业不可或缺部分的介入技术,其定义和实践差异很大。不同专业对介入技术的应用方式差异极大,即便对于最常见的手术和病症也是如此。与此同时,许多支付方、出版物和指南对介入技术的实施情况和成本表现出越来越浓厚的兴趣。在如何诊断和管理脊柱疼痛以及应采用何种类型和频率的脊柱介入技术来治疗脊柱疼痛方面,介入性疼痛管理专家之间缺乏共识。因此,提出了一种算法方法,基于循证指南为慢性脊柱疼痛患者提供逐步的管理程序。该算法方法是根据关于各种可识别的慢性脊柱疼痛来源的流行病学的最佳现有证据制定的。这种针对脊柱疼痛的方法包括在管理腰痛、颈痛和胸痛时进行适当的病史询问、检查和医疗决策。该算法还利用颈、腰和胸段脊柱疼痛的病例示例提供临床管理的诊断和治疗方法。一个用于调查无椎间盘突出的慢性腰痛的算法始于一个临床问题、检查和影像学发现。如果有神经根炎、椎管狭窄或其他可证实的导致神经根炎的原因的证据,则可以进行诊断性或治疗性硬膜外注射。在该算法方法中,由于小关节作为慢性腰痛的常见来源,所以在算法中首先考虑小关节,如有指征则接着进行骶髂关节阻滞,最后一步是激发性椎间盘造影。根据文献,在美国,在无椎间盘突出的患者中,腰椎小关节占慢性腰痛病例的30%,骶髂关节占这些病例的不到10%,椎间盘源性疼痛占患者的25%。腰椎脊柱疼痛的管理算法包括针对躯体疼痛和根性疼痛的干预,采用小关节干预、骶髂关节干预或椎间盘内治疗。对于根性疼痛,可以进行硬膜外注射、经皮粘连松解术、经皮椎间盘减压术或脊柱内镜下粘连松解术。对于无反应的、顽固的神经性疼痛,可以考虑植入式治疗。在管理颈源性疼痛时,如果有神经根炎、椎管狭窄、手术后综合征或其他可证实的导致神经根炎的原因的证据,介入专家可以进行治疗性硬膜外注射。一个针对无椎间盘突出或神经根炎的慢性颈痛的算法始于临床问题、体格检查和影像学发现,接着是诊断性小关节注射。颈椎激发性椎间盘造影很少进行。根据美国现有文献,颈椎小关节占无椎间盘突出的慢性颈痛病例的40%至50%,而椎间盘源性疼痛占患者的约20%。管理算法包括小关节干预或硬膜外注射,对于与椎间盘相关的疼痛进行手术转诊,很少采用植入式治疗。在管理胸痛时,一种诊断和治疗算法方法包括小关节干预或硬膜外注射。