Jain Suman, Visser Leo H, Praveen T L N, Rao P Narasimha, Surekha Thummalakunta, Ellanti Ramesh, Abhishek Thummalakunta L N, Nath Indira
Clinical and Epidemiology Division, Blue Peter Research Centre, LEPRA Society, Cherlapally, Hyderabad, India.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009 Aug 11;3(8):e498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000498.
Leprosy is the most common treatable peripheral nerve disorder worldwide with periods of acute neuritis leading to functional impairment of limbs, ulcer formation and stigmatizing deformities. Since the hallmarks of leprosy are nerve enlargement and inflammation, we used high-resolution sonography (US) and color Doppler (CD) imaging to demonstrate nerve enlargement and inflammation.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: [corrected] We performed bilateral US of the ulnar (UN), median (MN), lateral popliteal (LP) and posterior tibial (PT) nerves in 20 leprosy patients and compared this with the clinical findings in these patients and with the sonographic findings in 30 healthy Indian controls. The nerves were significantly thicker in the leprosy patients as compared to healthy controls (p<0.0001 for each nerve). The two patients without nerve enlargements did not have a type 1 or type 2 reaction or signs of neuritis. The kappa for clinical palpation and nerve enlargement by sonography was 0.30 for all examined nerves (0.32 for UN, 0.41 for PN and 0.13 for LP). Increased neural vascularity by CD imaging was present in 39 of 152 examined nerves (26%). Increased vascularity was observed in multiple nerves in 6 of 12 patients with type 1 reaction and in 3 of 4 patients with type 2 reaction. Significant correlation was observed between clinical parameters of grade of thickening, sensory loss and muscle weakness and US abnormalities of nerve echotexture, endoneural flow and cross-sectional area (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We conclude that clinical examination of enlarged nerves in leprosy patients is subjective and inaccurate, whereas sonography provides an objective measure of nerve damage by showing increased vascularity, distorted echotexture and enlargement. This damage is sonographically more extensive and includes more nerves than clinically expected.
麻风病是全球最常见的可治疗的周围神经疾病,其急性神经炎发作期会导致肢体功能障碍、溃疡形成以及毁容性畸形。由于麻风病的特征是神经增粗和炎症,我们使用高分辨率超声(US)和彩色多普勒(CD)成像来显示神经增粗和炎症。
方法/主要发现:我们对20例麻风病患者的尺神经(UN)、正中神经(MN)、腘外侧神经(LP)和胫后神经(PT)进行了双侧超声检查,并将其与这些患者的临床发现以及30名健康印度对照者的超声检查结果进行比较。与健康对照者相比,麻风病患者的神经明显更粗(每条神经p<0.0001)。两名神经未增粗的患者没有1型或2型反应,也没有神经炎体征。所有检查神经的临床触诊与超声检查发现的神经增粗之间的kappa值为0.30(尺神经为0.32,正中神经为0.41,腘外侧神经为0.13)。在152条检查神经中的39条(26%)通过CD成像观察到神经血管增多。在12例1型反应患者中的6例以及4例2型反应患者中的3例中,多条神经观察到血管增多。在增厚程度、感觉丧失和肌肉无力等级的临床参数与神经回声纹理、神经内膜血流和横截面积的超声异常之间观察到显著相关性(p<0.001)。
结论/意义:我们得出结论,麻风病患者肿大神经的临床检查具有主观性且不准确,而超声检查通过显示血管增多、回声纹理扭曲和神经增粗,提供了一种客观的神经损伤测量方法。这种损伤在超声检查中比临床预期更广泛,涉及更多神经。