• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童开放式与腹腔镜修复性直肠结肠切除术的比较。

A comparison of open and laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy in children.

作者信息

Tan Y W, Jaffray B

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Oct;25(10):877-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-009-2443-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00383-009-2443-6
PMID:19669153
Abstract

AIM

To compare laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy (RP) in children with the same operation performed using open surgery.

METHODS

Case-control comparison of two consecutive cohorts undergoing procto-colectomy by one surgeon. Outcome variables measured were: operating time, blood loss, hospital stay and complication rates.

RESULTS

Twenty-two children, mean age 13 years, underwent RP. Eleven laparoscopic cases were compared with the preceding open case. There was no difference in operating time (443 vs. 403 min, P = 0.479), blood loss (159 vs. 417 ml, P = 0.082), complication rate (4 vs. 1) or hospital stay (14 vs. 19 days, P = 0.192).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic RP is feasible and safe in children. The small number of children recruited may mask benefits in blood loss and hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

目的

比较儿童腹腔镜保留直肠结肠切除术(RP)与开放式手术进行的相同手术。

方法

对由一名外科医生连续进行直肠结肠切除术的两个队列进行病例对照比较。测量的结果变量包括:手术时间、失血量、住院时间和并发症发生率。

结果

22名儿童,平均年龄13岁,接受了RP手术。将11例腹腔镜手术病例与之前的开放手术病例进行比较。手术时间(443对403分钟,P = 0.479)、失血量(159对417毫升,P = 0.082)、并发症发生率(4对1)或住院时间(14对19天,P = 0.192)均无差异。

结论

腹腔镜RP手术在儿童中是可行且安全的。招募的儿童数量较少可能掩盖了腹腔镜手术在失血量和住院时间方面的优势。

相似文献

1
A comparison of open and laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy in children.儿童开放式与腹腔镜修复性直肠结肠切除术的比较。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2009 Oct;25(10):877-9. doi: 10.1007/s00383-009-2443-6.
2
A comparison of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy in children.儿童腹腔镜与开放修复性直肠结肠切除术的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Feb;49(2):262-4; discussion 264. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.11.034. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
3
Total laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: are there advantages compared with the open and hand-assisted approaches?全腹腔镜直肠结肠切除重建术:与开放手术和手辅助手术相比有优势吗?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):541-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9168-1. Epub 2008 Feb 27.
4
Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy.腹腔镜和开腹直肠结肠切除术的结果。
Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1160-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9535. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
5
Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy.腹腔镜保留直肠全结肠切除术:与开放式保留直肠全结肠切除术的病例匹配对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 May;43(5):604-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02235570.
6
Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with and without previous subtotal colectomy.有或无既往次全结肠切除术的腹腔镜保留直肠全结肠切除术
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):296-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01590.x. Epub 2008 May 29.
7
Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study.手辅助腹腔镜保留直肠全结肠切除术的益处:一项对比研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1371-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0587-y.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted and open total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis in children and adolescents.腹腔镜辅助与开腹全直肠结肠切除加回肠储袋肛管吻合术治疗儿童和青少年的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jul;48(7):1546-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.08.031.
9
Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a 10-year experience of an evolving technique.腹腔镜直肠结肠切除术:一种不断发展的技术的 10 年经验。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Oct;13(10):1153-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02443.x.
10
Evaluation of one-stage laparoscopic-assisted restorative proctocolectomy at a specialty center: comparison with the open approach.专科中心一期腹腔镜辅助保留直肠全结肠切除术的评估:与开放手术的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Mar;52(3):394-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e318197d72d.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of children and adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.腹腔镜手术在儿童及青少年炎症性肠病治疗中的作用。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e874. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000874.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with and without previous subtotal colectomy.有或无既往次全结肠切除术的腹腔镜保留直肠全结肠切除术
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):296-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01590.x. Epub 2008 May 29.
2
The effect of restorative proctocolectomy on sexual function, urinary function, fertility, pregnancy and delivery: a systematic review.全直肠系膜切除对性功能、泌尿功能、生育能力、妊娠及分娩的影响:一项系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Aug;50(8):1128-38. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0240-7.
3
Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience.
腹腔镜回肠储袋肛管吻合术的安全性、可行性及短期疗效:单中心病例匹配经验
Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):667-70; discussion 670-2. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000216762.83407.d2.
4
Long-term results after colectomy and ileoanal pull-through procedure in children.儿童结肠切除术和回肠肛管拖出术的长期结果
Arch Surg. 1996 Aug;131(8):881-5; discussion 885-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430200091016.
5
Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis.全结肠直肠切除术,回肠储袋肛管吻合术
Br J Surg. 1980 Aug;67(8):533-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800670802.