关于目标、利益与挣扎：一份关于临床伦理咨询的意见分歧报告 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Of goals and goods and floundering about: a dissensus report on clinical ethics consultation.

作者信息

Bishop Jeffrey P, Fanning Joseph B, Bliton Mark J

机构信息

Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University, 2525 West End Avenue, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

HEC Forum. 2009 Sep;21(3):275-91. doi: 10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1.

DOI:10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1

PMID:19669702

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Of goals and goods and floundering about: a dissensus report on clinical ethics consultation.关于目标、利益与挣扎：一份关于临床伦理咨询的意见分歧报告

HEC Forum. 2009 Sep;21(3):275-91. doi: 10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1.

What are the goals of ethics consultation? A consensus statement.伦理咨询的目标是什么？一份共识声明。

J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):122-6.

A feminist model for clinical ethics consultation: increasing attention to context and narrative.一种临床伦理咨询的女性主义模式：对背景和叙事的关注度不断提高。

HEC Forum. 1997 Sep;9(3):212-27. doi: 10.1023/a:1008888920020.

Evaluating outcomes in ethics consultation research.评估伦理咨询研究中的结果。

J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):127-38.

Evaluating ethics consultation: framing the questions.评估伦理咨询：构建问题

J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):109-15.

Evaluation research and the future of ethics consultation.评估研究与伦理咨询的未来。

J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):146-9.

Moving the conversation forward.推动对话继续进行。

J Clin Ethics. 1999 Spring;10(1):49-56.

Is ethics consultation an elegant distraction?伦理咨询是一种巧妙的干扰吗？

HEC Forum. 1996 Jan;8(1):12-21; discussion 22-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00057972.

Clinical ethics consultations: some reflections on the report of the SHHV-SBC.临床伦理咨询：对SHHV-SBC报告的一些思考。

J Clin Ethics. 1999 Spring;10(1):5-12.

Obstacles and opportunities in the design of ethics consultation evaluation.伦理咨询评估设计中的障碍与机遇

J Clin Ethics. 1996 Summer;7(2):139-45.

引用本文的文献

The standardization of clinical ethics consultation and technique's "long encirclement" of humanity: a response to Brummett and Muaygil.临床伦理咨询的标准化和技术对人性的“长期包围”：对布鲁梅特和穆阿吉尔的回应。

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021 Oct 12;16(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00112-y.

Phenomenology, Saudi Arabia, and an argument for the standardization of clinical ethics consultation.现象学、沙特阿拉伯和临床伦理咨询标准化的论据

Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021 Mar 12;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6.

The Pitfalls of Proceduralism: An Exploration of the Goods Internal to the Practice of Clinical Ethics Consultation.程序主义的陷阱：临床伦理咨询实践中的内在善之探究

HEC Forum. 2018 Dec;30(4):389-403. doi: 10.1007/s10730-018-9359-2.

The use of an online comment system in clinical ethics consultation.在线评论系统在临床伦理咨询中的应用。

AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):153-160. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2017.1335808. Epub 2017 May 30.

Ethics outside of inpatient care: the need for alliances between clinical and organizational ethics.住院护理之外的伦理：临床伦理与组织伦理之间建立联盟的必要性。

HEC Forum. 2014 Dec;26(4):309-23. doi: 10.1007/s10730-014-9238-4.

Nonbeneficial treatment and conflict resolution: building consensus.非有益治疗与冲突解决：建立共识

Perm J. 2013 Summer;17(3):23-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/12-124.

Quality attestation for clinical ethics consultants: a two-step model from the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.临床伦理顾问的质量认证：美国生物伦理学和人文学会的两步模型。

Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Sep-Oct;43(5):26-36. doi: 10.1002/hast.198.

Quality in ethics consultations.伦理咨询的质量。

Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):761-74. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9489-x.

Mapping our practice? Some conceptual "bumps" for us to consider.规划我们的实践？一些需要我们思考的概念性“障碍”。

HEC Forum. 2012 Sep;24(3):219-26. doi: 10.1007/s10730-012-9188-7.

The Core Competencies: a Roman Catholic critique.核心能力：一种罗马天主教的批判。

HEC Forum. 2011 Sep;23(3):147-69. doi: 10.1007/s10730-011-9169-2.

本文引用的文献

Credentialing ethics consultants: an invitation to collaboration.认证伦理顾问：合作邀请

Am J Bioeth. 2007 Feb;7(2):35-7. doi: 10.1080/15265160601109366.

Quality of care in U.S. hospitals as reflected by standardized measures, 2002-2004.2002 - 2004年美国医院标准化指标所反映的医疗质量

N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):255-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa043778.

What kind of doing is clinical ethics?临床伦理学是怎样的一种实践？

Theor Med Bioeth. 2005;26(1):7-24. doi: 10.1007/s11017-004-4802-6.

The professionalization of ethics: some implications for accountability in medicine.伦理的专业化：对医学问责制的一些影响。

Soundings. 1977 Spring;60(1):40-53.

Are we professionals? A critical look at the social role of bioethicists.我们是专业人士吗？对生物伦理学家社会角色的批判性审视。

Daedalus. 1999 Fall;128(4):253-74.

Who ate the apple? A commentary on the Core Competencies report.谁吃了苹果？对《核心能力报告》的评论。

HEC Forum. 1999 Jun;11(2):170-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1008904411945.

The Task Force report: comprehensible forest or unknown beetles?

J Clin Ethics. 1999 Spring;10(1):26-33.

Ethics consultants: could they do better?伦理顾问：他们能做得更好吗？

J Clin Ethics. 1999 Spring;10(1):13-25.

The eclipse of the individual in policy (where is the place for justice?).政策中个人的黯然失色（正义何在？）

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1996 Fall;5(4):519-32. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100007416.

Listening or telling? Thoughts on responsibility in clinical ethics consultation.倾听还是讲述？关于临床伦理咨询中责任的思考。

Theor Med. 1996 Sep;17(3):255-77. doi: 10.1007/BF00489449.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验