Zaner R M
Center for Clinical and Research Ethics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Theor Med. 1996 Sep;17(3):255-77. doi: 10.1007/BF00489449.
This article reviews the historical and current controversies about the nature of clinical ethics consultation, as a way to focus on the place and responsibility of ethics consultants within the context of clinical conversation--interpreted as a form of dialogue. These matters are approached through a particularly compelling instance of the controversy that involves several major figures in the field. The analysis serves to highlight very significant questions of the nature and constraints of clinical situations, and the moral responsibility and legal accountability that are especially important for clinical ethics consultants.
本文回顾了关于临床伦理咨询性质的历史和当前争议,以此聚焦伦理咨询师在临床对话(被视为一种对话形式)背景下的地位和责任。这些问题通过一个特别引人注目的争议案例来探讨,该案例涉及该领域的几位主要人物。该分析旨在突出临床情境的性质和限制以及道德责任和法律问责等非常重要的问题,这些问题对临床伦理咨询师尤为重要。