Suppr超能文献

倾听还是讲述?关于临床伦理咨询中责任的思考。

Listening or telling? Thoughts on responsibility in clinical ethics consultation.

作者信息

Zaner R M

机构信息

Center for Clinical and Research Ethics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Theor Med. 1996 Sep;17(3):255-77. doi: 10.1007/BF00489449.

Abstract

This article reviews the historical and current controversies about the nature of clinical ethics consultation, as a way to focus on the place and responsibility of ethics consultants within the context of clinical conversation--interpreted as a form of dialogue. These matters are approached through a particularly compelling instance of the controversy that involves several major figures in the field. The analysis serves to highlight very significant questions of the nature and constraints of clinical situations, and the moral responsibility and legal accountability that are especially important for clinical ethics consultants.

摘要

本文回顾了关于临床伦理咨询性质的历史和当前争议,以此聚焦伦理咨询师在临床对话(被视为一种对话形式)背景下的地位和责任。这些问题通过一个特别引人注目的争议案例来探讨,该案例涉及该领域的几位主要人物。该分析旨在突出临床情境的性质和限制以及道德责任和法律问责等非常重要的问题,这些问题对临床伦理咨询师尤为重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验