现象学、沙特阿拉伯和临床伦理咨询标准化的论据
Phenomenology, Saudi Arabia, and an argument for the standardization of clinical ethics consultation.
机构信息
Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, 3331 Squirrel Court, Auburn Hills, MI, 48326, USA.
College of Medicine, King Saud University and King Saud University Medical City, 6877 Ibrahim Ibn Hadi, Riyadh, 12476, Saudi Arabia.
出版信息
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021 Mar 12;16(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00099-6.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study is to make a philosophical argument against the phenomenological critique of standardization in clinical ethics. We used the context of clinical ethics in Saudi Arabia to demonstrate the importance of credentialing clinical ethicists.
METHODS
Philosophical methods of argumentation and conceptual analysis were used.
RESULTS
We found the phenomenological critique of standardization to be flawed because it relies on a series of false dichotomies.
CONCLUSIONS
We concluded that the phenomenological framing of the credentialing debate relies upon two extreme views to be navigated between, not chosen among, in the credentialing of clinical ethicists.
背景
本研究旨在从哲学角度对临床伦理标准化的现象学批判提出质疑。我们以沙特阿拉伯的临床伦理为例，展示了为临床伦理学家提供资质认证的重要性。
方法
运用论证和概念分析的哲学方法。
结果
我们发现，标准化的现象学批判存在缺陷，因为它依赖于一系列错误的二分法。
结论
我们的结论是，在为临床伦理学家提供资质认证的过程中， credentialing debate 的现象学框架依赖于两种极端观点之间的协调，而不是选择其中之一。
Zotero 插件