• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病急性冠状动脉综合征的临床结局:来自瑞士急性左主干冠状动脉血管经皮管理(SALVage)研究的结果。

Clinical outcomes after PCI for acute coronary syndrome in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Swiss Acute Left Main Coronary Vessel Percutaneous Management (SALVage) study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):697-704. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A112.

DOI:10.4244/EIJV7I6A112
PMID:21986328
Abstract

AIMS

Unprotected left main (ULM) coronary artery disease is encountered in 3%-10% of coronary angiograms and is associated with high mortality. The survival of patients with ULM disease presenting with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) depends on different variables and is lowest in those with cardiogenic shock (CS). The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of baseline characteristics on the subsequent clinical outcome in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of ULM for ACS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients were retrieved from our database and followed by phone or physician visit. Patients were classified into two groups according to their presentation (CS/STEMI group: patients presenting with CS or ST-elevation myocardial infarction; NSTEMI/UA group: patients with non-STEMI or unstable angina). Data collected were baseline characteristics, procedural information, and clinical outcome. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 6-month follow-up. The secondary end point was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularisation, i.e., major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Kaplan-Meier curves were computed for survival. Logistic regression determined that hypercholesterolaemia (OR 6.22, p=0.03), high pre-procedural TIMI score (OR 3.89, p=0.01), preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 1.07, p=0.01) and LM as culprit lesion (OR 8.57, p=0.01) protected against development of CS. Primary outcome occurred in 44% of patients in the CS/STEMI group compared to 6% in the NSTEMI/UA group (p<0.001). MACE were observed in 30 patients (48%) of the CS/STEMI group and in 12 patients (19%) of the NSTEMI/UA group (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute coronary syndrome due to critical ULM stenosis is associated with high mortality even after successful PCI. Patients presenting with CS or STEMI are at particular risk.

摘要

目的

无保护左主干(ULM)冠状动脉疾病在冠状动脉造影中占 3%-10%,与高死亡率相关。急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的 ULM 疾病的生存率取决于不同的变量,在伴有心源性休克(CS)的患者中最低。本研究的目的是评估基线特征对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ULM 治疗 ACS 患者后续临床结局的影响。

方法和结果

从我们的数据库中检索了 134 例患者,并通过电话或医生访视进行随访。根据患者的表现(CS/STEMI 组:出现 CS 或 ST 段抬高心肌梗死的患者;NSTEMI/UA 组:非 ST 段抬高心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛患者)将患者分为两组。收集的数据包括基线特征、手术信息和临床结局。主要终点是 6 个月随访时的全因死亡率。次要终点是心脏死亡、心肌梗死和任何再次血运重建的复合终点,即主要不良心脏事件(MACE)。绘制了生存的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线。逻辑回归确定高胆固醇血症(OR 6.22,p=0.03)、高术前 TIMI 评分(OR 3.89,p=0.01)、保留的左心室射血分数(OR 1.07,p=0.01)和 LM 为罪犯病变(OR 8.57,p=0.01)可预防 CS 的发生。CS/STEMI 组中有 44%的患者发生主要结局,而 NSTEMI/UA 组中仅有 6%的患者发生(p<0.001)。CS/STEMI 组中有 30 例(48%)患者发生 MACE,而 NSTEMI/UA 组中有 12 例(19%)患者发生 MACE(p=0.001)。

结论

由严重 ULM 狭窄引起的急性冠状动脉综合征即使在成功的 PCI 后也与高死亡率相关。出现 CS 或 STEMI 的患者风险特别高。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes after PCI for acute coronary syndrome in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Swiss Acute Left Main Coronary Vessel Percutaneous Management (SALVage) study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病急性冠状动脉综合征的临床结局:来自瑞士急性左主干冠状动脉血管经皮管理(SALVage)研究的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):697-704. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A112.
2
Outcome in high risk patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.高危无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):101-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22205.
3
Angiographic and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes presenting with isolated anterior ST-segment depression: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38) substudy.急性冠状动脉综合征伴孤立性前 ST 段压低患者的血管造影和临床结局:TRITON-TIMI 38 试验(评估优化血小板抑制治疗对心肌梗死的治疗结果改善的试验 38)亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.012.
4
Comparison between the NERS (New Risk Stratification) score and the SYNTAX (Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score in outcome prediction for unprotected left main stenting.对比 NERS(新风险分层)评分和 SYNTAX(经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与心脏手术联合治疗)评分在非保护左主干支架置入术预后预测中的价值。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun;3(6):632-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.006.
5
Prognostic impact of significant non-infarct-related left main coronary artery disease in patients with acute myocardial infarction who receive a culprit-lesion percutaneous coronary intervention.接受罪犯病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者中,显著的非梗死相关左主干冠状动脉疾病的预后影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):307-14. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283519f25.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
7
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in patients receiving clopidogrel therapy after diagnostic angiography for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes.诊断性冠状动脉造影后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中应用比伐卢定的疗效和安全性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Oct 1;76(4):513-24. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22546.
8
Impact of renal failure on all-cause mortality and other outcomes in patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention.肾衰竭对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者全因死亡率及其他预后的影响。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Nov;108(11):554-62. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
9
Plaque composition and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients with metabolic syndrome or diabetes.代谢综合征或糖尿病的急性冠脉综合征患者的斑块成分与临床结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;5(3 Suppl):S42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.01.008.
10
Percutaneous left main coronary disease treatment without on-site surgery back-up in patients with acute coronary syndromes: immediate and 2-year outcomes.急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗,无现场手术后备:即刻和 2 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May 1;79(6):979-87. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23225. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Follow-up Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main.无保护左主干原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期随访光学相干断层扫描评估
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 19;25(12):445. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512445. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Contemporary Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A State-of-the-art Review.当代左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:最新综述
Interv Cardiol. 2023 May 26;18:e20. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.02. eCollection 2023.
3
Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock Secondary to Total Occlusive Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesion-Related Acute Myocardial Infarction.
继发于完全闭塞性无保护左主干冠状动脉病变相关急性心肌梗死的心源性休克患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的临床结局
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 7;12(4):1311. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041311.
4
Impact of electrocardiographic morphology on clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction receiving coronary angiography and intervention: a retrospective study.心电图形态对接受冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响:一项回顾性研究
PeerJ. 2020 May 7;8:e8796. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8796. eCollection 2020.
5
Temporal Trends and Site Variation in High-Risk Coronary Intervention and the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.高危冠状动脉介入治疗和机械循环支持的时间趋势和部位差异:来自退伍军人事务临床评估报告和跟踪(CART)计划的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e014906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014906. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
6
Climbing the hill of left main coronary artery revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft?攀登左主干冠状动脉血运重建之峰:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗还是冠状动脉旁路移植术?
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Feb;10(2):576-580. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.12.116.
7
Long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent-PCI for unprotected left main disease: a meta-analysis.冠状动脉搭桥术与支架置入经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干疾病的长期预后:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0664-5.
8
Long-term prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction due to unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a single-centre experience over 14 years.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病所致急性心肌梗死患者的长期预后:一项14年的单中心经验
Singapore Med J. 2016 Jul;57(7):396-400. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016121.
9
Acute myocardial infarction due to left main coronary artery disease in men and women: does ST-segment elevation matter?男性和女性左主干冠状动脉疾病所致急性心肌梗死:ST段抬高是否重要?
Arch Med Sci. 2015 Dec 10;11(6):1197-204. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.56345. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
10
Treatment strategies in the left main coronary artery disease associated with acute coronary syndromes.与急性冠状动脉综合征相关的左主干冠状动脉疾病的治疗策略。
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015 Oct;27(4):272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 21.