Department of Cardiology, St James' Hospital, St James' Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):135-44. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22164.
Critical coronary stenoses have been shown to contribute to only a minority of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and sudden cardiac death. Autopsy studies have identified a subgroup of high-risk patients with disrupted vulnerable plaque and modest stenosis. Consequently, a clinical need exists to develop methods to identify these plaques prospectively before disruption and clinical expression of disease. Recent advances in invasive and noninvasive imaging techniques have shown the potential to identify these high-risk plaques. The anatomical characteristics of the vulnerable plaque such as thin cap fibroatheroma and lipid pool can be identified with angioscopy, high frequency intravascular ultrasound, intravascular MRI, and optical coherence tomography. Efforts have also been made to recognize active inflammation in high-risk plaques using intravascular thermography. Plaque chemical composition by measuring electromagnetic radiation using spectroscopy is also an emerging technology to detect vulnerable plaques. Noninvasive imaging with MRI, CT, and PET also holds the potential to differentiate between low and high-risk plaques. However, at present none of these imaging modalities are able to detect vulnerable plaque neither has been shown to definitively predict outcome. Nevertheless in contrast, there has been a parallel development in the physiological assessment of advanced atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Thus recent trials using fractional flow reserve in patients with modest non flow-limiting stenoses have shown that deferral of PCI with optimal medical therapy in these patients is superior to coronary intervention. Further trials are needed to provide more information regarding the natural history of high-risk but non flow-limiting plaque to establish patient-specific targeted therapy and to refine plaque stabilizing strategies in the future.
严重的冠状动脉狭窄仅被认为是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和心源性猝死的少数原因。尸检研究已经确定了一小部分高危患者,他们的斑块不稳定且狭窄程度适中。因此,需要开发方法来在斑块破裂和疾病临床表现之前,前瞻性地识别这些斑块。最近,侵袭性和非侵袭性成像技术的进展显示出了识别这些高危斑块的潜力。易损斑块的解剖学特征,如薄帽纤维粥样瘤和脂质池,可以通过血管镜、高频血管内超声、血管内 MRI 和光相干断层扫描来识别。也有人努力使用血管内热成像来识别高危斑块中的活跃炎症。通过使用光谱学测量电磁辐射来测量斑块的化学成分也是一种新兴的检测易损斑块的技术。使用 MRI、CT 和 PET 进行非侵入性成像也有可能区分低风险和高风险斑块。然而,目前这些成像方式都无法检测到易损斑块,也没有一种方法能够明确预测结果。相比之下,在先进的动脉粥样硬化性冠状动脉疾病的生理学评估方面也取得了平行的进展。因此,最近在非狭窄限制的中度狭窄患者中使用血流储备分数的试验表明,在这些患者中,通过最佳药物治疗延迟 PCI 优于冠状动脉介入治疗。需要进一步的试验来提供更多关于高危但非狭窄限制斑块的自然史的信息,以确定针对特定患者的靶向治疗,并在未来完善斑块稳定策略。