Hommerson Paul, Khan Amjad M, Bristow Tony, Harrison Mark W, de Jong Gerhardus J, Somsen Govert W
Department of Biomedical Analysis, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2009 Sep;23(18):2878-84. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4206.
Capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry (CE/MS) is predominantly carried out using electrospray ionization (ESI). Recently, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) have become available for CE/MS. With the VUV lamp turned off, the APPI source may also be used for CE/MS by thermospray ionization (TSI). In the present study the suitability of ESI, APCI, APPI and TSI for drug impurity profiling by CE/MS in the positive ion mode is evaluated. The drugs carbachol, lidocaine and proguanil and their potential impurities were used as test compounds, representing different molecular polarities. A background electrolyte of 100 mM acetic acid (pH 4.5) provided baseline separation of nearly all impurities from the respective drugs. APPI yielded both even- and odd-electron ions, whereas the other ionization techniques produced even-electron ions only. In-source fragmentation was more pronounced with APCI and APPI than with ESI and TSI, which was most obvious for proguanil and its impurities. In general, ESI and TSI appeared the most efficient ionization techniques for impurities that are charged in solution achieving detection limits of 100 ng/mL (full-scan mode). APPI and APCI showed a lower efficiency, but allowed ionization of low and high polarity analytes, although quaternary ammonium compounds (e.g. carbachol) could not be detected. Largely neutral compounds, such as the lidocaine impurity 2,6-dimethylaniline, could not be detected by TSI, and yielded similar detection limits (500 ng/mL) for ESI, APPI and APCI. In many cases, impurity detection at the 0.1% (w/w) level was possible when 1 mg/mL of parent drug was injected with at least one of the CE/MS systems. Overall, the tested CE/MS systems provide complementary information as illustrated by the detection and identification of an unknown impurity in carbachol.
毛细管电泳/质谱联用(CE/MS)主要采用电喷雾电离(ESI)进行。最近,大气压化学电离(APCI)和大气压光致电离(APPI)已可用于CE/MS。在关闭真空紫外灯的情况下,APPI源也可通过热喷雾电离(TSI)用于CE/MS。在本研究中,评估了ESI、APCI、APPI和TSI在正离子模式下用于CE/MS药物杂质分析的适用性。选用卡巴胆碱、利多卡因和氯胍及其潜在杂质作为测试化合物,它们代表了不同的分子极性。100 mM乙酸(pH 4.5)的背景电解质实现了几乎所有杂质与各自药物的基线分离。APPI产生了偶电子离子和奇电子离子,而其他电离技术仅产生偶电子离子。APCI和APPI的源内裂解比ESI和TSI更明显,这在氯胍及其杂质中最为明显。一般来说,对于溶液中带电的杂质,ESI和TSI似乎是最有效的电离技术,全扫描模式下的检测限为100 ng/mL。APPI和APCI的效率较低,但能够使低极性和高极性分析物电离,不过季铵化合物(如卡巴胆碱)无法检测到。对于TSI,像利多卡因杂质2,6 - 二甲基苯胺这样的大部分呈中性的化合物无法检测到,而ESI、APPI和APCI对其的检测限相似(500 ng/mL)。在许多情况下,当注入1 mg/mL的母体药物时,使用至少一种CE/MS系统能够检测到0.1%(w/w)水平的杂质。总体而言,如卡巴胆碱中一种未知杂质的检测和鉴定所示,所测试的CE/MS系统提供了互补信息。