Northern Ireland Public Health Laboratory, Department of Bacteriology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Med Mycol. 2010 Feb;48(1):166-76.e1. doi: 10.3109/13693780903127506.
This study compares conventional and molecular techniques for the detection of fungi in 77 adult cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Three different methods were investigated, i.e., (1) conventional microbiological culture (including yeasts and filamentous fungi), (2) mycological culture with CF-derived fungal specific culture media, and (3) Non-culture and direct DNA extraction from patient sputa. Fungi isolated from environmental air samples of the CF unit were compared to fungi in sputa from CF patients. Fungi (n = 107) were detected in 14/77(18%) of patients by method 1, in 60/77 (78%) of patients by method 2 and with method 3, in 77/77(100%) of the patients. The majority of yeasts isolated were Candida albicans and C. dubliniensis. Exophiala (Wangiella) dermatitidis, Scedosporium apiospermum, Penicillium spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, and Aspergillus versicolor were also identified by sequence analysis of the rDNA short internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) region. Conventional laboratory analysis failed to detect fungi in 63 patients mainly due to overgrowth by Gram-negative organisms. Mycological culture with antibiotics dramatically increased the number of fungi that could be detected. Molecular techniques detected fungi such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Malassezia spp., Fuscoporia ferrea, Fusarium culmorum, Acremonium strictum, Thanatephorus cucumeris and Cladosporium spp. which were not found with other methods. This study demonstrates that several potentially important fungi may not be detected if mycological culture methods alone are used. A polyphasic approach employing both enhanced mycological culture with molecular detection will help determine the presence of fungi in the sputa of patients with CF and their healthcare environment.
本研究比较了传统和分子技术在 77 例成人囊性纤维化(CF)患者中真菌的检测。研究了三种不同的方法,即(1)传统微生物培养(包括酵母和丝状真菌),(2)CF 衍生的真菌专用培养基的真菌培养,以及(3)非培养和直接从患者痰液中提取 DNA。将 CF 病房环境空气样本中分离出的真菌与 CF 患者痰液中的真菌进行比较。方法 1 检测到 77 例患者中有 14 例(18%)患者有真菌,方法 2 检测到 60 例(78%)患者有真菌,方法 3 检测到 77 例(100%)患者有真菌。分离出的大多数酵母为白色念珠菌和杜氏念珠菌。经 rDNA 短内部转录间隔区(ITS2)区域序列分析,还鉴定出外瓶霉(Wangiella)皮炎、枝孢霉属、青霉属、烟曲霉和杂色曲霉。常规实验室分析主要由于革兰氏阴性菌过度生长而未能检测到真菌。含抗生素的真菌培养极大地增加了可检测到的真菌数量。分子技术检测到了一些真菌,如酿酒酵母、马拉色菌属、粗皮侧耳、尖孢镰刀菌、枝孢霉属、弯颈霉属和枝孢霉属,而其他方法未检测到这些真菌。本研究表明,如果仅使用真菌培养方法,可能会漏检一些潜在的重要真菌。采用增强的真菌培养和分子检测的多相方法,将有助于确定 CF 患者及其医疗环境中痰液中真菌的存在。