Suppr超能文献

临床光子和电子束剂量学中塑料模体校正因子的蒙特卡罗计算。

Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plastic phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry.

作者信息

Araki Fujio, Hanyu Yuji, Fukuoka Miyoko, Matsumoto Kenji, Okumura Masahiko, Oguchi Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Radiological Technology, Kumamoto University School of Health Sciences, 4-24-1, Kuhonji, Kumamoto 862-0976, Japan.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2009 Jul;36(7):2992-3001. doi: 10.1118/1.3151809.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to calculate correction factors for plastic water (PW) and plastic water diagnostic-therapy (PWDT) phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code system. A water-to-plastic ionization conversion factor k(pl) for PW and PWDT was computed for several commonly used Farmer-type ionization chambers with different wall materials in the range of 4-18 MV photon beams. For electron beams, a depth-scaling factor c(pl) and a chamber-dependent fluence correction factor h(pl) for both phantoms were also calculated in combination with NACP-02 and Roos plane-parallel ionization chambers in the range of 4-18 MeV. The h(pl) values for the plane-parallel chambers were evaluated from the electron fluence correction factor phi(pl)w and wall correction factors P(wall,w) and P(wall,pl) for a combination of water or plastic materials. The calculated k(pl) and h(pl) values were verified by comparison with the measured values. A set of k(pl) values computed for the Farmer-type chambers was equal to unity within 0.5% for PW and PWDT in photon beams. The k(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. For electron beams, the c(pl) values computed for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.000 and from 0.992 to 0.997, respectively, in the range of 4-18 MeV. The phi(pl)w values for PW and PWDT were from 0.998 to 1.001 and from 1.004 to 1.001, respectively, at a reference depth in the range of 4-18 MeV. The difference in P(wall) between water and plastic materials for the plane-parallel chambers was 0.8% at a maximum. Finally, h(pl) values evaluated for plastic materials were equal to unity within 0.6% for NACP-02 and Roos chambers. The h(pl) values also agreed within their combined uncertainty with the measured data. The absorbed dose to water from ionization chamber measurements in PW and PWDT plastic materials corresponds to that in water within 1%. Both phantoms can thus be used as a substitute for water for photon and electron dosimetry.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用EGSnrc蒙特卡罗代码系统计算临床光子和电子束剂量测定中塑料水(PW)和塑料水诊断治疗(PWDT)模体的校正因子。针对4 - 18 MV光子束范围内不同壁材料的几种常用Farmer型电离室,计算了PW和PWDT的水 - 塑料电离转换因子k(pl)。对于电子束,还结合NACP - 02和Roos平行板电离室,在4 - 18 MeV范围内计算了两种模体的深度缩放因子c(pl)和与电离室相关的注量校正因子h(pl)。平行板电离室的h(pl)值是根据水或塑料材料组合的电子注量校正因子phi(pl)w以及壁校正因子P(wall,w)和P(wall,pl)来评估的。通过与测量值比较验证了计算得到的k(pl)和h(pl)值。为Farmer型电离室计算的一组k(pl)值,对于光子束中的PW和PWDT,在0.5%范围内等于1。k(pl)值在其合成不确定度范围内也与测量数据一致。对于电子束,在4 - 18 MeV范围内,为PW和PWDT计算的c(pl)值分别为0.998至1.000和0.992至0.997。在4 - 18 MeV的参考深度处,PW和PWDT的phi(pl)w值分别为0.998至1.001和1.004至1.001。平行板电离室水和塑料材料之间的P(wall)差异最大为0.8%。最后,对于塑料材料评估的h(pl)值,对于NACP - 02和Roos电离室,在0.6%范围内等于1。h(pl)值在其合成不确定度范围内也与测量数据一致。在PW和PWDT塑料材料中通过电离室测量得到的水的吸收剂量与水中的吸收剂量相差在1%以内。因此,两种模体都可作为光子和电子剂量测定中替代水的材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验