Suppr超能文献

[使用干燥食品粉末的单盲食物激发试验——第二篇报告。牛奶]

[Single blind food challenge using dried food powder --2nd Report. milk].

作者信息

Komata Takatsugu, Shukuya Akinori, Imai Takanori, Tachimoto Hiroshi, Ebisawa Motohiro

机构信息

Division of Padiatric Allergy, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital.

出版信息

Arerugi. 2009 Jul;58(7):779-89.

Abstract

AIM

We analyzed data obtained from cow's milk challenge with single-blind manner in our department.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We have performed 83 cow's milk challenges in the hospital from 1995 to 2005, and patient profiles and results of the challenges were analyzed.

RESULTS

Positive rate of cow's milk challenges were 44.6% (37/83), and evoked symptoms by cow's milk challenges were most frequently seen in skin, followed by respiratory tract, and gastrointestinal system. Cases of anaphylaxis were seen in 8.1%. Seventy six percentages of symptoms started within one hour after the challenge, and 56.8% among positive cases were medicated. Adrenaline was injected in 9 cases out of 37 positive challenge cases. And all anaphylaxis patients recovered. We performed 19 open challenges with heated-cow's milk among 37 positive cases, and only one negative case existed. When we compared profiles of negative cow's milk challenges and positive ones, significant higher rate on positive skin prick tests (SPT) against cow's milk and complication of bronchial asthma were recognized in positive group. Sensitivity of SPT was 97.3% and specificity was 17.4%. Sensitivity of IgE CAP-RAST was 100% and specificity was 15.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-blinded challenge tests were safe. And they were useful in judgment of the acquisition of oral tolerance in cow's milk allergy. It was only one case that effect of the heating un-matched in food provocation test results. Although we experienced fairly high prevalence of respiratory symptoms during cow's milk challenge tests, appropriate medication especially adrenaline introduction made our test safe enough.

摘要

目的

我们以单盲方式分析了在本科室进行的牛奶激发试验所获得的数据。

对象与方法

1995年至2005年期间,我们在医院进行了83次牛奶激发试验,并对患者资料和激发试验结果进行了分析。

结果

牛奶激发试验的阳性率为44.6%(37/83),牛奶激发试验诱发的症状最常见于皮肤,其次是呼吸道和胃肠道系统。过敏反应病例占8.1%。76%的症状在激发试验后1小时内出现,56.8%的阳性病例接受了药物治疗。37例阳性激发试验病例中有9例注射了肾上腺素。所有过敏反应患者均康复。我们在37例阳性病例中对加热牛奶进行了19次开放激发试验,仅1例为阴性。当我们比较牛奶激发试验阴性和阳性病例的资料时,阳性组中针对牛奶的阳性皮肤点刺试验(SPT)率和支气管哮喘并发症显著更高。SPT的敏感性为97.3%,特异性为17.4%。IgE CAP-RAST的敏感性为100%,特异性为15.2%。

结论

单盲激发试验是安全的。它们有助于判断牛奶过敏患者口服耐受的获得情况。在食物激发试验结果中,加热效果不匹配的情况仅1例。尽管在牛奶激发试验期间我们遇到呼吸道症状的发生率相当高,但适当的药物治疗尤其是肾上腺素的使用使我们的试验足够安全。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验