de Krom M C, Knipschild P G, Kester A D, Spaans F
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lancet. 1990 Feb 17;335(8686):393-5. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90218-t.
The validity of twelve provocative tests for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in a random sample of 504 people from the general population was assessed. 50 woke up at night due to paraesthesiae (with or without numbness or pain) in the fingers innervated by the median nerve (CTS symptoms) in 93 hands. CTS was neurophysiologically confirmed in 28 subjects (44 hands)--a prior probability for CTS of 47%. All clinical diagnostic tests had a low validity. Posterior probability of CTS ranged from 35 to 70% for positive test results and from 41 to 62% for negative test results. A combination of three tests with relatively high validity (paresis of abductor pollicis brevis muscle, hyperpathia, and flick sign) did not significantly change the probability of CTS. Patients with CTS symptoms should be referred directly for neurophysiological examination.
对来自普通人群的504人随机样本进行了12项腕管综合征(CTS)激发试验的有效性评估。93只手中有50只手因正中神经支配手指的感觉异常(伴有或不伴有麻木或疼痛)(CTS症状)而在夜间醒来。28名受试者(44只手)经神经生理学确诊为CTS——CTS的先验概率为47%。所有临床诊断试验的有效性都较低。阳性试验结果的CTS后验概率为35%至70%,阴性试验结果的CTS后验概率为41%至62%。三项有效性相对较高的试验(拇短展肌轻瘫、感觉过敏和轻弹征)联合使用并没有显著改变CTS的概率。有CTS症状的患者应直接转诊进行神经生理学检查。