Suppr超能文献

在离体模型中,比较了混合自攻种植体和圆柱形非自攻种植体在钻取方案方面的初始稳定性。

Primary stability of a hybrid self-tapping implant compared to a cylindrical non-self-tapping implant with respect to drilling protocols in an ex vivo model.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Augustusplatz 2, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Mar;13(1):71-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00185.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modifications of implant design have been intending to improve primary stability. However, little is known about investigation of a hybrid self-tapping implant on primary stability.

PURPOSES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the primary stability of two hybrid self-tapping implants compared to one cylindrical non-self-tapping implant, and to elucidate the relevance of drilling protocols on primary stability in an ex vivo model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two types of hybrid self-tapping implants (Straumann® Bone Level implant [BL], Straumann® Tapered Effect implant [TE]) and one type of cylindrical non-self-tapping implant (Straumann® Standard Plus implant [SP]) were investigated in the study. In porcine iliac cancellous bones, 10 implants each were inserted either using standard drilling or under-dimensioned drilling protocol. The evaluation of implant-bone interface stability was carried out by records of maximum insertion torque, the Periotest® (Siemens, Bensheim, Germany), the resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and the push-out test.

RESULTS

In each drilling group, the maximum insertion torque values of BL and TE were significantly higher than SP (p=.014 and p=.047, respectively). In each group, the Periotest values of TE were significantly lower than SP (p=.036 and p=.033, respectively). The Periotest values of BL and TE were significantly lower in the group of under-dimensioned drilling than standard drilling (p=.002 and p=.02, respectively). In the RFA, no statistical significances were found in implants between two groups and between implants in each group. In each group, the push-out values of BL and TE were significantly higher than SP (p=.006 and p=.049, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid self-tapping implants could achieve a high primary stability which predicts them for use in low-density bone. However, there is still a debate to clarify the influence of under-dimensioned drilling on primary stability.

摘要

背景

为了提高初期稳定性,种植体的设计已进行了多种改良。然而,对于自攻式混合种植体初期稳定性的研究却知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在评估两种自攻式混合种植体(Straumann® Bone Level 种植体[BL]、Straumann® Tapered Effect 种植体[TE])与一种圆柱形非自攻式种植体(Straumann® Standard Plus 种植体[SP])的初期稳定性,并通过体外模型阐明不同钻孔方案对初期稳定性的影响。

材料与方法

在猪髂骨松质骨中,每种类型的种植体各植入 10 个,分别采用标准钻孔或欠尺寸钻孔方案进行植入。采用最大植入扭矩、Periotest®(西门子,德国班海姆)、共振频率分析(RFA)和推出试验记录来评估种植体-骨界面的稳定性。

结果

在每个钻孔组中,BL 和 TE 的最大植入扭矩值均显著高于 SP(p=.014 和 p=.047)。在每组中,TE 的 Periotest 值均显著低于 SP(p=.036 和 p=.033)。欠尺寸钻孔组中 BL 和 TE 的 Periotest 值均显著低于标准钻孔组(p=.002 和 p=.02)。在 RFA 中,两组之间、每组内各种植体之间均未发现统计学差异。在每组中,BL 和 TE 的推出值均显著高于 SP(p=.006 和 p=.049)。

结论

自攻式混合种植体可获得较高的初期稳定性,这预示着它们可用于骨密度较低的区域。然而,关于欠尺寸钻孔对初期稳定性的影响仍存在争议,有待进一步阐明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验