Cawthon Peggy Mannen, Fox Kathleen M, Gandra Shravanthi R, Delmonico Matthew J, Chiou Chiun-Fang, Anthony Mary S, Sewall Ase, Goodpaster Bret, Satterfield Suzanne, Cummings Steven R, Harris Tamara B
Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94107, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1411-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02366.x.
To examine the association between strength, function, lean mass, muscle density, and risk of hospitalization.
Prospective cohort study.
Two U.S. clinical centers.
Adults aged 70 to 80 (N=3,011) from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study.
Measurements were of grip strength, knee extension strength, lean mass, walking speed, and chair stand pace. Thigh computed tomography scans assessed muscle area and density (a proxy for muscle fat infiltration). Hospitalizations were confirmed by local review of medical records. Negative binomial regression models estimated incident rate ratios (IRRs) of hospitalization for race- and sex-specific quartiles of each muscle and function parameter separately. Multivariate models adjusted for age, body mass index, health status, and coexisting medical conditions.
During an average 4.7 years of follow-up, 1,678 (55.7%) participants experienced one or more hospitalizations. Participants in the lowest quartile of muscle density were more likely to be subsequently hospitalized (multivariate IRR=1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.24-1.73) than those in the highest quartile. Similarly, participants with the weakest grip strength were at greater risk of hospitalization (multivariate IRR=1.52, 95% CI=1.30-1.78, Q1 vs. Q4). Comparable results were seen for knee strength, walking pace, and chair stands pace. Lean mass and muscle area were not associated with risk of hospitalization.
Weak strength, poor function, and low muscle density, but not muscle size or lean mass, were associated with greater risk of hospitalization. Interventions to reduce the disease burden associated with sarcopenia should focus on increasing muscle strength and improving physical function rather than simply increasing lean mass.
研究力量、功能、瘦体重、肌肉密度与住院风险之间的关联。
前瞻性队列研究。
美国两个临床中心。
来自健康、衰老与身体成分研究的70至80岁成年人(N = 3,011)。
测量握力、膝关节伸展力量、瘦体重、步行速度和从椅子上站起的速度。大腿计算机断层扫描评估肌肉面积和密度(肌肉脂肪浸润的替代指标)。通过当地病历审查确认住院情况。负二项回归模型分别估计每个肌肉和功能参数按种族和性别划分的四分位数的住院发病率比(IRR)。多变量模型对年龄、体重指数、健康状况和并存的医疗状况进行了调整。
在平均4.7年的随访期间,1,678名(55.7%)参与者经历了一次或多次住院。肌肉密度处于最低四分位数的参与者比最高四分位数的参与者随后住院的可能性更大(多变量IRR = 1.47,95%置信区间(CI)= 1.24 - 1.73)。同样,握力最弱的参与者住院风险更高(多变量IRR = 1.52,95% CI = 1.30 - 1.78,第一四分位数与第四四分位数相比)。膝关节力量、步行速度和从椅子上站起的速度也有类似结果。瘦体重和肌肉面积与住院风险无关。
力量弱、功能差和肌肉密度低,但不是肌肉大小或瘦体重,与更高的住院风险相关。减少与肌肉减少症相关疾病负担的干预措施应侧重于增加肌肉力量和改善身体功能,而不是简单地增加瘦体重。