Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Munich University Hospital, Marchioninistrasse 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
J Crit Care. 2010 Sep;25(3):413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Deciding about the limitation of life-sustaining treatment (LST) is a major challenge for intensive care medicine. The aim of the study was to investigate the practices and perspectives of German intensive care nurses and physicians on limiting LST.
We conducted an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire survey among the 268 nurses and 95 physicians on all 10 intensive care units of the Munich University Hospital, Germany.
The response rate was 53%. Of all respondents, 91% reported being confronted with the topic at least once a month. Although all reported limiting cardiopulmonary resuscitation, almost no one reported limiting artificial hydration. Half of nurses and junior physicians felt uncertain about the decision-making process. Junior physicians were most dissatisfied with their training for this task and expressed the highest fear of litigation. Nurses were less satisfied than physicians with the communication process. Both nurses and relatives were not routinely involved in decision making. There is no standardized documentation practice, and many notes are not readily accessible to nurses.
Limiting LST is common in German intensive care units. The major shortcomings are team communication, communication with the patient's family, and documentation of the decision-making process.
决定是否限制生命支持治疗(LST)是重症监护医学面临的主要挑战。本研究旨在调查德国重症监护护士和医师在限制 LST 方面的实践和观点。
我们对德国慕尼黑大学医院的 10 个重症监护病房的 268 名护士和 95 名医生进行了匿名、自我管理的问卷调查。
回复率为 53%。所有受访者中,91%报告称每月至少会遇到一次该主题。尽管所有受访者都报告限制心肺复苏术,但几乎没有人报告限制人工水合作用。一半的护士和初级医师对决策过程感到不确定。初级医师对这一任务的培训最不满意,并表示最担心诉讼。护士对沟通过程的满意度低于医师。护士和家属均未常规参与决策制定。没有标准化的文件记录实践,许多记录对护士来说不易获取。
限制 LST 在德国重症监护病房中很常见。主要的缺点是团队沟通、与患者家属的沟通以及决策过程的记录。