• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后的糖尿病患者与β受体阻滞剂

Diabetic patients and beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Kjekshus J, Gilpin E, Cali G, Blackey A R, Henning H, Ross J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego Medical Center, Veterans Administration Hospital.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 1990 Jan;11(1):43-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059591.

DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059591
PMID:1968386
Abstract

Whether diabetic patients may benefit, compared with non-diabetic patients, from beta-blocker therapy following acute myocardial infarction was examined in a large multicentre cohort of 2024 patients, including 340 diabetics, 281 of whom survived hospitalization. One-year mortality following discharge was 17% for diabetics compared with 10% for non-diabetics (P less than 0.001). However, diabetics discharged on beta-blockers had a 1-year mortality of only 10%, compared with 23% for diabetics not on beta-blockers. In non-diabetics, mortality rates were 7% and 13% for those taking and not taking beta-blockers, respectively. Bias in patient selection for beta-blocker therapy might be responsible for the trends exhibited in our population since patients were not randomized to treatment. In diabetics, evidence of pulmonary congestion on X-ray was more prevalent than in non-diabetics; this appeared to be true both for patients taking beta-blockers and for those not taking beta-blockers. However, even in diabetics without evidence of pulmonary congestion on X-ray, 1-year mortality was 7% vs 17% for those with and without beta-blocker therapy, respectively (P less than 0.04). In multivariate analysis, beta-blocker use was an independent predictor of 1-year cardiac survival following hospital discharge for all diabetics, even those without evidence for pulmonary congestion on X-ray, but not for non-diabetics. These data suggest a beneficial effect, but a definitive answer regarding the benefit of beta-blockade in diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction would require a prospective, randomized study.

摘要

在一个由2024名患者组成的大型多中心队列中,研究了糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者相比,在急性心肌梗死后接受β受体阻滞剂治疗是否有益。该队列包括340名糖尿病患者,其中281名存活至出院。糖尿病患者出院后的一年死亡率为17%,而非糖尿病患者为10%(P<0.001)。然而,出院时服用β受体阻滞剂的糖尿病患者一年死亡率仅为10%,未服用β受体阻滞剂的糖尿病患者为23%。在非糖尿病患者中,服用和未服用β受体阻滞剂的死亡率分别为7%和13%。由于患者未被随机分配接受治疗,β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者选择偏差可能是导致我们研究人群中出现这种趋势的原因。在糖尿病患者中,X线显示肺充血的证据比非糖尿病患者更普遍;这在服用和未服用β受体阻滞剂的患者中似乎都是如此。然而,即使在X线无肺充血证据的糖尿病患者中,接受和未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者一年死亡率分别为7%和17%(P<0.04)。多变量分析显示,对于所有糖尿病患者,即使是那些X线无肺充血证据的患者,出院后使用β受体阻滞剂也是一年心脏存活的独立预测因素,但对非糖尿病患者则不是。这些数据表明有有益作用,但关于急性心肌梗死后糖尿病患者使用β受体阻滞剂的益处的确切答案需要进行前瞻性随机研究。

相似文献

1
Diabetic patients and beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后的糖尿病患者与β受体阻滞剂
Eur Heart J. 1990 Jan;11(1):43-50. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059591.
2
Beta-blocker therapy for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction in elderly diabetic patients. Results from the National Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.老年糖尿病患者心肌梗死二级预防的β受体阻滞剂治疗。国家心血管合作项目的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Nov 1;34(5):1388-94. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00383-6.
3
Adverse outcomes of underuse of beta-blockers in elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction.老年急性心肌梗死幸存者β受体阻滞剂使用不足的不良后果。
JAMA. 1997 Jan 8;277(2):115-21.
4
β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study.β受体阻滞剂与无心力衰竭心肌梗死患者的死亡率:多中心前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2016 Sep 20;354:i4801. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4801.
5
Usefulness of beta blockers in high-risk patients after myocardial infarction in conjunction with captopril and/or valsartan (from the VALsartan In Acute Myocardial Infarction [VALIANT] trial).心肌梗死后高危患者中β受体阻滞剂联合卡托普利和/或缬沙坦的有效性(来自缬沙坦治疗急性心肌梗死[VALIANT]试验)
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 15;104(2):151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 Jun 3.
6
Effects of propranolol on recovery of heart rate variability following acute myocardial infarction and relation to outcome in the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial.普萘洛尔对急性心肌梗死后心率变异性恢复的影响及其与β受体阻滞剂心肌梗死试验结果的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2003 Jan 15;91(2):137-42. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)03098-9.
7
Changes in rates of beta-blocker use between 1994 and 1997 among elderly survivors of acute myocardial infarction.1994年至1997年间急性心肌梗死老年幸存者中β受体阻滞剂使用率的变化。
Am Heart J. 2000 Oct;140(4):663-71. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.109650.
8
Comparative effects of three beta blockers (atenolol, metoprolol, and propranolol) on survival after acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Apr 1;87(7):823-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01520-4.
9
Differential Effect of β-Blockers According to Heart Rate in Acute Myocardial Infarction Without Heart Failure or Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Cohort Study.β受体阻滞剂在无心力衰竭或左心室收缩功能障碍的急性心肌梗死患者中根据心率的差异作用:一项队列研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Dec;94(12):2476-2487. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.05.033.
10
Benefits of non-selective versus cardioselective beta-blockers in acute myocardial infarction in hypertensive patients.非选择性与心脏选择性β受体阻滞剂在高血压患者急性心肌梗死中的益处。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1993 Jun;11(4):S55-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of β-blockers on all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes and coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.β受体阻滞剂对糖尿病合并冠心病患者全因死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Jan 27;11:1076107. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1076107. eCollection 2023.
2
Blood pressure management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者的血压管理。
Hypertens Res. 2017 Aug;40(8):721-729. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.55. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
The Real Role of β-Blockers in Daily Cardiovascular Therapy.
β受体阻滞剂在日常心血管治疗中的真正作用。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2017 Oct;17(5):361-373. doi: 10.1007/s40256-017-0221-8.
4
THE IMPACT OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL: A REVIEW.心血管药物对血糖控制的影响:综述
Endocr Pract. 2017 Mar;23(3):363-371. doi: 10.4158/EP161309.RA. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
5
Do angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors represent a progress in hypertension care in diabetes mellitus?血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂是否代表糖尿病高血压治疗的一项进展?
Diabetologia. 1991 Feb;34(2):137-138. doi: 10.1007/BF00500388.
6
Effectiveness of Prior Use of Beta-Blockers for Preventing Adverse Influences of Severe Hypoglycemia in Patients With Diabetes: An Observational Study.β受体阻滞剂预先使用对预防糖尿病患者严重低血糖不良影响的有效性:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Sep;94(39):e1629. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001629.
7
Outcome of patients with high-risk Duke treadmill score and normal myocardial perfusion imaging on spect.杜克运动平板评分高危且单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像正常患者的结局
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Dec;23(6):1291-1300. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0156-x. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
Type of β-blocker use among patients with versus without diabetes after myocardial infarction.心梗后伴或不伴糖尿病患者β受体阻滞剂的使用类型。
Am Heart J. 2014 Sep;168(3):273-279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
9
Beta-blockers use in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and concomitant cardiovascular conditions.β受体阻滞剂在慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并心血管疾病患者中的应用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007;2(4):535-40.
10
Cardioselective beta-blockers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病的心脏选择性β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003566.pub2.