• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻关系中的期望变化:性别差异及其对沟通的影响。

Desired change in couples: gender differences and effects on communication.

作者信息

Heyman Richard E, Hunt-Martorano Ashley N, Malik Jill, Slep Amy M Smith

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Psychol. 2009 Aug;23(4):474-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015980.

DOI:10.1037/a0015980
PMID:19685983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2778212/
Abstract

Using a sample (N = 453) drawn from a representative sampling frame of couples who are married or living together and have a 3 to 7 year-old child, this study investigates (a) the amount and specific areas of change desired by men and women, (b) the relation between relationship adjustment and desired change; and (c) the ways in which partners negotiate change. On the Areas of Change Questionnaire, women compared with men, wanted greater increases in their partners' emotional and companionate behaviors, instrumental support, and parenting involvement; men wanted greater increases in sex. Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (Kenny, 1996), both men's and women's relationship adjustment predicted desired change (i.e., actor effects), over and above the effects of their partners' adjustment (i.e., partner effects); partner effects were not significant. Each couple was also observed discussing the man's and the woman's top desired change area. Both men and women behaved more positively during the partner-initiated conversations than during their own-initiated conversations. Women, compared with men, were more negative in their own and in their partners' conversations.

摘要

本研究使用一个样本(N = 453),该样本取自具有代表性的抽样框架,样本中的夫妻已婚或同居,且育有一名3至7岁的孩子。本研究调查了:(a)男性和女性期望改变的程度及具体领域;(b)关系调适与期望改变之间的关系;以及(c)伴侣协商改变的方式。在“改变领域问卷”中,与男性相比,女性希望伴侣在情感和陪伴行为、工具性支持以及育儿参与方面有更大程度的增加;男性则希望在性行为方面有更大程度的增加。使用“行动者-伙伴相互依赖模型”(肯尼,1996),男性和女性的关系调适都预测了期望的改变(即行动者效应),超出了其伴侣调适的影响(即伙伴效应);伙伴效应不显著。研究还观察了每对夫妻讨论男性和女性最期望改变的领域的情况。在由伴侣发起的对话中,男性和女性的表现都比在自己发起的对话中更积极。与男性相比,女性在自己发起的对话和伴侣发起的对话中都更消极。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/c47ba82c8461/nihms152794f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/2b105989ae7e/nihms152794f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/ca86458d4738/nihms152794f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/c47ba82c8461/nihms152794f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/2b105989ae7e/nihms152794f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/ca86458d4738/nihms152794f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86d4/2778212/c47ba82c8461/nihms152794f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Desired change in couples: gender differences and effects on communication.夫妻关系中的期望变化:性别差异及其对沟通的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Aug;23(4):474-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015980.
2
The heterogeneity of intimate partner violence and its associations with distressed couples' emotional communication.亲密伴侣暴力的异质性及其与苦恼夫妻情感沟通的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Oct;38(7):1051-1062. doi: 10.1037/fam0001242. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Dyadic dynamics of perceived social support in couples facing infertility.不孕夫妇感知社会支持的对偶动态。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jan;29(1):83-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det403. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
Cortisol slopes and conflict: A spouse's perceived stress matters.皮质醇斜率与冲突:配偶感知到的压力很重要。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020 Nov;121:104839. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2020.104839. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
5
The role of emotion regulation in couples' stress communication and dyadic coping responses.情绪调节在夫妻压力沟通和应对反应中的作用。
Stress Health. 2023 Apr;39(2):309-322. doi: 10.1002/smi.3186. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
6
Power and the association with relationship quality in South African couples: Implications for HIV/AIDS interventions.南非夫妻中的权力及其与关系质量的关联:对艾滋病毒/艾滋病干预措施的启示
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;153:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.035. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Longitudinal effects of conflict behaviors on depressive symptoms in young couples.冲突行为对年轻夫妻抑郁症状的纵向影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Aug;23(4):596-605. doi: 10.1037/a0015893.
8
Concurrent and Prospective Associations Between Communicated Emotional Arousal and Adjustment Among Couples Coping With Cancer.夫妻共同应对癌症过程中沟通的情绪唤起与适应的并发和前瞻性关联。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Aug 21;57(9):753-764. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad017.
9
Whose fault is it? Blame predicting psychological adjustment and couple satisfaction in couples seeking fertility treatment.是谁的错?在寻求生育治疗的夫妇中,责备预测心理调整和夫妻满意度。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Mar;39(1):64-72. doi: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1289369. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Partner Responses to Low Desire: Associations With Sexual, Relational, and Psychological Well-Being Among Couples Coping With Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder.伴侣对低性欲的反应:与性、关系和心理幸福感的关联,在应对女性性兴趣/唤起障碍的夫妇中。
J Sex Med. 2020 Nov;17(11):2168-2180. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Couple Conflict Behavior: Disentangling Associations With Relationship Dissatisfaction and Intimate Partner Violence.夫妻冲突行为:理清与关系不满和亲密伴侣暴力的关联
J Fam Issues. 2023 Nov;44(11):2997-3016. doi: 10.1177/0192513x221123787. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
2
Couples' communication quality differs by topic.夫妻沟通质量因话题而异。
J Fam Psychol. 2023 Sep;37(6):909-919. doi: 10.1037/fam0001111. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Time Spent Together in Intimate Relationships: Implications for Relationship Functioning.亲密关系中共同相处的时间:对关系功能的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Problem-solving skills and affective expressions as predictors of change in marital satisfaction.作为婚姻满意度变化预测因素的解决问题能力和情感表达
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Feb;73(1):15-27. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.1.15.
2
The observation of specific affect in marital interactions: psychometric properties of a coding system and a rating system.婚姻互动中特定情感的观察:一种编码系统和一种评分系统的心理测量特性。
Psychol Assess. 2002 Dec;14(4):423-38. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.14.4.423.
3
Observation of couple conflicts: clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations.
Contemp Fam Ther. 2021 Sep;43(3):226-233. doi: 10.1007/s10591-020-09562-6. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience.需求/撤回行为的人际过程模型的复制和扩展:纳入主观情感体验。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Jun;35(4):534-545. doi: 10.1037/fam0000802. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Emotional flooding in response to negative affect in couple conflicts: Individual differences and correlates.负面情绪在夫妻冲突中引发的情绪淹没:个体差异及其关联。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Mar;34(2):145-154. doi: 10.1037/fam0000584. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
Sex Differences in Associations of Hostile and Non-hostile Criticism with Relationship Quality.敌意批评与非敌意批评与关系质量关联中的性别差异
J Psychol. 2017 May 19;151(4):416-430. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1305324. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Short-Term Change in Couples' Conflict Following a Transition to Parenthood Intervention.为人父母干预过渡后夫妻冲突的短期变化。
Couple Family Psychol. 2015 Dec;4(4):239-251. doi: 10.1037/cfp0000051.
8
Effects of administered alcohol on intimate partner interactions in a conflict resolution paradigm.在冲突解决范式中,摄入酒精对亲密伴侣互动的影响。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Mar;75(2):249-58. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2014.75.249.
9
The language of demand/withdraw: verbal and vocal expression in dyadic interactions.需求/撤回的语言:对偶互动中的言语和声音表达。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):570-80. doi: 10.1037/a0024064.
10
Conflict Resolution in Mexican-Origin Couples: Culture, Gender, and Marital Quality.墨西哥裔夫妇的冲突解决:文化、性别与婚姻质量
J Marriage Fam. 2010 Aug;72(4):991-1005. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00744.x.
夫妻冲突观察:临床评估应用、顽固的真相与薄弱的基础
Psychol Assess. 2001 Mar;13(1):5-35. doi: 10.1037//1040-3590.13.1.5.
4
Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition.是否存在“他的”和“她的”类型的相互依赖?集体与关系相互依赖中的性别差异对情感、行为和认知的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Sep;77(3):642-55. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.3.642.
5
Who's got the power? Gender differences in partners' perceptions of influence during marital problem-solving discussions.谁拥有权力?婚姻问题解决讨论中伴侣影响力认知的性别差异。
Fam Process. 1995 Sep;34(3):303-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1995.00303.x.
6
Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension.婚姻互动中的性别与冲突结构:一项重复与扩展研究
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;61(1):16-27. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.16.
7
Marital interaction coding system: revision and empirical evaluation.婚姻互动编码系统:修订与实证评估。
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Jul;33(6):737-46. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00003-g.
8
Recipient's mood, relationship type, and helping.接受者的情绪、关系类型与帮助行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):94-103. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.94.
9
Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.婚姻冲突中需求/退缩模式下的性别与社会结构
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):73-81. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.73.
10
Measuring daily events and experiences: decisions for the researcher.
J Pers. 1991 Sep;59(3):575-607. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00260.x.