需求/撤回的语言：对偶互动中的言语和声音表达。
The language of demand/withdraw: verbal and vocal expression in dyadic interactions.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90080, USA.
出版信息
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):570-80. doi: 10.1037/a0024064.
Abstract
Associations between vocally expressed emotional arousal, influence tactics, and demand/withdraw behavior were examined in a treatment-seeking sample of 130 seriously and stably distressed, married, heterosexual couples and in a community sample (N = 38) of 18 married heterosexual and 20 dating heterosexual couples. Fundamental frequency was used to measure emotional arousal, and computational linguistics were used to measure influence tactics. Higher levels of demand/withdraw behavior were associated with greater use of manipulative and controlling influence tactics, higher levels of emotional arousal, and less frequent use of cooperative and compromising influence tactics. Overall, demanders tended to express more arousal and to use more influence tactics than withdrawers. Both influence tactics and emotional arousal were uniquely associated with demand/withdraw behavior. Implications of results are discussed for refining theories of demand/withdraw interaction.
摘要
在一个寻求治疗的 130 对严重和稳定困扰的已婚异性恋夫妇样本和一个社区样本（N=38）中，研究了口头表达的情绪唤醒、影响策略和需求/回避行为之间的关联，该社区样本包括 18 对已婚异性恋夫妇和 20 对约会中的异性恋夫妇。基频用于测量情绪唤醒，计算语言学用于测量影响策略。较高水平的需求/回避行为与更频繁地使用操纵和控制影响策略、更高水平的情绪唤醒以及较少使用合作和妥协影响策略相关。总体而言，要求者往往比回避者表达更多的唤醒和使用更多的影响策略。影响策略和情绪唤醒都与需求/回避行为有独特的关联。对结果的讨论对于完善需求/回避互动的理论具有启示意义。
相似文献
1
The language of demand/withdraw: verbal and vocal expression in dyadic interactions.需求/撤回的语言：对偶互动中的言语和声音表达。
J Fam Psychol. 2011 Aug;25(4):570-80. doi: 10.1037/a0024064.
2
The interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior.需求/退缩行为的人际过程模型。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Feb;29(1):80-90. doi: 10.1037/fam0000044. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
3
Demand-withdraw communication in severely distressed, moderately distressed, and nondistressed couples: rigidity and polarity during relationship and personal problem discussions.重度困扰、中度困扰和无困扰夫妻中的要求-退缩沟通：关系及个人问题讨论中的僵化与两极化
J Fam Psychol. 2007 Jun;21(2):218-26. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.218.
4
When the "U" is not Inverted: Trajectories of Expressed Emotional Arousal Predict Relationship Satisfaction.“U”不倒置：表达的情绪唤醒轨迹预测关系满意度。
Fam Process. 2019 Jun;58(2):463-477. doi: 10.1111/famp.12406. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
5
Older spouses' cortisol responses to marital conflict: associations with demand/withdraw communication patterns.老年配偶对婚姻冲突的皮质醇反应：与要求/退缩沟通模式的关联。
J Behav Med. 2006 Aug;29(4):317-25. doi: 10.1007/s10865-006-9058-3. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
6
Greater emotional arousal predicts poorer long-term memory of communication skills in couples.情绪唤醒度越高，夫妻双方对沟通技巧的长期记忆越差。
Behav Res Ther. 2012 Jun;50(6):442-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Marital negativity's festering wounds: The emotional, immunological, and relational toll of couples' negative communication patterns.婚姻负面性的溃烂伤口：夫妻负面沟通模式对情感、免疫和关系的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023 Mar;149:105989. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105989. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
8
Associations among PTSD symptoms, fear of emotion, and couple communication difficulties: A between-person dyadic analysis.创伤后应激障碍症状、情绪恐惧与夫妻沟通困难之间的关联：一项个体间二元分析。
Behav Res Ther. 2025 Jan;184:104666. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2024.104666. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
9
Exploring the basis for gender differences in the demand-withdraw pattern.探索需求-撤回模式中性别差异的基础。
J Homosex. 2010;57(5):666-84. doi: 10.1080/00918361003712145.
10
A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience.需求/撤回行为的人际过程模型的复制和扩展：纳入主观情感体验。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Jun;35(4):534-545. doi: 10.1037/fam0000802. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
引用本文的文献
1
Empathy is associated with older adults' social behaviors and verbal emotional expressions throughout the day.同理心与老年人一整天的社交行为和言语情感表达相关。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82550-0.
2
Associations Between Vocal Arousal and Dyadic Coping During Couple Interactions After a Stress Induction.压力诱导后夫妻互动过程中声音唤醒与二元应对之间的关联。
Int J Appl Posit Psychol. 2023;8(Suppl 2):187-204. doi: 10.1007/s41042-023-00087-5. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Marital negativity's festering wounds: The emotional, immunological, and relational toll of couples' negative communication patterns.婚姻负面性的溃烂伤口：夫妻负面沟通模式对情感、免疫和关系的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023 Mar;149:105989. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105989. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
A replication and extension of the interpersonal process model of demand/withdraw behavior: Incorporating subjective emotional experience.需求/撤回行为的人际过程模型的复制和扩展：纳入主观情感体验。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Jun;35(4):534-545. doi: 10.1037/fam0000802. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Depression, anxiety, fear of progression, and emotional arousal in couples after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入后夫妻双方的抑郁、焦虑、进展恐惧和情绪激动。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;7(5):3022-3028. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12927. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
Intimate Partner Violence and Couple Conflict Behaviors: The Moderating Effect of Drug Use Problem Severity.亲密伴侣暴力和夫妻冲突行为：药物使用问题严重程度的调节作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):NP1170-NP1196. doi: 10.1177/0886260520922369. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
Cognitive-Emotional Involvement During Mirror Exposure Is Not Accompanied by Physiological Activation in Binge Eating Disorder.在暴饮暴食症中，镜像暴露期间的认知-情感参与并未伴随生理激活。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 19;10:745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00745. eCollection 2019.
8
The Promise and the Challenge of Technology-Facilitated Methods for Assessing Behavioral and Cognitive Markers of Risk for Suicide among U.S. Army National Guard Personnel.技术辅助方法在美国陆军国民警卫队人员自杀风险行为和认知标志物评估中的前景与挑战
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 31;14(4):361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14040361.
9
Disorder-specific patterns of emotion coregulation in couples: Comparing obsessive compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa.夫妻中特定障碍的情绪共同调节模式：强迫症与神经性厌食症的比较。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Apr;31(3):304-315. doi: 10.1037/fam0000251. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
10
Behaviorally-based couple therapies reduce emotional arousal during couple conflict.基于行为的夫妻治疗可减少夫妻冲突期间的情绪唤起。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Sep;72:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
本文引用的文献
1
Gender, topic, and time in observed demand-withdraw interaction in cross- and same-sex couples.观察到的异性恋和同性恋伴侣中需求-回避互动中的性别、话题和时间。
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Jun;24(3):233-42. doi: 10.1037/a0019717.
2
Antecedents and consequences of demand/withdraw.需求/撤回的前因后果。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Oct;23(5):749-57. doi: 10.1037/a0016185.
3
Desired change in couples: gender differences and effects on communication.夫妻关系中的期望变化：性别差异及其对沟通的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Aug;23(4):474-84. doi: 10.1037/a0015980.
4
Prediction of response to treatment in a randomized clinical trial of couple therapy: a 2-year follow-up.夫妻治疗随机临床试验中治疗反应的预测：一项为期两年的随访研究。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):160-73. doi: 10.1037/a0014405.
5
Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples.传统行为夫妻治疗与综合行为夫妻治疗对严重且长期困扰的已婚夫妇的疗效对比
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Apr;72(2):176-91. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.176.
6
Love, marriage, and divorce: newlyweds' stress hormones foreshadow relationship changes.爱情、婚姻与离婚：新婚夫妇的应激激素预示着关系的变化。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Feb;71(1):176-88. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.71.1.176.
7
Marriage and health: his and hers.婚姻与健康：他与她的情况
Psychol Bull. 2001 Jul;127(4):472-503. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472.
8
Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension.婚姻互动中的性别与冲突结构：一项重复与扩展研究
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993 Feb;61(1):16-27. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.61.1.16.
9
Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict.婚姻冲突中需求/退缩模式下的性别与社会结构
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Jul;59(1):73-81. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.1.73.
Zotero 插件