• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Introducing quality improvement methods into local public health departments: structured evaluation of a statewide pilot project.将质量改进方法引入地方公共卫生部门:对一个全州范围试点项目的结构化评估
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1863-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01012.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
2
Early evaluation results from a statewide quality improvement training program for local public health departments in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州全州范围内针对地方公共卫生部门的质量改进培训计划的早期评估结果。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):43-51. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31822d2e07.
3
Advancing Quality Improvement in Public Health Departments Through a Statewide Training Program.通过一项全州范围的培训计划提升公共卫生部门的质量改进水平。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):E21-7. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000165.
4
Effectiveness of public health quality improvement training approaches: application, application, application.公共卫生质量改进培训方法的有效性:应用、应用、应用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):E1-7. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182249505.
5
Quality improvement coaching to build capacity within health departments: reflections and recommendations.通过质量改进指导提升卫生部门能力:反思与建议
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):52-6. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182aa653a.
6
Developing a taxonomy for the science of improvement in public health.制定公共卫生改善科学的分类法。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 Nov;18(6):506-14. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825fbb12.
7
Quality improvement education incorporated as an integral part of critical care fellows training at the Mayo Clinic.质量改进教育作为梅奥诊所重症医学专科培训学员培训的一个组成部分。
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1362-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000398.
8
A two-pronged quality improvement training program for leaders and frontline staff.针对领导者和一线员工的双管齐下的质量改进培训计划。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Apr;37(4):147-53. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37018-3.
9
Quality Improvement and Performance Management Benefits of Public Health Accreditation: National Evaluation Findings.公共卫生认证的质量改进和绩效管理效益:国家评估结果。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 May/Jun;24 Suppl 3:S3-S9. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000692.
10
Improving Culture, One Quality Improvement Project at a Time.一次一个质量改进项目,改善文化。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Jan/Feb;24(1):57-62. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000554.

引用本文的文献

1
Rugged landscapes: complexity and implementation science.崎岖的地形:复杂性与实施科学。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 29;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01028-5.
2
Evolving quality improvement support strategies to improve Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle fidelity: a retrospective mixed-methods study.不断发展的质量改进支持策略,以提高计划-实施-研究-行动循环的保真度:一项回顾性混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 May;28(5):356-365. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007605. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.评估质量改进能力建设的投资:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e012431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012431.
4
Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: a framework for public health.定义和评估质量改进成果:一个公共卫生框架
Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S167-73. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302533. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
5
Primary care staff perspectives on a virtual learning collaborative to support medical home implementation.基层医疗人员对支持医疗之家实施的虚拟学习协作的看法。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S579-88. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2668-x.
6
Diabetes education: quality improvement interventions through health departments.糖尿病教育:通过卫生部门进行质量改进干预。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.08.007.
7
Influenza sentinel surveillance network: a public health-primary care collaborative action to assess influenza A(H1N1)pmd09 in Catalonia, Spain.流感哨点监测网络:西班牙加泰罗尼亚评估甲型H1N1流感大流行2009的一项公共卫生-初级保健协作行动。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Mar;9(3):671-4. doi: 10.4161/hv.23264. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Using a NIATx based local learning collaborative for performance improvement.利用基于NIATx的本地学习协作来提高绩效。
Eval Program Plann. 2011 Nov;34(4):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
9
Applying health services research to public health practice: an emerging priority.将卫生服务研究应用于公共卫生实践:一项新的优先事项。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1775-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01007.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence for the impact of quality improvement collaboratives: systematic review.质量改进协作影响的证据:系统评价
BMJ. 2008 Jun 28;336(7659):1491-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39570.749884.BE. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
2
Bridging health research and policy: effective dissemination strategies.搭建健康研究与政策之间的桥梁:有效的传播策略。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):150-4. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000311893.80701.7a.
3
Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model.医疗保健系统的转型变革:一种组织模式。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2007 Oct-Dec;32(4):309-20. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000296785.29718.5d.
4
Public health services and systems research.公共卫生服务与系统研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Aug;33(2):169-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.03.013.
5
The role of performance management and quality improvement in a national voluntary public health accreditation system.绩效管理与质量改进在国家自愿性公共卫生认证体系中的作用。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):427-9. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000278039.46518.45.
6
Final recommendations for a voluntary national accreditation program for state and local health departments: steering committee report.州和地方卫生部门自愿性国家认证计划的最终建议:指导委员会报告
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Jul-Aug;13(4):342-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000278026.49196.40.
7
Quality improvement in public health emergency preparedness.公共卫生应急准备中的质量改进。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:19-31. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.082206.094104.
8
Promoting evidence-based management.促进循证管理。
Front Health Serv Manage. 2006 Spring;22(3):23-9; discussion 41-4.
9
Public health systems research: setting a national agenda.公共卫生系统研究:制定国家议程。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):410-3. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046037. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
10
A research agenda for public health workforce development.公共卫生人力发展研究议程。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004 May-Jun;10(3):186-92. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200405000-00002.

将质量改进方法引入地方公共卫生部门:对一个全州范围试点项目的结构化评估

Introducing quality improvement methods into local public health departments: structured evaluation of a statewide pilot project.

作者信息

Riley William, Parsons Helen, McCoy Kim, Burns Debra, Anderson Donna, Lee Suhna, Sainfort François

机构信息

University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1863-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01012.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01012.x
PMID:19686251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2758410/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility and assess the preliminary impact of a unique statewide quality improvement (QI) training program designed for public health departments.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: One hundred and ninety-five public health employees/managers from 38 local health departments throughout Minnesota were selected to participate in a newly developed QI training program and 65 of those engaged in and completed eight expert-supported QI projects over a period of 10 months from June 2007 through March 2008.

STUDY DESIGN

As part of the Minnesota Quality Improvement Initiative, a structured distance education QI training program was designed and deployed in a first large-scale pilot. To evaluate the preliminary impact of the program, a mixed-method evaluation design was used based on four dimensions: learner reaction, knowledge, intention to apply, and preliminary outcomes.

DATA

Subjective ratings of three dimensions of training quality were collected from participants after each of the scheduled learning sessions. Pre- and post-QI project surveys were administered to collect participant reactions, knowledge, future intention to apply learning, and perceived outcomes. Monthly and final QI project reports were collected to further inform success and preliminary outcomes of the projects.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The participants reported (1) high levels of satisfaction with the training sessions, (2) increased perception of the relevance of the QI techniques, (3) increased perceived knowledge of all specific QI methods and techniques, (4) increased confidence in applying QI techniques on future projects, (5) increased intention to apply techniques on future QI projects, and (6) high perceived success of, and satisfaction with, the projects. Finally, preliminary outcomes data show moderate to large improvements in quality and/or efficiency for six out of eight projects.

CONCLUSIONS

QI methods and techniques can be successfully implemented in local public health agencies on a statewide basis using the collaborative model through distance training and expert facilitation. This unique training can improve both core and support processes and lead to favorable staff reactions, increased knowledge, and improved health outcomes. The program can be further improved and deployed and holds great promise to facilitate the successful dissemination of proven QI methods throughout local public health departments.

摘要

目的

测试一项为公共卫生部门设计的独特的全州质量改进(QI)培训项目的可行性,并评估其初步影响。

数据来源/研究背景:从明尼苏达州38个地方卫生部门的195名公共卫生员工/管理人员中挑选人员参与一项新开发的QI培训项目,其中65人在2007年6月至2008年3月的10个月期间参与并完成了8个由专家支持的QI项目。

研究设计

作为明尼苏达质量改进计划的一部分,设计并首次大规模试点部署了一个结构化远程教育QI培训项目。为评估该项目的初步影响,采用了基于四个维度的混合方法评估设计:学习者反应、知识、应用意图和初步成果。

数据

在每次预定学习课程结束后,从参与者那里收集对培训质量三个维度的主观评分。实施QI项目前后的调查,以收集参与者的反应、知识、未来应用所学知识的意图以及感知到的成果。收集月度和最终的QI项目报告,以进一步了解项目的成功情况和初步成果。

主要发现

参与者报告称:(1)对培训课程高度满意;(2)对QI技术相关性的认知增加;(3)对所有特定QI方法和技术的感知知识增加;(4)对在未来项目中应用QI技术的信心增强;(五)在未来QI项目中应用技术的意图增加;(6)对项目的高度感知成功和满意度。最后,初步成果数据显示,八个项目中有六个在质量和/或效率方面有中度到大幅的改善。

结论

QI方法和技术可以通过远程培训和专家指导,利用协作模式在全州范围内的地方公共卫生机构中成功实施。这种独特的培训可以改善核心流程和支持流程,并带来员工的积极反应、知识增加和健康成果改善。该项目可以进一步改进和推广,有望促进经过验证的QI方法在地方公共卫生部门的成功传播。