Riley William, Parsons Helen, McCoy Kim, Burns Debra, Anderson Donna, Lee Suhna, Sainfort François
University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1863-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01012.x. Epub 2009 Aug 17.
To test the feasibility and assess the preliminary impact of a unique statewide quality improvement (QI) training program designed for public health departments.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: One hundred and ninety-five public health employees/managers from 38 local health departments throughout Minnesota were selected to participate in a newly developed QI training program and 65 of those engaged in and completed eight expert-supported QI projects over a period of 10 months from June 2007 through March 2008.
As part of the Minnesota Quality Improvement Initiative, a structured distance education QI training program was designed and deployed in a first large-scale pilot. To evaluate the preliminary impact of the program, a mixed-method evaluation design was used based on four dimensions: learner reaction, knowledge, intention to apply, and preliminary outcomes.
Subjective ratings of three dimensions of training quality were collected from participants after each of the scheduled learning sessions. Pre- and post-QI project surveys were administered to collect participant reactions, knowledge, future intention to apply learning, and perceived outcomes. Monthly and final QI project reports were collected to further inform success and preliminary outcomes of the projects.
The participants reported (1) high levels of satisfaction with the training sessions, (2) increased perception of the relevance of the QI techniques, (3) increased perceived knowledge of all specific QI methods and techniques, (4) increased confidence in applying QI techniques on future projects, (5) increased intention to apply techniques on future QI projects, and (6) high perceived success of, and satisfaction with, the projects. Finally, preliminary outcomes data show moderate to large improvements in quality and/or efficiency for six out of eight projects.
QI methods and techniques can be successfully implemented in local public health agencies on a statewide basis using the collaborative model through distance training and expert facilitation. This unique training can improve both core and support processes and lead to favorable staff reactions, increased knowledge, and improved health outcomes. The program can be further improved and deployed and holds great promise to facilitate the successful dissemination of proven QI methods throughout local public health departments.
测试一项为公共卫生部门设计的独特的全州质量改进(QI)培训项目的可行性,并评估其初步影响。
数据来源/研究背景:从明尼苏达州38个地方卫生部门的195名公共卫生员工/管理人员中挑选人员参与一项新开发的QI培训项目,其中65人在2007年6月至2008年3月的10个月期间参与并完成了8个由专家支持的QI项目。
作为明尼苏达质量改进计划的一部分,设计并首次大规模试点部署了一个结构化远程教育QI培训项目。为评估该项目的初步影响,采用了基于四个维度的混合方法评估设计:学习者反应、知识、应用意图和初步成果。
在每次预定学习课程结束后,从参与者那里收集对培训质量三个维度的主观评分。实施QI项目前后的调查,以收集参与者的反应、知识、未来应用所学知识的意图以及感知到的成果。收集月度和最终的QI项目报告,以进一步了解项目的成功情况和初步成果。
参与者报告称:(1)对培训课程高度满意;(2)对QI技术相关性的认知增加;(3)对所有特定QI方法和技术的感知知识增加;(4)对在未来项目中应用QI技术的信心增强;(五)在未来QI项目中应用技术的意图增加;(6)对项目的高度感知成功和满意度。最后,初步成果数据显示,八个项目中有六个在质量和/或效率方面有中度到大幅的改善。
QI方法和技术可以通过远程培训和专家指导,利用协作模式在全州范围内的地方公共卫生机构中成功实施。这种独特的培训可以改善核心流程和支持流程,并带来员工的积极反应、知识增加和健康成果改善。该项目可以进一步改进和推广,有望促进经过验证的QI方法在地方公共卫生部门的成功传播。