Suppr超能文献

评估质量改进能力建设的投资:系统评价。

Evaluating investment in quality improvement capacity building: a systematic review.

机构信息

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 20;7(2):e012431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012431.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Leading health systems have invested in substantial quality improvement (QI) capacity building, but little is known about the aggregate effect of these investments at the health system level. We conducted a systematic review to identify key steps and elements that should be considered for system-level evaluations of investment in QI capacity building.

METHODS

We searched for evaluations of QI capacity building and evaluations of QI training programmes. We included the most relevant indexed databases in the field and a strategic search of the grey literature. The latter included direct electronic scanning of 85 relevant government and institutional websites internationally. Data were extracted regarding evaluation design and common assessment themes and components.

RESULTS

48 articles met the inclusion criteria. 46 articles described initiative-level non-economic evaluations of QI capacity building/training, while 2 studies included economic evaluations of QI capacity building/training, also at the initiative level. No system-level QI capacity building/training evaluations were found. We identified 17 evaluation components that fit within 5 overarching dimensions (characteristics of QI training; characteristics of QI activity; individual capacity; organisational capacity and impact) that should be considered in evaluations of QI capacity building. 8 key steps in return-on-investment (ROI) assessments in QI capacity building were identified: (1) planning-stakeholder perspective; (2) planning-temporal perspective; (3) identifying costs; (4) identifying benefits; (5) identifying intangible benefits that will not be included in the ROI estimation; (6) discerning attribution; (7) ROI calculations; (8) sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature on QI capacity building evaluation is limited in the number and scope of studies. Our findings, summarised in a , can be used to start closing this knowledge gap.

摘要

目的

领先的卫生系统已经在大量质量改进(QI)能力建设方面进行了投资,但对于这些投资在卫生系统层面上的总体效果知之甚少。我们进行了一项系统综述,以确定系统层面评估 QI 能力建设投资时应考虑的关键步骤和要素。

方法

我们搜索了 QI 能力建设评估和 QI 培训计划评估。我们纳入了该领域最相关的索引数据库以及战略性地搜索了灰色文献。后者包括在国际范围内直接电子扫描 85 个相关政府和机构网站。提取了有关评估设计和常见评估主题和组成部分的数据。

结果

48 篇文章符合纳入标准。46 篇文章描述了 QI 能力建设/培训的主动层面非经济评估,而 2 项研究包括了 QI 能力建设/培训的经济评估,也是在主动层面上进行的。没有发现系统层面的 QI 能力建设/培训评估。我们确定了 17 个评估组成部分,这些组成部分符合 5 个总体维度(QI 培训的特征;QI 活动的特征;个人能力;组织能力和影响),应在 QI 能力建设评估中考虑。在 QI 能力建设的投资回报率(ROI)评估中确定了 8 个关键步骤:(1)规划——利益相关者视角;(2)规划——时间视角;(3)确定成本;(4)确定收益;(5)确定不会包含在 ROI 估计中的无形收益;(6)辨别归因;(7)ROI 计算;(8)敏感性分析。

结论

QI 能力建设评估的文献在研究数量和范围方面都很有限。我们的发现总结在一个框架中,可以用来开始填补这一知识空白。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f70f/5337696/eec615732f0f/bmjopen2016012431f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验