Suppr超能文献

肝性脑病与驾驶适宜性

Hepatic encephalopathy and fitness to drive.

作者信息

Kircheis Gerald, Knoche Anja, Hilger Norbert, Manhart Frank, Schnitzler Alfons, Schulze Horst, Häussinger Dieter

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2009 Nov;137(5):1706-15.e1-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Aug 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Low-grade hepatic encephalopathy (HE) may impair fitness to drive. Driving deficits have not yet been characterized, and their relation to psychometric test results is unclear.

METHODS

Fifty-one cirrhotic patients and 48 age-matched controls underwent real driving in a multiple sensor and camera-equipped car, laboratory and "in-car" computer psychometry, and driving instructor's assessment.

RESULTS

Ten cirrhotic patients had no hepatic encephalopathy (HE0); 27 and 14 patients suffered from minimal HE (mHE) and overt HE grade I (oHE), respectively. During real driving, mHE and oHE patients showed significantly more violations of in-lane keeping, reduced break use, prolonged reaction times, and diminished stress tolerance compared with control or cirrhotic HE0 patients. In a self-evaluation questionnaire, mHE and oHE, but not the HE0, patients strongly overestimated their driving abilities. According to the driving instructor's assessment, 75%, 48%, and 39% of the patients with HE0, mHE, and oHE, respectively, were fit to drive, compared with 87% in the control group. Driving deficits in oHE patients were largely due to cognitive defects and prolonged reaction times, whereas, in mHE patients, mistakes and attention deficits predominated. Computer psychometric test results worsened with HE severity and age, whereas real driving was age independent. In 25 out of 94 patients, discordant results for driving fitness were obtained (driving instructor's assessment vs computer psychometry); in mHE and oHE patients, the concordance rates were only 62% and 64%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite significant driving deficits, HE patients overestimate their driving abilities. The presence of mHE does not necessarily predict driving unfitness, and computer-based testings cannot reliably predict driving fitness.

摘要

背景与目的

轻度肝性脑病(HE)可能会损害驾驶能力。目前尚未明确驾驶缺陷的特征,且其与心理测量测试结果的关系也不清楚。

方法

51例肝硬化患者和48例年龄匹配的对照组在一辆配备多传感器和摄像头的汽车中进行实际驾驶测试,同时进行实验室和“车内”计算机心理测量以及驾驶教练评估。

结果

10例肝硬化患者无肝性脑病(HE0);27例和14例患者分别患有轻微肝性脑病(mHE)和显性肝性脑病I级(oHE)。在实际驾驶过程中,与对照组或肝硬化HE0患者相比,mHE和oHE患者在保持车道行驶、减少刹车使用、延长反应时间和降低压力耐受性方面存在明显更多的违规行为。在一份自我评价问卷中,mHE和oHE患者(而非HE0患者)严重高估了自己的驾驶能力。根据驾驶教练的评估,HE0、mHE和oHE患者中分别有75%、48%和39%适合驾驶,而对照组为87%。oHE患者的驾驶缺陷主要归因于认知缺陷和反应时间延长,而mHE患者则以失误和注意力缺陷为主。计算机心理测量测试结果随HE严重程度和年龄的增加而恶化,而实际驾驶与年龄无关。在94例患者中的25例中,获得了关于驾驶适宜性的不一致结果(驾驶教练评估与计算机心理测量结果);在mHE和oHE患者中,一致性率分别仅为62%和64%。

结论

尽管存在明显的驾驶缺陷,但肝性脑病患者仍高估自己的驾驶能力。mHE的存在不一定预示着不适合驾驶,基于计算机的测试不能可靠地预测驾驶适宜性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验