• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估电子健康干预措施：持续进行系统评估的必要性。

Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation.

作者信息

Catwell Lorraine, Sheikh Aziz

机构信息

Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126
PMID:19688038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2719100/
Abstract

In the first in a series of three articles on evaluating eHealth, Aziz Sheikh and Lorraine Catwell outline the background to the series and discuss the importance of evaluating the widespread investments in and adoption of information communication technology in health care.

摘要

在关于评估电子健康的三篇系列文章中的第一篇里，阿齐兹·谢赫和洛林·卡特韦尔概述了该系列文章的背景，并讨论了评估医疗保健领域对信息通信技术广泛投资和采用情况的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3139/2719100/7662a380a003/pmed.1000126.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3139/2719100/7662a380a003/pmed.1000126.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3139/2719100/7662a380a003/pmed.1000126.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating eHealth interventions: the need for continuous systemic evaluation.评估电子健康干预措施：持续进行系统评估的必要性。
PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
2
eHealth evaluation and dissemination research.电子健康评估与传播研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.023.
3
Evaluation of ehealth systems and services.电子健康系统与服务评估。
BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1150. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1150.
4
Evaluating eHealth: undertaking robust international cross-cultural eHealth research.评估电子健康：开展有力的国际跨文化电子健康研究。
PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000105. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
5
Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust.评估电子健康：如何使评估更具方法学稳健性。
PLoS Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):e1000186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000186. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
6
Applying the Electronic Health Literacy Lens: Systematic Review of Electronic Health Interventions Targeted at Socially Disadvantaged Groups.运用电子健康素养视角：针对社会弱势群体的电子健康干预措施的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 13;22(8):e18476. doi: 10.2196/18476.
7
Challenges and opportunities of eHealth research.电子健康研究的挑战与机遇。
Am J Prev Med. 2007 May;32(5 Suppl):S75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.01.016.
8
Supporting better care with technology.借助技术支持更优质的护理。
Manag Care Interface. 2002 Oct;15(10):52-4.
9
Web sites related to methods for evaluating Web sites.与网站评估方法相关的网站。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;21(4):83-9. doi: 10.1300/j006v21n04_06.
10
The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics.准实验研究在医学信息学中的应用与解读。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):16-23. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1749. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model.了解数字健康技术在康复中的应用：康复技术实施模型的开发。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 15:2025.07.11.25331266. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.25331266.
2
Using a Robot to Address the Well-Being, Social Isolation, and Loneliness of Care Home Residents via Video Calls: Qualitative Feasibility Study.使用机器人通过视频通话解决养老院居民的幸福感、社会隔离和孤独感：定性可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 May 8;9:e59764. doi: 10.2196/59764.
3
Examining Practices Related to Ethical Aspects in eHealth Evaluation Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Does telehealthcare offer a patient-centred way forward for the community-based management of long-term respiratory disease?远程医疗是否为社区长期呼吸道疾病管理提供了以患者为中心的前进方向？
Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Sep;18(3):125-6. doi: 10.3132/pcrj.2009.00006.
2
Strategic considerations for improving the quality of eHealth research: we need to improve the quality and capacity of academia to undertake informatics research.
Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(3):175-7. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v16i3.690.
3
Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.实施一种商业销售的计算机化医师医嘱录入系统后意外增加的死亡率。
电子健康评估研究中与伦理方面相关的审查实践：一项范围审查的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 5;14:e60849. doi: 10.2196/60849.
4
Implementation and ethical issues of an eHealth-facilitated integrated care model in stem cell transplantation: A qualitative process evaluation study.干细胞移植中电子健康促进综合护理模式的实施与伦理问题：一项定性过程评估研究
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 29;11:20552076251336859. doi: 10.1177/20552076251336859. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Exploring the Potential of a Digital Intervention to Enhance Couple Relationships (the Paired App): Mixed Methods Evaluation.探索数字干预对增进伴侣关系的潜力（配对应用程序）：混合方法评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 14;13:e55433. doi: 10.2196/55433.
6
Development of an evidence-informed implementation strategy for a digital supportive care platform for brain tumour patients, their carers and healthcare professionals.为脑肿瘤患者、其护理人员和医疗保健专业人员开发一个基于证据的数字支持性护理平台实施策略。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 13;11:20552076251316713. doi: 10.1177/20552076251316713. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
The effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation in enhancing lower extremity function in children with spastic cerebral palsy: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激对改善痉挛型脑瘫患儿下肢功能的有效性：系统评价与荟萃分析方案
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 31;14:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103141. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
The CeHRes Roadmap 2.0: Update of a Holistic Framework for Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of eHealth Technologies.CeHRes路线图2.0：电子健康技术开发、实施和评估整体框架的更新
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 13;27:e59601. doi: 10.2196/59601.
9
Integrating patient-centred and tumour-centred cancer care: the EU-MyPath implementation project offers an innovative digital solution with care pathways.整合以患者为中心和以肿瘤为中心的癌症护理：欧盟“我的路径”实施项目提供了一种具有护理路径的创新数字解决方案。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Nov 19;18:26323524241296143. doi: 10.1177/26323524241296143. eCollection 2024.
10
Enhancing the efficacy of healthcare information websites: a case for the development of a best practice framework.提升医疗保健信息网站的效能：最佳实践框架的构建。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 3;14(9):e088789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088789.
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1506-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1287.
4
What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field.什么是电子健康（4）：绘制该领域的范围界定活动。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Mar 31;7(1):e9. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e9.
5
Bad health informatics can kill--is evaluation the answer?
Methods Inf Med. 2005;44(1):1-3.
6
Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck.改善卫生信息系统评估的愿景与策略。基于因斯布鲁克卫生信息系统评估研讨会的思考与经验教训。
Int J Med Inform. 2004 Jun 30;73(6):479-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.04.004.
7
Prescribing safety features of general practice computer systems: evaluation using simulated test cases.全科医疗计算机系统的处方安全特性：使用模拟测试案例进行评估
BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1171-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1171.
8
The great technological divide.巨大的技术鸿沟。
BMJ. 2004 Apr 3;328(7443):788. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7443.788.
9
Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems.用于评估临床信息系统的认知与可用性工程方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.01.003.
10
The promise of e-Health - a Canadian perspective.电子健康的前景——加拿大视角
eHealth Int. 2002 Sep 17;1(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1476-3591-1-4.